>It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities
The amount of explosives needed to be planted to bring down these 2 towers would undoubtedly be a large enough amount that setting, tying in etc etc would be noticed by employees. Prove me wrong. I'm a certified blaster.
Jackson Morales
Jew detected
Logan Nelson
You know Jew did it
Jace Walker
Do Indians not have bump power? WTF I can't see my post in the front. This is RAYCISSS you faggots
Jack Powell
They were micronuked, the blasts were forced straight up and that's how most of the material was seemingly vaporized. Just look at OPs pic, that is not a collapse, that is pretty much a mushroom cloud. Building 7 was a demolition regardless of the details on how they planted the charges but not difficult considering it was a spook house and the spooks gained most from 9-11 installing their spook state. The false flag just gets some extra scrutiny being in the internets age otherwise people would just eat the big lie like they always have.
Caleb Lewis
Yeah many people had lung disease due to asbestos, we don't know how many died of cancer. And if that cancer had anything to do with Nuclear Radiation
Jacob Scott
You can't bump your own post faggot
Nathaniel Myers
SHART
Joseph Gutierrez
poo in loo nothing u can do pajeet
Zachary Peterson
when are they going to build a copy of the world trade centers and test this on mythbusters?
Elijah Scott
Wipe your ass Pajeet
Gabriel Adams
...
Lucas Clark
>not taking into account that a fucking plane hit the building at 300 mph 9/11 conspiracy shits are the worst
Christian Parker
Read PDF Jew shill
Joshua Brown
When the show gets un canceled
Nathaniel Lee
You can't fucking tell me that two planes wouldn't tear through this shit like butter.
I'm sorry, it was 19 Radical Islamic Terrorists helped by the Saudi's(With a possibility of Mossad/CIA)
Bush and Bill both covered it up. Obama wants the Saudi's to get away with it.
Colton Fisher
>2 planes caused 3 buildings to collapse and caused several cars to spontaneously combust
wew lad
Brayden Ward
>It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11
How many of these structure fires were also accompanied by high-speed airliner impacts?
At the moment I'm engaged in setting up an experiment which will prove, once and for all, that the temperatures achieved from burning jet fuel can and does weaken steel support beams sufficiently that it makes them incapable of supporting the loads they were designed to carry.
>This will be a scale model experiment, carefully set up to duplicate the actual conditions as closely as possible.
>Once completed I will be posting the results on Youtube.
JET FUEL MAXIMUM BURNING TEMPATURE TOPS OUT AT 1500 DEGREES F
STEEL MELTS AT 2750 DEGREES F
Official narrative is that it weakened the frame causing the collapses
>SUPRISE THE STEEL MELTED >THERMITE BURNS OVER 4000 DEGREES
ALSO HOW DID WTC 7 FALL?
HOW DID BBC REPORT THE EVENT 26 MINUTES BEFORE IT HAPPENED
Gavin Johnson
Doesn't prove anything though, maybe the initial collapse? but how was the structure beneath so weakened it provided very little resistance and failed all the way to the ground.
There's no way the small portion above the impact zone can crush the rest of the building into the ground. not physically possible by gravity alone.
Jeremiah Barnes
I cut beams for a living and I can tell that was done by a torch.
Hunter Williams
...
Aiden Kelly
The only real support in the building were around the elevators and the staircases. Each floor was just a giant concrete slab. This isn't the Empire State Building. All they had to do was take out the center at a low enough level and the entire building would pancake down on itself.
It tore through those center supports like fucking butter, I'm sorry mate.
Ethan James
Anybody?
Jaxson Green
Maybe you can start by doing a You Tube search, which already has a video showing jet fuel weakening steel beams
www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2TMVDYpp2Q
Asher Powell
yup
glad to see we have other informed people here
Gavin Cooper
I shit post for a living and I can tell that was done by a leaf.
Brody Lee
How many burning giant pools of Jet fuel were in the buildings?
NIST says most burned off in the impact.
Jeremiah Cook
Fuck off shill
Evan Brooks
All they can say is "weakened steel" and "falling debris"
Watch as I get no (You)s because they can't argue with LAWS OF PHYSICS
Liam Hall
Where the syrup? no waffles either? PANCAKES!?
Even the experts that spout off the official government conspiracy theory don't support pancakes you faggot shill.
Brayden Bell
If you think you can see/hear bombs going off in every floor it's actually one concrete slab slapping down on another one, forcing an entire acre of air out the sides in 1 second. That creates a massive clapping sound and plooms of dust that look like explosives.
Blake Ramirez
>heat travels downwards >heat intensifies with distance from impact
Do you even physics, bro?
Isaac Gonzalez
I already got to work responding to this post before you even replied.
see
Owen Parker
Think Napalm.
Jeremiah Morales
FFS I'll say it again The melting point of aluminium is lower than that of carbon steel When 200 tons of aluminium shreds itself at 200 mph,then is mixed with 50 tons of aviation fuel AND then the entire water tank is emptied onto it, the result is explosive enough to bring down the twenty floors above it and causing the concertina effect we saw that day.
>Prove the EXPLOSIONS were a result from the building falling apart and not the building falling apart because of EXPLOSIONS.
Proves explosions from a fucking plane filled with Jetfuel is weaker then an unknown amount of some kind of explosion or w/e you are implying.
Kevin Peterson
also water would have boiled off at the temperature the jetfuel was burning at
even it the metal was molten aluminium, it would have been slowed down everytime it hit a floor meaning that the building would have collapsed floor by floor instead of at a constant speed
Juan Wright
>They were micronuked,
>what is critical mass? you cant just build smaller and smaller nukes. in order for the fission to take place you need a minimum amount of uranium. the smallest nuke possible would still have the power of several dozen tons of tnt. nukes would have completely obliterated the towers not just make them collapse.
lrn2physics
Xavier Adams
The towers turned to dust and blow off into the wind with the use of tech the normies don't even know about, that's why most people just brush it off, it's something they don't even know exists or would/could have seen before.
Evan Gutierrez
Nothing above the impact of the fucking plane requires extra damage you stuipid fuck. It wouldn't compromise it's structural integrity.
You are so fucking dense and stuipid. Remember that.
Eli Johnson
You have failed to take some very critical information into account.
There wasn't just jet fuel burning.
>There were also a vast amount of hydrocarbon plastics burning in that building, too. In fact, almost all of the furniture and appointments were plastic.
>large amounts of burning plastic generates temperatures of 3000 degrees!
>Another missed but crucial item: the steel beams used to support the floors of the building WERE NOT SOLID STEEL BEAMS but were composit, constructed TRUSSES.
Pic related:
It shows the galvanized steel TRUSS supports used to hold up the floors of both WTC towers.
Initially, these were subjected to the very dynamic energy of the initial explosion of jet fuel when the plane hit but, later, they were subjected to the much longer lasting and much HOTTER temperatures of the abundant and various plastic items burning in the structure as a result of the jet fuel ignition.
>As I'd previously said, large amounts of plastics can burn at temperatures of 3000 degrees!
I've done an exhaustive search for such videos and I've found that there simply aren't any unbiased, scientifically based videos on that particular subject.
Angel Jones
What if the 747 caused enough structural damage to collapse the towers?
Charles Hill
Probably pooled Jetfuel. Maybe some other shit. I've seen bricks and concrete melt so desu anything is possible in that clusterfuck.
I already referenced Napalm ITT btw.
Carson Richardson
What needs to be talked about along with the jet fuel beam meme is that there was a POOL OF MOLTEN METAL at the base of the towers for WEEKS. Jet fuel can't make lava.
Gavin Diaz
what are you replaying to. it was an inside job.
William James
>Pic related.
Evan Hall
If WTC actually happened why are their so many videos of planes hitting it. Like im gonna believe some fag is out in an area where you can see the alleged WTC and is just fucking filming it for an art project.
The entire event is faked, there were no towers. The "aftermath" was just an exposed landfill.
Nobody every actually saw it happen
Andrew Barnes
OH WOW THAT'S COOL WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THIS INFORMATION? OH, SHITPOST INTO A HUGBOX/ECHOCHAMBER NO BETTER THAN REDDIT? OK THEN.
Gavin Williams
I already said ITT that Bush and Bill covered up the fact that the Saudi's did it.
Who are YOU replying to, Shill?
Matthew Kelly
Israel did 911.
Logan Miller
Every fucking time I see this I cannot convince myself that 2 planes hitting two other buildings caused this collapse.
WC7 is why I will never fully swear off the conspiracy that it was planned
Landon Peterson
...
Jaxson Carter
Are you telling me a shitty "gotcha" experiment isn't unbiased enough for you?
Cameron Williams
You can only bump your own thread once every 10 min
Joseph Ward
see
Jackson Murphy
9/11 conspiracy theorists are probably the stupidest people ever.
Jason Clark
Jet fuel cant melt steel memes
Lincoln Hughes
SHART
Easton Brooks
Vans full of explosives driven by Israelis were pulled over by police the day of the attack.
Blake Ramirez
leafs are probably the stupidest people ever
Hudson Stewart
They could have caused the tops to collapse as they did but they would not have crushed the remaining structure to the ground at a high rate of speed like it did. Worst case scenario without explosives there would be a half a tower and 3/4 of a tower still standing
Carson Lopez
Designated Shitting Streets. >convert to Christianity to stop it
Xavier Barnes
I know they just believe the government conspiracy theory that 19 cave men shitted on the most powerful nation in the world with ease. fucking idiots.
