Why do STEMfags get triggered so hard by humanities, specially philosophy?

Why do STEMfags get triggered so hard by humanities, specially philosophy?

Other urls found in this thread:

theamericanmirror.com/hillary-donor-let-know-penance-owe/#more-18243
investmentwatchblog.com/george-soros-and-the-rothchilds-banking-elite-connections-exposed/
sarawakreport.org/2016/08/90-federal-police-officers-raided-edmond-de-rothschild-bank-how-aabar-scandal-could-dward-1mdb/
youtube.com/watch?v=claY2UU9-5c
youtube.com/watch?v=tshLc6jYm2Q
haaretz.com/israel-news/family-values-1.323094'
pastebin.com/d3HssQbE
theatlantic.com/notes/2015/09/philosophy-majors-out-earn-other-humanities/403555/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Unabled to think outisde the box.

Degree in literature here. It's the other way around.

We look down on them. If you have a noteworthy intelligence you can't get "triggered".

I love philosophy. Especially classical philosophy.

Modern art IS a bunch of useless faggotry, however.

we don't get triggered, but we think that is kinda stupid the way humanitiesfags try to dodge objective scientific debate based on crude data using lame relativism.

They've been trained to think that just memorizing formulas is intelligence.

I can't blame them since the fields that are supposed to be more intuitive such as humanities and philosophy have fallen to the same fate. In reality, both are noble branches of academia, but STEM happens to get you a better job.

It's quite sad to think of how far higher education has fallen.

this desu. STEM kids usually enjoy humanities as well

>Scientists are generally people who like quantatative explanations
>Various phenomena can't be quantified

>If you have a noteworthy intelligence you can't get "triggered".

Oh snap

Because people with STEM education provide the world with things that have actual value.

>none of my science classes diss on humanities
>take an ethnics studies course (thanks UC)
>"And I know science majors aren't used to thinking about what's being taught but try to question things"
>Jump back to linear Algebra
>"And if this proof doesn't make sense or you don't believe it feel free to challenge it"

Bio is maybe the only science where you memorize random facts, but at least the labs make up for that.

Anyone who hates other majors just has an inferiority complex. The only people you should hate are the stereotypes: Douchebag engineer, fedora stem, snowflake humanities, "I can deconstruct an argument so I'm never wrong" social science majors.

I never met a faggot business major since they tended to hate themselves.

>Douchebag engineer
Starting my engineering course in a couple of weeks. How do I avoid being that guy?

the humanities are great and all for a hobby but a man should do something with his life with quantifiable benefits to soceity.

Enjoy your world without art, music, literature, philosophy, architecture, and basically everything that makes human life worth living.

the weak should fear the strong

This is a valid question bros. How to avoid bean this.

Because they are faggots, feminists and entitled niggers.

I think all majors are important. People who look down on other majors are assholes.

The only majors deserving of hate are
>communications
>gender studies
>"pan african/chicano/asian american/nativeamerian" studies

Everything else is fair game tbqh familia

The stereotype of an engineer isnt douchbag, its cargo shorts and superhero shirt wearing permavirgin. Just work out and read some literature occasionally

It's not that I'm triggered by the subject matter, it's that I think people willing to spend 100k+ on humanities courses are retarded.

Because Humanities and L.A. tend to be very difficult subjects to ace in, but they provide absolutely no skills to the student, except a good memory.

An engineering student gets triggered because they study a lot to get average grades and infinite skills, then they get told that all degrees are equal in market value because 'muh old books'.

Humanities studies are topics that should be done as amusing pasttimes. And like masturbation it should be done on your own time and in private.

INCLUDE US.

Hitlary's e-mail to ROTHSCHILD : ‘Let me know what penance I owe you’
> theamericanmirror.com/hillary-donor-let-know-penance-owe/#more-18243

Soros just a puppet and cover for ROTHSCHILD
> investmentwatchblog.com/george-soros-and-the-rothchilds-banking-elite-connections-exposed/

“possibly the largest money laundering operations ever uncovered" - released recently
> sarawakreport.org/2016/08/90-federal-police-officers-raided-edmond-de-rothschild-bank-how-aabar-scandal-could-dward-1mdb/
90 Federal Police Officers Raided Edmond de ROTHSCHILD Bank!

Jean-Claude Van Damme calls out Rothschild and Rockefeller connection on live TV
> youtube.com/watch?v=claY2UU9-5c ...

Rothschilds Own Hillary Clinton: Isn't That Nice? - by ex-Huffington Post journalist
> youtube.com/watch?v=tshLc6jYm2Q

RICHEST ROTHCHILD:
'I do not believe in God' ,
'I think women today are better suited for business than men,’
> haaretz.com/israel-news/family-values-1.323094'

MORE: pastebin.com/d3HssQbE

SPAM THIS WHEREEVER U CAN.
HELP US.
HELP US SAVE HUMANITY!!!

All majors are necessary, but not in the numbers we have them. 95% of english majors are not passionate about reading and writing and will never write anything of note, they just chose it because they had to go to college and it seemed "chill". I have English major friends who literally dont read in their spare time.

An unpassionate STEM major, on the other hand, will still do something beneficial for society and be able to support himself and his family.

Because they're the most blue-pilled believing that high paying jobs are the measure of a man's worth.

In other words, they're good goys and don't understand why anyone would choose not to be a good goy.

I don't. I like reading philosophy, literature, and humanities stuff.
I just wouldn't waste my time in college studying it, unless I wanted to work in academia or some shit, which I don't. Hence why I chose mech e.

>They've been trained to think that just memorizing formulas is intelligence.

>Humanities brainlets actually think this is what STEM is

cause it's useless, I hate most of mathematics for the same reason

I'm a stem fag and I think this is fucking retarded. Plato, Dostoevksy, Mozart, Chesterton, Shakespeare, and so on, have no value?

Stem simply provides the shell of civilization, the humanities give it meaning. They are both fundamental building blocks of civilization.

The only humanities course I've taken is a symbolic logic course in philosophy. It was hilarious watching you guys get wrecked by your own subject.

Daily reminder that Philosophy is literally the foundation of all knowledge and therefore all other subjects are derived from and therefore an inferior sub group of Philosophy.

Thus we Philosophy students are meta-academics, laying the groundwork for the self-absorbed humanities, arts and stem students whilst looking down on them.

It's because humanities students have just been trained to think that memorising philosophies and arguments is intelligence

i look down on them unless they are mature students, i love philosophy, but only an idiot would study it at 18, that's why I'm doing mech eng

I am a mathfag, but I do not care about humanities.

> memorizing formula


The delicious smell of the butthurt.

There's a reason computers can memorise and apply complex mathematics in nanoseconds, but none is capable of memorising and applying a complex philosophical argument to something.

As someone who works in the STEM fields:
AHAHAHAHAHA
You're fucking joking, right?
No, seriously. This has to be a fucking joke.
Every time we get a new crop of interns, the first challenge is socialize you useless retards to not sperg out over everything. Every fucking company, every fucking time.

Hydrogeo master race here, used to read Bertrand Russell and take history classes as electives for fun in undergrad as an escape from all that math. Been catching up on my literature as well - just started rereading The Brothers Karamazov. My friends and acquaintances that studied a humanity in school may not be the most scientifically literate but they show an interest in geoscience and a deference to those more knowledgeable than themselves in the discipline (I am not a master in physical anthropology or classical history either despite my interest in them). Maybe you just need to interact with more well balanced individuals who dont let their crippling insecurities ruin everything.

>t. Someone who knows nothing about computer technology

STEMfag answer

STEM=qualitative, notSTEM=quantitative

[i]
The primary aim of a Qualitative Research is to provide a complete, detailed description of the research topic. It is usually more exploratory in nature.

Quantitative Research on the other hand focuses more in counting and classifying features and constructing statistical models and figures to explain what is observed.
[/i]

It's sort ying-yang thing, masculine and feminine, they don't really hate each other, but can't understand the other position either.

A lot of conflicts (eg gender relations or racism vs race realism) can be traced back to this fundamental principle.

>cargo shorts
I wear jeans

>superhero t shirt
I wear t shirts but nothing to do with superheroes

>permavirgin
Yes

Am I a stereotype?

>t. Someone who knows nothing about constructing a rational argument

>memorizing formulas
>this is what humanitiesfags think STEM is

Great argument my man, you really made me think

I don't think you fit the description of "noteworthy intelligence"

We don't, that's why we mock them.

I think what you meant to ask is why do humanities majors get so triggered when we laugh at them

I find both of them incredible and scary.

My girlfriend's dad works with engineers and this is what he told me when I was going in to work at the company.

>"They act like a bunch of know it alls. They don't listen when you offer advice and they don't ask for help when they have a question. We have some that look at the cubicles and ask where there's is on the first day. Just because you have an engineering degree doesn't mean you start at the top."

So if you're just a normal kind person who has an interest in engineering don't worry about it.

You should probably get better interns then, most genuinely intelligent STEM majors are practically normies, in my experience outside of maths the autists are useless

Do you seriously have people introduce themselves to each other?! What the fuck? Those STEM-faggots sure are fucked up.

>implying a bucket of paint and a canvas has the same value as a masterpiece

Just don't be an elitist fag. I know a guy who thinks that engineers are literally gods and non-engineers are unworthy to be alive. He even hates other people who study different branches of engineering than his.

Mathematics is full of normies. The autists mostly study different fields in physics. I suppose it's because majority of masters in maths end up teaching.

Philosophy majors simply contribute nothing to society, Stem people don't hate you, you're simply irrelevant with no objective value to society.

We just like to laugh about how you pride yourselves on rational thought yet go $100k in debt to graduate and astoundingly lack the foresight to pick a field of study that will feed you.

Is there even another red-pilled humanities subject outside of philosophy?

B-but hitler was a humanities-san.

There's still politics, senpai. I simply can't imagine that thing as pure STEM (direct democracy maybe?). At least, it's been never really tried before.

I agree, my point is I think maths (and perhaps physics, but it's arguable) is the only field where being noticeably autismo is acceptable in the workplace. It's not even acceptable in CS anymore due to massive oversaturation.

Just don't tell anyone what you do if you aren't prompted to. Don't use your degree or your title as a means of qualifying what you have to say or argue, use facts because you're not a retarded liberal arts cuck.

You'll have no problems if you know how to act like humans. Don't be assholes or condescending bricks. Everyone else knows something that you don't, so there's no reason to be smug about something you know and they don't. Some know lots about physics and maths, whereas some know what it's like to major in gender studies.

For me it comes down to universality. The humanities create things that stimulate chemicals in human brains. This is nice and all for keeping us happy and fulfilled, but STEM is about uncovering the objective nature of the universe. If we met an alien species, we would care about and understand each others physics and computer science, we woulndt give a shit about each other's Shakespeare and Mozart.

Which is funny, because humanitiesfags main argument is that they are in touch with truths and we are mere builders of gadgets, when it's basically the opposite, they are paid minstrels.

This so much. All kinds of math and science guy have their favorite show, game, book etc. Some of them can be snobby about they're line of work, but it's far more often that you will see art/english teachers chimp out because there's 'no creativity' in stem.

Architecture actually requires STEM

Also art, literature, philosophy, etc are pretty (((cultural marxism))) today, for the most part.

Especially those unemployed fuckers who just say that they are artists because special snowflake syndrom

value is subjective

philosophy is the only valuable humanities desu

>He doesn't know how to use the word objective

Sounds like you need a philosophy degree.

Also get an economics degree while you're at it, you don't understand what value means either.

Even as measured by own simplistic value system, philosophy degrees win.

It never ceases to amaze me how materialistic and utterly philistine stem graduates are.

theatlantic.com/notes/2015/09/philosophy-majors-out-earn-other-humanities/403555/

replace turkic with baltic

>muh cultural marxism

>Don't be assholes or condescending bricks.

It's called meritocracy - in technology. Respect is earned on largely skill basis. You can be the biggest jerk, but as long you can show your technical skill for it, sure, why not?

Just because non-STEM normies can't into it.. well, that's their problem.

I don't get triggered by humanities.

I get triggered by (((humanities))).

Deconstructing literally everything ad infinitum is not valuable

You can think it is, but it's not, sorry

We wouldn't even be having this conversation if not for engineers

I am a chemist.
I read philosophy (mostly recent french, like deleuze, foucautl, badiou).
Have you ever met someone studying philosophy reading chem books?
I don't think so...

In fact, I always saw people from humanities complaining about "STEMfags", when people from stem field... then just don't care about humanities.

If you weren't such a useless, incompetent, sub-intellectual retard you wouldn't be forcing us to sperg out in the first place

Something dangerously close to autism.

>theatlantic.com/notes/2015/09/philosophy-majors-out-earn-other-humanities/403555/

Philosophy majjors have higher IQs on average than other humanites, no shit they out earn them.

This is ridiculous. Art and music have plenty of value just like math and science have value too. Why do we have to divide the two areas so much.

el argentiniANO

>He thinks success is based on technical skill

I think you'll find the overwhelming majority of the people at the top are there as a result of exceptional inter-personal skills.

Thread

Because we know we'll be paying for your welfare.

>oversaturation

Just corporate pseudo-professionalism. Sure that floor IT monkeys are subject to office politics. But the more specialized in IT you are, and can't be really replaced by a normie trained monkey, the more autismo you can get away with.

God bless.

They're autism and not as intelligent as they like to think they are.

The sole exception is of course people who are involved in pure mathematics, those are on the highest level similar to theologians.

>bothering to study economics
>not just teaching yourself

There is zero (0) use for an economics degree if you don't want to be an economist. Even management degrees are more useful.

nature and sex is better than any of those pathetic things

Because humanities aren't objective

...

Because the " muh pure maths " is a meme.

I do some financial maths and i assure you, there are lots of research in this field.

For other people, do you know the Lamberton or El Karoui degree ?

That's not cultural Marxism.

>implying

Never said anything about success (in objective sense of the word). For a STEMlord, success and money barely register as measure of merit.

As I said, the merit is restricted to STEM, not finance or social relations. We try to filter out these, in fact.

And yes, a lot of STEMlords are objectively losers because of this.

I'm a STEM fag and after getting a minor in philosophy I have a lot of respect for people who make careers out of philosophy. Shit is brutal to make a career out of.

Christ, this is such an autistic way of looking at the world. I was going to write a post about the respect I have for STEM fields and the people who excel in them, but your reductive gibberish changed my mind.

hmmm

Funny how I know several investment bankers who took economics.

>Being so autistic you think everything is vocational and see no value in intellectual pursuit for reasons other than making a living

Autism

They have no understanding of nuance

because it's dominated by a bunch of fags and feminists, and they all have more fun and get laid 10x more than us

Every philosopher is just a pseudo intellectual loser who contributed nothing to their civilization

Mathematics is a mental contruct. Like every other field, it is wholly subjective

As someone with degrees in both I can tell you they are not.

STEMfags think artsfags are useless fucking hippies that spend all day thinking about useless bullshit and will soon need welfare after they finally graduate in their 7th year.

Artsfags think STEMfags are unfeeling autists that deserve to be laughed at whilst they slave themselves to death in a very ackward fashion without even really knowing why.

In many ways they're both right.

lol, sauce?

dunno philosophy well and im not stem but i'm very, very perceptive and i think it has something to do with philosophy becoming it's on simulacrum black hole of meaningless meta-questionique without any practical applications, even when it comes to trying to discover truth, also the jews obviously

...