What do you think of stay-at-home dads, /pol?

What do you think of stay-at-home dads, /pol?

Jews want to take away the children from both parents, they do that by promoting feminism, which pressures women to follow a career and this ends in having a suicidal birth rate, divorce rates and badly raised children. Also, they want to generate the highest amount of (((taxes))).

If I stay at home I can
>Raise and redpill my children
>Learn more about food and nutrition
>Devote a lot of time for reading and self-improvement
>Have enough time to exercise and do sports

I could make a deal with my girlfriend: I stay at home and in exchange I receive all parental responsibility and alimony in case of divorce.

It's not degenerate by itself but it's a surefire way to get cheated on.

This would be risky for her. In this case I could then file a divorce, receive alimony and raise the children alone. This means I would not need to work, but could keep raising the children. Also, this would give me practically 100% control over the children and I could form them like I want.

Bump

It's kind of stupid since your wife has to take time off work to have the kid anyway. If you want more than one she will have to keep doing this. So even if she was making more than you before having kids she will not be promoted as fast. The best thing to do is work out how many kids you two want. Then pump em out as fast as you can while she doesn't work. Then once they are in school or even a bit before she gets part time, then goes full time later. My parent's had it work out pretty well. My dad used to start work at like 7:30am and pick us up from school at 3:30pm. Mum used to start at 9:30am and finish at 5:30pm. Too bad mum turned out to be a cheating whore

if you do this, your wife will instantly lose any (remaining) respect for you

But she would only need to take time off for a brief amount of time (around the time when she is giving birth) - she could take vacation for that time so it would not interfere with the career.

I would not want to send the children to the school, but to homeschool them - so that the cultural marxists cannot poison them with multuculturalism, homosexuality or diversity.

I would not like to take any part-time job, but devote my entire time to the things mentioned in the first post.

Why? Women are so brainwashed and always think about being opressed because of gender roles. So this would be exactly what they are looking for.

Turn them too far right and they might go left

I can use the time to study how to politically indoctrinate my children, there is surely some literature about it and I can learn from schools which are nothing but indoctrination camps.

This isnt true. Infact it can have the opposite effect. There is the possibility of resentment though, because instead of sitting in the couch on fb all day, you will get fit, play with the kids etc.

so you can be dependent while your woman is the breadwinner in the family and works?

that sounds beta.

>Raise and redpill my children
a real man makes his woman raise his kids the way he wants
>Learn more about food and nutrition
can do while you work too
>Devote a lot of time for reading and self-improvement
that too
>Have enough time to exercise and do sports
and that

How am I dependent? She would be forced to supply me with alimony and give me the children in the case of divorce. Thus, she would much more depend on me, then I on her.

>that sounds beta.
It is, in a perfect world the father would be the breadwinner and the mother would devote all of her time to make the home, assist her husband and raise the children. But maybe I can outjew the Jew by making one sacrifice. I can have control over the children and redpill them.

my wife can make more money than i can without breaking her back and I'm a better cook and a lot more patient with the kids. highschool sweethearts. no whoring around. i still big man alpha dog fart hard. works for us.

Thanks for sharing your experience.

How did you solve the breastfeeding? Best nutrition for babies is fesh milk.

Only acceptable if the wife earns a lot more than the husband, and even then, it's very unlikely she'll stay with the husband for long.

no, you're dependent on alimony by HER, so you're still dependent on her.

And if she is unable to pay alymony anymore at one point. what then? receive social services?

howll you be successful like trump if you receive social services, and ensure the success of your family.

people who do that will never become as powerful and will always be dependent on their spouse or ex.

Putting power of decision making into a womans hands is stupid.

>What do you think of stay-at-home dads, /pol?

>and even then, it's very unlikely she'll stay with the husband for long.
This is why I would negotiate with her to give me complete child responsibility and that she would be forced to pay alimony in case of divorce.

>I would not want to send the children to the school, but to homeschool them - so that the cultural marxists cannot poison them with multuculturalism, homosexuality or diversity.

Don't do this.
It ruined me.
I had literally no friends outside of Steam when I was a young teen because of homeschooling.

I was pretty intelligent and redpilled though.

>Inb4 underage
Steam has been around for 10+ years.

>no, you're dependent on alimony by HER, so you're still dependent on her.
No, I would not be dependent on her, because the alimony would be independent of her will, it would be forced by law. And she would not want her children to suffer in live in poverty anyway.

>And if she is unable to pay alymony anymore at one point. what then? receive social services?
What if I would be the breadwinner and lose my job. It is the same risk.

>Putting power of decision making into a womans hands is stupid.
As I said, part of the deal would be that she gives me the whole responsibility of the children and would be forced to pay alimony in the case of divorce. Thus, I would receive money independent of her will and take threat her to take away the children. I would be more powerful than her.

>Don't do this.
>It ruined me.
>I had literally no friends outside of Steam when I was a young teen because of homeschooling.
Not this retarded argument again. Your parents just did not consider the social aspect of homeschooling. If I let my children meet with other homeschooled children and sign them up to a choir and sports club - they would get plenty of opportunity to socialise.

by dependent on hear i meant dependnent on hear being able to pay alimony?

>What if I would be the breadwinner and lose my job. It is the same risk.
in this case you find a new job, hard to do as a neet.

It's not the same risk because in the case of you losing your job, the way you proceed is in your control.

And you don't have any employable skills in that case.

>As I said, part of the deal would be that she gives me the whole responsibility of the children and would be forced to pay alimony in the case of divorce. Thus, I would receive money independent of her will and take threat her to take away the children. I would be more powerful than her.

As i said no, because regardless of whether she wants to give you money, whether you receive the money is dependent on HER.

And as i also said, a real alpha tells his woman how to raise his child and is dominant to her.

You'll never be an alpha multibillionaire, own multiple companies, if you're a stay at home dad.

The problem is not with dads working, it's the fact, that dads aren't as assertive anymore as they were. so they forgot how to keep their women in check.

Feel free to do it if you think thats a good idea but it's a risky one and you're still not independent because you dont know how to win your own bread, and it would be better if you worked because that way you can be more successful, powerful and own multiple companies-

Having alimony won't give you that much power over.

But at least admit that not all men should be stay at home dads, maybe some so they can indoctrinate the children. But the ones of us who can be successful should strive for success and make their women raise the children the way they want.

Also if you put all of the responsibility of running the country into womens hands then you're gonna have a really fucked up country.

>by dependent on hear i meant dependnent on hear being able to pay alimony?
Why should there be a better chance that I would be able to pay than her?

>You'll never be an alpha multibillionaire, own multiple companies, if you're a stay at home dad.
Well, I do not want to become one, because I don't want to help the shitty (((government))) to raise more taxes. Also, I do not care about becoming a billionaire, I would rather prefer to have more free time, spend more time with my family and do things that help me to grow (philosophy, good books etc.)

>Having alimony won't give you that much power over.
I would have a stable income. Plus a woman would do everything so that her children are not taken away from her. Thus, this is the ultimate power.

>But at least admit that not all men should be stay at home dads, maybe some so they can indoctrinate the children. But the ones of us who can be successful should strive for success and make their women raise the children the way they want.
Men should be the breadwinner and the women should stay at home and raise the children. This is the best solution. But if you cannot have this solution because feminism makes women brainless zombies to follow a career, then this may a way to outjew the Jews.

>Why should there be a better chance that I would be able to pay than her?

Well in my case, most of those i know are kind of stupid, emotional, and not really bound to be successful for long. If you're a smart man, then the risk is better in your control than hers.

And the fact they shouldnt run a country or companies shows that the risk is better in our control.

>Well, I do not want to become one, because I don't want to help the shitty (((government))) to raise more taxes.

I don't like money either, it stinks, and i'd rather enjoy my time than own companies, but nowadays money is a good way to change something. If you don't want to be powerful and run the country, okay.

What if women take over, and change the laws so that men won't get alimony anymore. ever considered what happens then?

>I would have a stable income. Plus a woman would do everything so that her children are not taken away from her. Thus, this is the ultimate power.

but then again, what if the laws get changed?

>Men should be the breadwinner and the women should stay at home and raise the children. This is the best solution. But if you cannot have this solution because feminism makes women brainless zombies to follow a career, then this may a way to outjew the Jews.

But those of us who have the ability to be successful and to make their women stay at home should do that, and some of us still can.

If you want to take care of raising their children, that's okay, to be honest my friend, if this plays out as you think it does, they probably won't be OUR children. unless you decide to become stay at home chad and fuck around.