>character development
Character development
>good photography
>callbacks
>Lovecraftian
>filler
>style over substance
>plot device
Drives me nuts when people complain about "lack of character development" in a film that has absolutely no focus on character development nor intends to.
>ambiguous end
Race mixing feminist protagonist
>mythos
>cinematography
>directorial debut
>a glib facsimile
>""characters""
This. The reaction Dunkirk got here is a prime example. Does every war movie have to have plucky spirited characters with backstories? No, because war is impersonal and hellish
>cinematic universe
Things such as visuals are purely a bonus to the character development.
>Villeneuvian
t. plot driven surface-level filthy casual
We need to talk, Bugs.
>"it had a good plot"
Film as a medium is essentially visual. ''Character development'' is something you expect in a novel or a play. It's sometimes nice to have in a movie but it's not a necessity.
>rising action
>dénouement
>world-building
>just turn your brain off
>stage play
you guys get more tired and played out by the day
t. plotfag
>tour de force
>"I couldn't identify with any of the characters"
these people have to go
>Kafkaesque
>story arc
>prequels
>character does really stupid things just to advance the plot
>nonlinear
It's important depending on the story the film was trying to tell but when some uses it as part of a Cinematic Checklist to criticize a movie it's a safe bet to ignore what they have to say
Its like when someone complains about Plot holes all the time
>Mise-en-scène
>climax
every time
>foreign
>Shakespearean
>movie
>image
>sound
>motion
this holy fucking christ
i hate reddit
>at this point your just typing random words
>orthogonal transitional arrangement
>your
>the cgi was good
>the main chick was hawt
>character remains same from birth till death
favorite youtuber
...
>poop
haha