Why NatSoc isn't racist but

Could you red pill me on why the 3rd Reich wasn't racist?

I'm aware there was more than 150,000 Jewish soldiers in the German Army but that's all. I also know about the Havarra Agreement.

I'm tactfully intoducing friends about Jewish global dominance, about the general castration of their people and why. Now I'm at another hurdle, explaining why NatSoc's are not racially intolerant but intend to protect the white race from Jewish clutches.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc
encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages/S/O/SovietpartisansinUkraine1941hD75.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_(1st_Galician)#The_soldiers
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_(1st_Galician)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

ib other races in nazi uniforms

honestly it bothers me that Hitler wasn't out to make a completely white planet

Selfless bump

Impossible retard. Eventually whites will catch a killer tan genetic near the equator line. Still, he tried for Europe and that's enough.

Racism: 'The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.'

The Nazi government wasn't racist by the definition. They were however, supporters and promoters of their own race and completely unrelated in terms of racism their own culture.

They were racist

Watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc

...

Gr8 thanks user. Now some fact sheets and hard statistics of the 3rd Reich's tolerance, I know theres more than what I know so far.

What were some more blue-ish pilled quotes from the man himself? What was his true plans if he conquered other countries with other races in them?

NatSoc = Germany for Germans; Europe for Indo-Europeans (i.e. Aryans)

That's all. The rest is Anglo propaganda.

They weren't racist, at worst you could describe them as Germanic chauvinists and exceptionalists.

Perfect, keep them coming. I'm going to join a NatSoc group and perhaps become a leader/speaker in its main message but some are a deterrent in Bongland as they never vocalise pragmatic tolerance it's just hate filled spewing and no thought out agenda just 'Kill them, their inferior, violate their human rights'. I'd like to change the rhetoric to 'We won't harm them, we will accept them as humans, we just want an equilibrium set in stone that all races should follow. No race mixing unless it's a superior man impregnating an inferior woman. Also deport or abort' etc.

That's the only way I think Nationalism can be modernised and grind globalism to a thinking stop.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


are you real

>total war with russians
>literally enslaved ukrainians, belorussians for factory labor
>treat west europe with modicum of respect

Now, I cannot deny that these people were helping create the incipient thousand year reich (though I've only seen pictures, here), but they absolutely were considered "untermensch" under Hitler's ideology.

Is this why it fell? Because they assumed Anglos were too far lost? Or they didn't negotiate and cooperate with us?

>literally enslaved ukrainians, belorussians for factory labor
>Ukrainians
What? 40,000 Ukrainians volunteered for the SS Galicia legion. They all knew a National Socialist Europe was preferable to a Communist one.

Expel/exterminate native populations for lebensraum. Too many ukrainians in ukraine for nazi or soviet taste evidently

...

But didn't they go to war with Russian's over resources and land?

And they imprisoned then during the war, I'm sure after they would have lifted them from incarceration and gave them land and work to provide to the higher councils of Germany?

Surely there was a plan after that right? If they didn't enslave then Ukrainians etc. would have emigrated to Britain and fought them

encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages/S/O/SovietpartisansinUkraine1941hD75.htm

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army

>posting propaganda
I'll check your fact, but more enlisted for any other side. Ukraine in '42-3 was a clusterfuck of loyalties.

jidf btfo

>Doesn't know what happen in the Eastern Front
Sounds about right coming from a Nazi Apologist

Thanks. Also what are you two discussing, if Ukraine was more loyal to SS or?

Also watching American History X as we post. Comfy af

Nothing propaganda about it, after Holodomor the National Socialists were viewed as liberators.

cant find the quote but >>all races have untermensch. he attributed this to communists mainly and its evident today; there are cucks in all races

...60%

Now quit your flimsy one upmanship and provide facts before that 60% turns to a 40.

>inb4 muh wiki
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_(1st_Galician)#The_soldiers

Fucking christ my burgerbro, please cite your "volunteer" shit. Ukrainians would have, as they do now, much rather had a nationalist government of their own over EITHER the nazis or the soviets. They were not "allies" of the authoritarian German Wehrmacht. They were treated as badly under either regime.

For the First week before the So called Honorable Nazis turn their guns on the civilians populace. Don't you know anything what happen

Absolutely, but that was only immediately after until the realities of German National Socialist rule really sank in.

Holodomor was a horrific tragedy, no doubt about it. However, I challenge you to tell me why the nazis would have treated them any better during a post-war nazi europe. Or even dispute the murder of vast numbers of villagers and regular Ukrainians as the anti-partisan purges took place in 42-43.

You don't hand guns, tanks, and supplies to forced conscripts who would, without loyalty, just defect. Likewise the Ukrainians entered later in the war and continued to fight after Stalingrad.
>inb4 wiki
You're aware of their bias and want me to ignore it, but I won't. You have to dig to find pieces of the truth, use your instincts.

From wiki as well


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Waffen_Grenadier_Division_of_the_SS_(1st_Galician)

Of course in the article's opening there is the obligatory "Hitler hated slavs" but it goes on to describe a fully volunteer unit.

>Created on 1943
Your opinion is discarded

Germans made twopolitical concessions: It was stipulated that the division shall not be used to fight Western Allies, and would be used exclusively to "fight Bolsheviks". The other concession was in that its oath of allegiance to Hitler was conditional[11]on the fight against Bolshevism and in the fact that Christian (mostlyUkrainian Greek Catholic ChurchandUkrainian Orthodox) chaplains were integrated into the units and allowed to function (in the Waffen-SS, only the Bosnian division andSturmbrigade Wallonienhad a clerical presence). The latter condition was instituted at the insistence of the division's organizers in order to minimize the risk of Nazi demoralization amongst the soldiers.[12][pageneeded]Indeed, Nazi indoctrination was absent within the division.[13]

The creation of foreign SS units had been carried out previously in the name of fighting against communism; with French, Dutch,Latvian,Estonian,Croatian, andBelarusianunits, among others, had been created.[14]The creation of a Ukrainian SS division was perceived by many in Ukraine as a step towards the attainment of Ukrainian independence and attracted many volunteers.

I didn't post an opinion.

What's it like being 15 these days?

I'm 22 and understand fully the irreparable consequences of race mixing and it's effect of slowing down mankind's progression and of of a peaceful homogeneous society.

What's it like sucking abduls cock faggot?

>I'm 22 and understand fully the irreparable consequences of race mixing and it's effect of slowing down mankind's progression and of of a peaceful homogeneous society.
We had a chance but that cuck sperg Hitler ruined it for all of us
>What's it like sucking abduls cock faggot?
I assumed it taste like National Socialism

>NatSoc isn't racist
>All blacks and Mexicans need to leave despite being citizens

I'm not sure I understand OP. There is nothing wrong with racism.

This is all true. However, this doesn't dispute more Ukrainians and Russians living in Nazi occupied Ukraine rebelling against the new order than for. I'll search some more for my own sources on this, as it's coming from memory for the most part, but the anti-Nazi guerilla partisans were a big factor both before and after Stalingrad. In fact, the invasion of German troops was a signal of instability, at least for the nationalist Ukrainian partisans, and so these people who were being suppressed by the Soviets and disillusioned by German Nazi authoritarianism of the same caliber took a chance and ended up paying dearly for it.

Good discussion, user, and thank you.

bracket the sign! wow wow look at him

There isn't but it's just the word discrimination that's been coupled with the definition more recently.

It's their main way of shutting you down by labelling you as a white supremist.
Those Neo-Nazi fucks are trash and give NatSoc a bad name.