What say you, Sup Forums?
What say you, Sup Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
Fuck off with your propaganda Correct The Record
>number of tax returns not released
>number of emails deleted
>number of times putting national security at risk
>number of times met with kkk leaders
>facts
>propaganda
you sounds like a nigger
wtf I'm with her now
Number of donations received from murderous regimes in exchange for friendly treatment by the US government
>Facts
>FACTS
Fuck off shill
Times Shillary obstructed Justive: 33,000
Times she went to jail for the minimum 5 year sentence PER ACCOUNT of OOJ: 0
Defend that criminal whore and her half-wit lackey running mate all you want
You'll just be one more noose on the day of the rope.
>can be guilty of crime you aren't convicted of
It's like you aren't aware that the USA has a constitution.
sources?
>open investigations
>open
Libtard check it. OurGlorious future leader defeats Hillary and Obama and saves the Constitution. Let's make America great again with Donald Trump. youtu.be
I say it really caused me to ponder
>can be guilty of crime you aren't convicted of
Yes. Frankly the opposite implication is either extremely naive or patently absurd.
>Number of paedophiles they got off then laughed about in a recording
Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land, in the USA. It is the cornerstone of our justice system. You cannot be guilty of a crime you are not convicted of, in the USA.
It's the law of the land in Denmark, too, by the way.
>Hand over these emails
>>Destroys subpoenaed emails
That's very explicitly OOJ
Next you're gonna tell me a murder never happened if Hillary doesn't go to jail for that, eh Shill?
Incorrect. Obstruction of justice is a crime. You are not guilty of crimes that you are not convicted of.
Your concept of Jurisprudence is as retarded as your political candidate.
We have all the proof in the world she did it.
That makes her guilty.
That's how Innocent until PROVEN guilty works.
We proved it.
It's not "Innocent until sent to Jail by a Judge in a Court of Law"
You aren't guilty in the eyes of the law, no. Doesn't mean you're not guilty. If you did it, you're guilty regardless of whether or not you're convicted.
wtf, I hate Trump now!
well what what anyone get out of fining politicians for 'racial discrimination'? There's an entire industry of accusing businesses of that and it needs to stop.
Incorrect. You prove someone guilty in a courtroom--not on internet message boards.
> Number of countries they would use military action against, or want to obliterate
She is guilty, the DoJ just decided not to prosecute because "they didn't find intent"
No dipshit
You prove it with Facts.
I realize you seem not to understand the concept of Facts.
But to the rest of us they are the cornerstone of reality.
Courts don't mean shit.
For instance, the US Supreme Court once ruled that the Tomato was a Vegetable.
It, factually, is not.
But to your warped sense of the world, Tomatoes are now vegetables, because a judge said so.
Some CTR is probably super proud about making this meme.
However
You are slime. I can easily bury you in the woods after flaying you, no one will ever know except for the animals that listened to you scream for hours.
I'll never be guilty of a crime, amazing this world that I live in. I'm with her.
Tax Returns - Not a requirement, and literally no one cares. Yes, it's not illegal to release returns while under audit, but if doing so would mean every tax lawyer in the country went sifting through them to look for even the tiniest error, you would probably wait too.
Emails released - Trumps emails are not public record, unlike Hillary's who shouldn't have ever needed to be released because she never should have had them in her possession in the first place.
Retweeted supremacists - At least he wasn't best friends with one, unlike someone else.
Foundation Donors - Who cares, his foundation actually donates the money it gets
Fined by IRS - Citation needed
Violated immigration laws - Citation needed
Bankrupsies - Number of successful businesses, Trump: 100s, Clinton: 0
Open investigations - Clinton has had at least 3-5 open investigations just within the last year. The TrumpU case was DOA, nothing will come of it. The whole thing was a glorified seminar.
Fined for racial discrimination - Citation needed, there are plenty of examples where he has been ahead of most others in racial inclusion.
Try harder next time.
># of emails released
>50,000+
nice one
...
its not even bait, theese are facts not funny
now this is good bait, see