>>88364590

> waaaaaah why isn't it all flowers and sunshine, why doesn't everyone work for free, what do you mean there's war in space

He doesn't "love" it though. You understand that there's a whole spectrum of feelings between love and hate right?

Rodenberry was a retarded jew, everyone will always hate ppl who aren't exactly like them, I don't give a fuck how far in the future you set it, I'll still hate niggers.

Don't bother, the eben memers watches every video just to pretend to not understand such things. That or they're advertiser.

Except he LITERALLY said "I loved it", you moron.

Fake argument bump

Kino review.

>It's Mike likes a Bad Robot Production's flick

fly passing by @ 2:31

mike's hand goes behind the STD logo @ 4:33

this happens more than a few times actually

also this shouldn't have been a re:view episode lmao what were they thinking

Does it really matter?

>So Rich what did you think about Star Trek Discovery
>I hated it, it wasn't Star Trek
>Really? Because I loved it
>Well I didn't HATE it...

This meme needs to die. All it does is out you faggots as friendless losers that have never had a civil discussion with someone in real life.

t. fucktard who didn't watch the video

Well I don't HATE this meme...

It's funny how easily they influence Sup Forums. Now lots of people here will defend DSC. Good.

Well they came up with the new series themselves, I guess in an attempt to correct the habit of meddling with HiTB's main focus which revolves around new-coming things.

And then they just intentionally screw up the divison line for no reason.

I never once got the impression Mike loved it. How do you autists arrive at the conclusions you make?

So?

I got the impression he liked little moments that reminded him of the older shows and that he is going to give the rest of STD a chance

>doesn't remember that there was a whole episode about an albino Klingon in DS9
Casualfags.

>Now lots of people here will defend DSC
yes but they'll call it STD now

>good acting all around

the moment I closed the video

still, not as good as jurassic world

Just out of curiosity, if I decided to take a shit on your forehead, how would you respond?

depends on what you look like from down there

>made the spiritual and economic disaster known as Space Cop
>yet has the audacity to shit on Star Trek

"No!"

Oh, ok then. I thought you had poor responsive skills. My bad, carry on.

YOU need to die for responding to the meme, faggot. Nobody was going to reply to him

So did Michael switch from stun to kill on purpose or not, has anyone gone back and checked?

>You and me, Raptor. Dance off!
>*Run-DMC starts playing*

>Mike liked TFA
>Mike likes STD
Mike isn't as nearly as cynical as he pretends to be.
In fact, he seem to be very easy to please.

what kinda fucking name is michael for a lady anyway

what's next a man named shirley maclaine

That's right Jay.

Jessi is a unisex name.

Jackson is also unisex.

Name assignments change over time.

e.g. names like Ashley and Meredith used to be names for boys.

Yes. She picks up the phaser and it's got a blue light. Then the Klingon kills the captain, and it cuts to her and it switches to red light and she raises it and fires.

People generally use "i" to make names feminine. Bobbi, Jessi, Jessie, can't think of any else. There are few women named Jesse or Bobby.

Jackson is a surname, like Cassidy.

They want comfy Star Trek back. I agree.

Mike was way more positive on it than I was expecting. Rich got cucked into agreeing with him.

wtf I love std now!

>Mike loves Discovery.

That's not at all the impression I got from that video.

Mike is such a pleb holy shit. he probably has the worst taste of the entire group.

>>Mike loves Discovery.
>>Rich doesn't, but is excited about the upcoming episodes.
they are paid hollywood whores

lucas was a hollywood exile, that's why they were free to dump on him

Mike was spot on about how this would've been better if it had been set after the TNG era shows. Set it far enough ahead and you can have the Klingons having been isolationists for a couple hundred years.

He literally wants his Sci-Fi foibles pandered to on the most basic level, I have no idea how he can't see how stupid it is.

>bored fat dudes have opinions: the show
what do you idiots get out of this

sup jay

kek

surprised no one has done the "Beta Reviewer vs Chad Critic" for Jay vs Mike

> They can't make new TNG-like Trek because it's [Current Year]!
> What about the Orville?
> Cut to bad RT critic scores after claiming RT was being manipulated in prior video

Go fuck yourself Mike.

RRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

this

Jesus Christ, someone tell those faggots to use backlight when they have a black background like that. The fuck is this shit, you're talking about movies and you can't even do this one simple thing.

>space cop anywhere above 1
that's a high score for an unwatchable piece of shit...

They use backlighting for pretty much every video they've done aside from this one. Find something better to complain about.

>loves jurassic world
>loves marvel capeshit
>love disney star wars
>hates escape from ny
>hates blade runner
>hates the orville but loves star trek discovery


when are these faggots going to admit that audiences like THEMSELVES and hollywood's attempt to pander to them, is what is wrong with modern movies?

Star Trek was never all flowers and sunshine. However, it was, overall, a positive message of hope. The series was able to create conflicts and interesting problems and stories without resorting to "here are the bad guys now have a big fight and kill each other a bunches" all the time. They'd also spare the villains, not because they could use the villain as some kind of bargaining chip, but because it was the right thing to do. I'm still not sure how this series will turn out, we're only two episodes in (and we're still not in the main ship and haven't met all the cast), but as far as the pilot goes, it's just disappointing and depressing as a Star Trek show.

Hey RLM, I know you're lurking here,

Suggestion: do porn reviews

It's hilarious, people love nuStar Wars in comparison to the prequals simply because they've been told that this is the kind of Star Wars they wanted, and if you look back at these nigger's TFA review, they fell for it.

the video was weird

Mike should hate STD and not love it

No, they don't. Their lighting is always the standard sitcom type, but in this latest video with that black background they fucked up.

Mike is the one with the worse taste in the whole crew, so him liking this is still in character

he is just more hyperbolic when he dislikes something, but he likes all kind of garbage all the time

S C H L O C K

There's literally a hair light in the image you just used.

see I liked that Star Trek was meant to be about moving beyond petty conflicts, but eventually that started constraining the story

Next Gen and DS9 only got good when they moved past that shit

This desu. They were obviously bought by Disney earlier. Maybe same this time too. But desu, STD was bad, but not that bad.

so was Vivian

t. unironically named Vivian

Which is from above.

back to t_d with you wannabe nazi failure

It's still considered a backlight, dumbass.

It's not.

Fucking go to bed, Mike.

he's actually a bit of a pleb. So is Rich, but he never pretends to be into movies

it's Jay that actually knows shit about movies

std is everything he claimed he hated about the tng movies being nothing more than dumb action movies, plus it's as dark and dreary as dc capeshit which they all hate, but for some reason he loves it.

A light that comes from the back is not a backlight? You're really stretching just to be able to pointlessly complain.

the same happened with Star Wars Episode 7

they all loved it for what it was

but in truth it's a piece of shit movie worse than the prequels combined

There's a big difference.

STD is brand new characters being dumb and actiony, which is acceptable.

The TNG movies were old and established characters forced to break with their previous characterizations in order to become dumb and actiony, which is not acceptable.

It doesn't come from the back, you idiot.
What the fuck is this shit? Am I being trolled?

yep. mike hated the prequels, but that's low hanging fruit. beyond that, he's never shown exceptional taste. quite the opposite in fact.

You're not being trolled but you clearly are a moron.

Except Mike also says that JJTrek burned itself out after 3 movies and yet he thinks it's going to work in a TV series?

>but in truth it's a piece of shit movie worse than the prequels combined

Found the contrarian pleb

Why do you faggots always get so butthurt when these guys don't validate your opinion?

isn't that the point of a discussion board?

In this case because they claim to be fans of classic Trek, have disliked the JJTrek movies and yet somehow find a new series based on JJTrek acceptable. It literally makes no sense.

Didn't they say that Beyond was the best one? The problem isn't the movies themselves burning out, it's just one of them (Into Darkness) being burned out. If that hadn't existed then the JJ franchise would be fine.

but the movies were just good guys against bad guys, they shoot each other until bad guy is dead, that's not the structure of the new series at all even if it's still action shit

How is your post relevant in any way?

STD is brand new characters being dumb and actiony, which is acceptable.

JJTrek is old and established characters forced to break with their previous characterizations in order to become dumb and actiony, which is not acceptable.

There's a big difference.

They should have just did a "Mike and Rich talk about Star Trek" video. Re:view should be for stuff that didn't come out just this month

plus, that knock against the orville using rotten tomatoes was irritating, since fans like because it's attempting to be more like trek than discovery is.

>There's a big difference.
no there's no difference for 95% of the public which are just new people, not fans of the original series, and he was talking about the formula getting boring for normies not for trekkies, which should still apply to the series

They basically said if it wasn't labeled star trek they wouldn't have cared.

I thought we're talking about why Mike is willing to like STD.

The general public might not see the big difference, but Mike does.

casual reminder that mike also initially loved force awakens

I think Mike is too much of a Star Trek fanboy to shit on STD right away.

It's like capeshit.

They hate the overall trend of capeshit, but they like individual entries within that trend.

They hate the overall Abramsification of the Star Trek franchise, but they like individual entries within that trend.

and jurassic world

mike never seemed to care about that kind of fidelity to the original work as long as the changes function

they're fine with 2 of the jjtrek movies, even though they're dumb action movies using pre-established characters. the major issue isn't whether characters are being utilized consistently, even though that's a valid problem they had with the movies. the major overriding problem is that they aren't optimistic moral and philosophical tales like trek is supposed to be.

The albino wasn't a Klingon. Go crawl back to the general kid.