by dependent on hear i meant dependnent on hear being able to pay alimony?
>What if I would be the breadwinner and lose my job. It is the same risk.
in this case you find a new job, hard to do as a neet.
It's not the same risk because in the case of you losing your job, the way you proceed is in your control.
And you don't have any employable skills in that case.
>As I said, part of the deal would be that she gives me the whole responsibility of the children and would be forced to pay alimony in the case of divorce. Thus, I would receive money independent of her will and take threat her to take away the children. I would be more powerful than her.
As i said no, because regardless of whether she wants to give you money, whether you receive the money is dependent on HER.
And as i also said, a real alpha tells his woman how to raise his child and is dominant to her.
You'll never be an alpha multibillionaire, own multiple companies, if you're a stay at home dad.
The problem is not with dads working, it's the fact, that dads aren't as assertive anymore as they were. so they forgot how to keep their women in check.
Feel free to do it if you think thats a good idea but it's a risky one and you're still not independent because you dont know how to win your own bread, and it would be better if you worked because that way you can be more successful, powerful and own multiple companies-
Having alimony won't give you that much power over.
But at least admit that not all men should be stay at home dads, maybe some so they can indoctrinate the children. But the ones of us who can be successful should strive for success and make their women raise the children the way they want.
Also if you put all of the responsibility of running the country into womens hands then you're gonna have a really fucked up country.