Why are small nukes not used against ISIS?

They would scare the living daylight out of them, so that they would give up pretty quickly. No more war.

Why the hell are nukes not used in Syria?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/ZFGpqxmRx_M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The first and second protocols of the Geneva Conventions

at the time of the paris theatre massacre, i seriously thought Raqqa would receive a tactical nuke the next day. i even gave it 50/50 odds.

now i realize the french are unbelievably and hopelessly pussified cucks.

>The first and second protocols of the Geneva Conventions
Who cares about the Geneva Conventions?

neither US nor Russia wants nukes to become more like a conventional weapon

Obama also wants minimum civilian casualties (because the TV images would hurt his popularity with his left wing support base) which means only attacking bases outside of cities/towns

>at the time of the paris theatre massacre, i seriously thought Raqqa would receive a tactical nuke the next day.

After 9/11, I thought America would glass the Afghan mountains. But only a few days later I realized how big of a cuck America is.

Pretty much this.

Also you act like they don't want the conflict in Syria and the destabilized state of the Middle East to continue forever; or at least until their end goal is reached.

>neither US nor Russia wants nukes to become more like a conventional weapon
Why? If it ends a bloody war, then nukes should be fine.

why are most germans on Sup Forums so uninformed and effeminate?

Because theres a difference between a bloody war and having radiation zones fucking everywhere because everyone decided nukes weren't all that bad after all.

Because muh feelings. Southwest Asia should have been glassed long ago in my opinion.

Also, they would do it to us in a heartbeat if they could.

for the same reason big nukes are never used, i.e they do not exist.

>and having radiation zones
Why are people having these absurd notions of nukes that somehow a whole country gets uninhabitable because of some nuke. You can use a tactical nuke and nothing much happens with regard to radioactivity. For Christ's sake, Nagasaki and Hiroshima were both inhabited after the nukes and it was alright.

You thing Leftards bitch about dead syrian kids now?

Radiation sickness makes you look like a corpse that can still beg and plead for the cameras

Not to mention pic related

>Nagasaki and Hiroshima

incendiary bombs

the depleted uranium is a big problem, youtube related

youtu.be/ZFGpqxmRx_M

if anyone launches nuclear weapons others will launch theirs in retaliation

its just not worth it

>if anyone launches nuclear weapons others will launch theirs in retaliation
How many nukes does ISIS have?

You're missing the point. If the US used nukes, do you think Russia and China would sit idly by?

>implying the sandniggers care about the Geneva Convention

>he thinks people care about the Geneva Conventions

yes

its not like islamic terrorists arent a problem for them too.

just phone up putin and ching chong and be all like, "yo, were going to nuke the shit out of the middle east, that ok with you?"

You could fill 4 of these with incendiaries and get the same death count

>If the US used nukes, do you think Russia and China would sit idly by?
The more countries use nukes to stop wars, the better, don't you think?

Every nation involved in the Geneva Conventions for one

We don't want another country making fucking tentacle hentai