Justice League Art Book Spoilers

Should I post Scans?

Other urls found in this thread:

screenrant.com/justice-league-art-book-cover/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

yes. its probably the only shred of Snyder approved material left from the film.

K

Sure, why not

I'm not going to watch this movie until a year after it comes out and I'm bored one night and decide to torrent it.

So post em.

>batman's crotch is bigger than his head

what a visonary filmmaker zack snyder is

>when you realize OP only has the cover and was just baiting people

genuine question
what happens if this movie flops? not financially obviously but in quality? the whole DCU would wither

WB had a bunch of box office winners this years so it wouldn't even matter

>flops in quality
I think this is almost a certainty from what has been said in Snyder/Terrio's and Whedon's differences in script and filming
I was really looking forward to this movie until WB so openly stated theyre changing its direction

But that's happened every movie and WB marketing has spent years attempting to realign public opinion of each shitshow.

>Should I post scans guise XD
>artbook release is Dec 15
Bravo OP
screenrant.com/justice-league-art-book-cover/
>Unfortunately for fans who are hoping to analyze these sketches, concept art and behind-the-scenes shots and try to piece the story together, the book will only be released on 15 December, a month after the movie hits cinemas. In any case, this would still most likely be a fun book that DC fans might want to purchase and add to their collection.

>i was looking forward to a zack snyder movie

lol no you weren't

>reddit spacing
>forcing opinions
please be quiet.

These kind of movies always flop in quality, no capeshit has been good since the days of Nolan. If you meant (((Rotten))) Tomatoes, then nothing happens, they go on as usual. Reminder that DC has a higher grossing per movie than Marvel and Wonder Woman made more than Civil War and Iron Man 3 in the US. They'll be fine

wait, the reddit spacing maymay was forced by marketers?

hilarious

Notice how there have been zero announcments other than the names of the supposed future movie slate? Because they are waiting for JL to make or break the DCEU. If it flops, consider it dead.

that's an odd claim to make as every entry into the DCEU has been horrible but WB keeps plugging along with it's legion of indians trying to realign public opinion of each abysmal shitshow to put asses in seats for the next, only to start the cycle all over again.

>it's legion of indians
But DC is the white american franchise

>t. shitskin

I get that you like it because you think white people like it, though.

So OP's a lying faggot and this thread just turned into brandwar faggotry, good job.

This. sage this shitshow lads

too much negativity towards DC, huh

It's negativity towards shitposting in general, but you can warp it to suit your agenda if you want to, kiddo

>(((Bernstein)))

>23 posts
>11 IPs
How much does Disney pay Hiro to allow this?

yep

yo wonder womyn sucks ass just saw it

>no capeshit has been good since the days of Nolan
Nolan's Batman is worst Batman, Batman and Robin is more Batman than Nolan's Batman.

Believe in based Zaddy

What does that have anything to do with what I said? Fuck off.

>claim next movie being bad will end the DCEU
>all four have been bad, DCEU keeps going

>DUDE WATS DAT HAV 2 DO WIT WUT I SAYS??

Hopefully they realise that they made more money just by leaving the directors be. Every film after BvS so far has had an obscene amount of corporate meddling

the reason BvS made any money was the embargo, the simultaneous international holiday weekend release, and cutting it down to 2.5 hours.

also all the ad placement.

please do

So what's the deal with superheros teaming up? I mean what kind of benefit do you have to bring Batman along when facing an intergalactic threat?

>no meddling in bvs

... oh so it was snyder's vision to stop the movie for a few minutes so wonder woman could watch a bunch of trailers for the next movies? I mean I know his boipucci literally gushes whenever someone offers him some adplacement, but goddamn man.

Your cynicism would be excusable if there was an intellect to accompany it. If the only reason for that scene that occurred to you was setup for future films, you really are too stupid for words, in almost the literal sense of the phrase.

took that long to thesaurus all them words huh

If you think that required a thesaurus, my condolences on the profound dearth of verbiage you laughably reference as a mental lexicon.

mah thinks was you wanted ta sound like the smarts so yas went threws and tried to sees if any of dem werds could be made gooder.

Methinks thou dost protest too much, brainlet.

Care to discuss my initial point? No? I thought not.

ya notice ahm talkin liek a retard? dats shakeyspear's kinda meaninless in dis here contex

alser, yer startin dot were jes ye adhom'in all ova yerself

Yeah, as devoid of meaning as your deflections, at least on a superficial level. A more in-depth analysis lays bare the unvoiced fear that your evasions reveal, fear that you're being outclassed on almost every conceivable level.

In other words, you're too chickenshit to engage in real discussion, just as you're too narcissistic to entertain any possibility of truth, the truth being that you're an intellectual coward who protects his fragile ego behind a facade of unwarranted superiority and "worldly" cynicism.

yo nig, you ain't done no anals yet. Yo just adhomin all over your shit.

Yeah, because I'm waiting for you to actually present anything worth countering. I did - that you're too stupid to infer anything but sequel setups. You've yet to offer anything that supports that assertion.

Your initial attempt at a counter was simply reiterating what your opponent already said, and then ad homing all over yourself and declaring your superiority.

ya know, if you want to real talk it.

just post it faggot

My initial post was , where I call you out for cynicism devoid of actual thought, the oldest and most obvious veneer of the intellectually bankrupt.

you'll notice your only backing of your assertion was a reiterating previously stated information as if it was new information.

I was giving you an opportunity to shoot down any other interpretations that you've doubtless already encountered. You haven't which tells me you've never even given any of them the benefit of the doubt, because you live in a fantasy where you're the star, where your shining, enlightened, unearned, poorly considered, cynical interpretation is the only valid one.

So you're just going to keep adhoming all over yourself rather than risk criticism of your interpretations.

It wasn't even mine to begin with, but I considered it and came to agree with it and what it implies:

Lex is deeply wired into government surveillance. He was setting himself up to be the public face of the metahuman population, the "upstanding citizens," at least. He's part of, if not the actual *heart* of the A.R.G.U.S. project, most likely because he promised the government faction that General Swanwick vaguely references a means of putting Superman and the metas on a leash, even if it's one they'd have been unaware of.

Advanced Research Group Uniting Superhumans. Sounds nice and comic-booky. It wouldn't surprise me if it was coined by Lex himself, the giant with a hundred eyes.

pre-baked counter: making lex a huge mastermind behind oceans of conspiracies to discredit superman and make him irrelevant doesn't paint lex as brilliant, it paints him as pretty stupid. As considering his epicurial motivation, his point is self evident. Then if he's an idiot, all the people dancing to his tune are bigger idiots.

Mangling Epicurus was a smokescreen, and also a great way to tell the man with super-hearing that Lex doesn't think of him as all-knowing, a trait of godhood that Lex reserves for himself.

In order to try to say a character is pretending to be stupid, you have to show him as intelligent at any point.

>"Knowledge is power, and I am- Wait, no, what was I saying?"

Only that you're the most powerful man alive, Lex.

>changing lines so they'll fit your headcanon

this should've indicated to you that you've gone off the deep end.

>hacks the Batcave
>eliminates all witnesses, co-conspirators, and truth-seekers in a way that can be laid off on a lunatic with a grudge against Superman
>surveilling literally everyone
>wanted to create an alien menace. Created an alien menace.
>wanted Superman "dead." Superman status: currently "dead."
>does it all by relying on nothing but human nature

If Lex hadn't misjudged Finch, Bruce, and Superman, underestimated their integrity, he would have gotten away with literally everything.

OK, you complete the sentence then. Be sure to do it in a way that leads into what Lex says about knowledge without power, too.

>if the plot convenient stupidity hadn't abated for a moment, lex would've gotten away with everything

... Like I said, lex being behind literally the entire movie doesn't make him look smart, it makes everyone else look really, really, really stupid.

proud to empower this great city?

>they're dumb because they don't know what I know

Being incapable distinguishing between knowledge a character possesses versus knowledge you as an audience member possesses is an indication of autism. I provide that information without further comment, nor further reply.

If that was what he meant to say, then why did he stop?

>world's greatest detective
>lois lane with the metahuman power of script knowledge
>superman

>none of these characters notice how odd everything is and how lexcorp has it's fingers everywhere

Because he was characterized as an odd stuttering spastic who inherited his fortune and never worked a day in his life that people only placate because they like money from the first moment he was introduced?

if you're going to try to force the pretend-retard thing, you kinda need some sort of evidence.

So sort of like us, Google, and a certain Not So Allegorical government agency?

Oh, the pretend-retard thing validates your Sup Forums sensibilities.

Your adherence makes sense now.

Not for the whole movie he wasn't, only after the AI and the Kryptonian database cooked his brain a little.

>lex scenes were non-linear

oh look, another headcanonism with no backing

Yeah, you're right. He just happened to be wearing the same clothes and carrying the same briefcase by sheer coincidence.

I see getting mindblown also bleaches clothing.

Will keep that in mind and not wear dark colors to my next mindblowing.

This actually one of my criticisms of the film. If it had been up to me, I'd have had those scenes interspersed through the movie instead of back-to-back like they were. It's one of the reasons I'd like to see the full four-hour version. I think it was edited to consolidate for time and still preserve narrative flow and didn't work quite as well as it could have.

I see contrasting background and lighting are beyond you. Watch the scenes if you're that ass-blasted. It's the same outfit, down to what he's carrying.

the marvelpajeets have realized that they are simply too brainlet to have an intellectual debate with us DChads so they resort to such nonsense and shit up the board in the process.

At this point I'm saying that even if it was intended to characterize a billionaire as only having one copy of an outfit or bad laundry service or an autistic billionaire not wearing the same clothes a lot was fucked up severely by snyder-color.

And now I'm saying even if it was intentional and not just headcanon, there are so many other automatic interpretations for samey clothing that it just doesn't register unless you're mining the movie for minor details to overblow to validate a pre-set belief the movie wasn't terrible.

i gave up having a serious discussion with these poos. its been more than a year since the film was released and endless discussions and threads have already been created. they simply refuse to understand

I see you've entered the 'replying to yourself' phase.

Can you really only stand to push your headcanon for less than an hour?

we're different posters though

nah, its kinda obvious you're posting from two phones.

It's not just the clothes, dumbass. It's the case and what's in it. It's the focus of multiple shots. He showed up with it on his first day, Zod's prints already in it. Now go for the gold in the mental gymnastics competition and tell me that a guy like Lex didn't make straight for the heart of the ship on his first day, then just so happened to be wearing an identical outfit on the day that he finally did.

>lex would only take the only way to access and interact with the kryptonian ship to the kryptonian ship only once

... negro they just created an entirely new medal class of mental gymnastics, just for you.

And there's three of us.

Way to cherrypick, faggot. It was a compound sentence for a reason, regardless of whether your ADD ass can read it all in one go or not.

Christ, you're such a fucking idiot.

back to adhoming all over yourself, huh.

Even if this headcanon of your was intended, the core of the issue here is due to the basic narrative failures of every aspect of the movie, literally every scene had much-more-likely go-to interpretations than anything that supports your headcanon. Even if the movie had good ideas and they were on display, they were handled so poorly that it just comes off as a total clusterfuck where literally the entirety of the first two hours means absolutely nothing because the titular conflict is forced by kidnapping mommy, then solved by calling mommy by her first name (and batman not knowing who clark's human parents were until that moment), then a contrived reason for a CGI-monster fight is created and everything before that is forgotten, again.

Yeah, because the set-up was the point. Under no circumstances was Clark ever going to confront Bruce on his own. The best he'd ever do is continue showing up to take his toys apart. Lex knew that. Apparently that's too much for you to grasp, though.

... I think you're conflating like with grasp.

The plot was extremely forced. The hope in a vs scenerio is always that they came up with a compelling reason for the conflict. Not an intensely shaky one that is shaky by design so the next move can be full bro-down.

Is this faggot going to deliver or what?

Artbook isn't out yet, he just posted the preview cover art.

> the hope in a versus scenario

Oh, you mean like The Dark Knight Returns, where Clark was forced into confronting Bruce by the government, then proceeds to rationalize the conflict to assuage his own guilty conscience?

Are you presenting that as another example of bad writing? Cause it was pretty bad there too. It was as close to good as it could be, but because both needed to survive it was undermined.

I'm citing is a comparable to what we're given in BvS. The only difference is who's doing the rationalizing.

>"Bruce, where's my mom??" staring ashton kutcher
>ideological schism

>even comparable

At this point, even though I really can't tell if you're baiting or stupid, I'll just say, if you're baiting, you've been baiting so long that you really are just stupid.

>this pleb criticizing Frank Miller now

Yeah, I think we're done. Miller didn't need either character to survive for any reason at all. Either or both could have died, as it wasn't in-continuity or canonical. The reason that neither did was for the simple reason that Miller was writing a story about two heroes finding their way again after both having lost it to varying degrees.

I guess we are done, as now you're acting as if frank miller had total creative control and not just a rough outline of what could and couldn't happen as set by DC comics.

...

>posts jews

What porn movie is this?

cant resist that chad cock