Character development

>character development

>good photography

>callbacks

>Lovecraftian

>filler

>style over substance

>plot device

Drives me nuts when people complain about "lack of character development" in a film that has absolutely no focus on character development nor intends to.

>ambiguous end

Race mixing feminist protagonist

>mythos

>cinematography

>directorial debut

>a glib facsimile

>""characters""

This. The reaction Dunkirk got here is a prime example. Does every war movie have to have plucky spirited characters with backstories? No, because war is impersonal and hellish

>cinematic universe

Things such as visuals are purely a bonus to the character development.

>Villeneuvian

t. plot driven surface-level filthy casual

We need to talk, Bugs.

>"it had a good plot"

Film as a medium is essentially visual. ''Character development'' is something you expect in a novel or a play. It's sometimes nice to have in a movie but it's not a necessity.

>rising action

>dénouement

>world-building

>just turn your brain off

>stage play

you guys get more tired and played out by the day

t. plotfag

>tour de force

>"I couldn't identify with any of the characters"

these people have to go

>Kafkaesque

>story arc

>prequels

>character does really stupid things just to advance the plot

>nonlinear

It's important depending on the story the film was trying to tell but when some uses it as part of a Cinematic Checklist to criticize a movie it's a safe bet to ignore what they have to say
Its like when someone complains about Plot holes all the time

>Mise-en-scène

>climax

every time

>foreign

>Shakespearean

>movie

>image
>sound

>motion

this holy fucking christ
i hate reddit

>at this point your just typing random words

>orthogonal transitional arrangement

>your

>the cgi was good
>the main chick was hawt

>character remains same from birth till death

favorite youtuber

...

>poop
haha