DAH!

DAH!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CFEHxJqPrC0
m.youtube.com/watch?v=KmdBHOUCDnM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Which Marylin Manson video was this again?

IT'S YOU WHO'S OUT, VOLDY, OUT OF YOUR MIND!

That sequence always felt really odd to me. I liked the scene with Harry trying to push Voldemort out of him, but the random shots of Voldemort whizzing about with some clouds in the background was just weird

>I liked the scene with Harry trying to push Voldemort out of him

I always found it ironic that when you try to push it out it goes in easier

Brokeback Phoenix makes good use of the shots of Harry face down on the ground struggling against Voldy
youtube.com/watch?v=CFEHxJqPrC0

In the Half Blood Prince, during the scene where Harry attempts to get dumbledore water in the cave, directly after the first zombie grabs Harry there are about 9 cuts all back to back to back of just Daniel radicliffe's face being in shock. It's the strangest thing I've ever seen in any film.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=KmdBHOUCDnM

2:07 to 2:11

He didn't finish his sentence, he meant to say that he was stuck in "Deh!" dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

oh I am laffin

They're children's books.

Its like the director couldn't decide which one he liked the best and decided to just use them all for half a second

Awful. dumbledore is such a bad actor. He looks like hes mentally retarded, like Downs tier.

pretty bad children's books desu

Nice catch, that is really weird.
The whole sequence annoyed me to be honest because they made the Inferi all look exactly the same like they were a species. But actually they were reanimated corpses of humans/wizards. Using that would've been much more terrifying. Like that scene in LotR where Frodo falls face-down into the swamp and all those dead people come alive and grab at him. It was really tense in the HBP book, but the movie turned them into random creatures who all looked the same while they should've been hundreds of different looking pale dead corpses trying to drag Harry down with them. They just looked like Grindylows in the end.

OFFICIAL CANON PAIRS FUCK THE BOOKS AND THE MOVIES

Harry X Luna
Hermione X Malfoy
Ron X Ginny
Dean X Seamus
Neville

>Ron X Ginny

Not that big a deal since Molly and Arthur married as well.

If we're disregarding source material be it books of films, I'll have a go.
>Harry and Luna, living happily in her country home together
>Hermione and Krum, just because it's nice to see a total chad go for the nerdy girl
>Ron and all his brothers, in a very Freudian way of asserting their dominance
>Neville and Mrs Sprout, because we all know he wasn't THAT good at Herbology
>Snape and Slughorn living out their fantasies with Polyjuice, Snape fucking Lily-Slughorn because "always", Slughorn fucking Lily-Snape because Lily was his favourite female student
>Draco alone in a Vanishing Cabinet wanking
>Dumbledore in the other Vanishing Cabinet wanking, occasionally their fluids teleport to the other cabinet
>Ginny and literally anything with a penis, and the Giant Squid
>Mr Weasley jacking it into the exhaust pipe of his Ford Anglia

>Snape and Slughorn living out their fantasies with Polyjuice, Snape fucking Lily-Slughorn because "always", Slughorn fucking Lily-Snape because Lily was his favourite female student
>Mr Weasley jacking it into the exhaust pipe of his Ford Anglia
Fan fiction waiting to happen, actually it probably already exists. We're all aware of the womping willow tentacle raping the flying car right?

They weren't related by blood though, maybe distantly but all pureblood families did that. You make it sound like they were siblings

>Both pureblood in a very small gene pool.
>Both gingers.
>Both the only gingers of their age in the entire series.

Arthur being a sisterfucker is implied far more than Dumbledore being gay.

You actually made me do some research and while Arthur was a Weasley and Molly was a Prewit, they both stem from the Black family (like the majority of purebloods). That's only because Molly's mother was a Black who married a Prewit, and Arthur's mother was a Black who married a Weasley. So fuck me, they are related. Nothing that would be considered incest though.

Really? I always liked the newer dumbledore, I found he captured a nice space between wise much knowing mentor and all powerful arrogant douche. The pouty face you're talking about does make me lmao quite a bit though
something about the whole scene at the cave seems rushed to me, like that's where they cut a lot of the time to allow the dumbledore death scene to be as important as it was

The cave scene was rather short though I admit I jumped at the part where Harry's leg got grabbed by an Inferious. It has some nice moments, but it felt rushed and they didn't do the book justice. Like I said, they should've been dead corpses, not identical Golllum-like creatures. And they cut out that fantastic line (though it was in the extended version) where Dumbledore weakly says "I am not worried...I am with you."
I'll admit that seeing Dumbledore suffer while Harry is forced to make him drink the potion that reminds him of his worst memories was very strong though. Seeing Dumbledore in such a weakened state after being established as the most amazing wizard of all time was really sad and powerful.

>562x368
apply yourself

jesus christ that scene is almost in grayscale

Are all Purebloods related really? Is it all just arranged incest to keep the magic going?