The late night hosts are finally making sense

the late night hosts are finally making sense

lmao dude it's my 2nd amendment right to own a 60 round magazine semi automatic rifle so I can shoot squirrels and deer n shiet

I think that if everyone would have gun there no one would die!

who gives a shit what these pompous overpaid hacks think? Kimmel is literally calling for gun control while having armed guards protect him every day. Hypocritical fucks.

Yes, it is.

...

No, its so some president with too much control wont get away with total control.

This. Take guns away and wait till someone famous gets shot even after gun control. See what they think then.

>le smug, self-assured comedy man lectures from his soap box

maybe he wouldn't need armed guards if america wasn't so full of retards with guns :)

What a disgusting, exploitative and racist headline.

yeah dude my ar 15 will shoot down tomahawk missiles and ray gun shells and super secret area 51 weapons that we haven't heard of yet lmao

Yeah take a look at what happened in Venezuela recently, gun control worked GREAT

Teerorists in europe dont hold cdls but drive class a trucks. So licensing doesn't work. In order to prevent gun violence you would have to actively confiscate every gun.

These marxists are trying to start a civil war to restructure american government.

Why would the government lay waste to their own infrastructure?

...

Try to ban guns in america and you will have a civil war. That's why it doesn't happen.

I LOVES MUH GUN!!! GUNNNNNSSSS YASSS ITS MY RIGHT TO HAVE ONE HAHA COME AND TRY AND TAKE IT ;) HAHA GET IT CAUSE I'LL FUCKIN MURDER YOU IF ANYONE TAKES MUHHHHH GUNNNNS!!!

Guns don't kill people, gunshot wounds kill people.

This is you.

>shaun king

Why are there no late shows featuring a conservative host?

I love this.

Dictator is surrounded by armed guards giving a speech gloating about his new America. A group of patriots show up with AR 15s and fire until they get him.

Daily Show Host is from south africa. where they have more gun control, less gun ownership, but 17 gun homicides per 100,000 people. While the USA has 3 per 100,000.

It really turns the old cogs.

>muh guns
Good goyim.

prohibitions on things dont work in this country. bans on alcohol, pornography, drugs and weapons are all doomed for failure. no amount of laws would prevent some nut with no criminal background from doing what he did in las vegas

hey reddit

The 2nd Amendment existed first for true purpose and now out of principle. It’s essentially the right to defend yourself against a tyrannical government which the founding fathers were clearly in support. Now we would more than likely lose a rebellion against our government/military but the principle remains. When you have a first world country of 350 million people, if you really want something illegal you can get it pretty easily if you aren’t a total retard. Banning guns will be as effective as banning drugs and I’m willing to bet will only raise the number of shootings. Putting stricter federal laws on gun applications including paying for your own psych evaluation similar to those police take which would be valid for X number of years I think is the best start.

oy vey goyim listen to us we know whats good for you

...

I can understand shitty 3rd world countries having mass shootings but how can a great country like the USA have so many mass shootings thats we're just used to it already?

Hey, other part of reddit.

it never not amuses me to see americucks defending their right to bear arms
there are some control to own guns right now, why not fight for revoking them as well? why not own a bazooka or a tank? or a nuclear bomb? what is the difference?
>i have this tzar bomba to defend myself against the king of england

>one guy kills 50 people
>liberals literally cry for gun control
>black hoodlums in Chicago kill 50 people every weekend
>"what are you racist? It's their culture you bigot"

there are 2 million military and law enforcement people in the USA, and at least 100,000,000 private gun owners.

5% of the gun owners would be all that is needed to completely overwhelm the country. unless the ruling elites want to turn the country into Syria.

The point of an armed population is so that the government would HAVE to use the military to enact any draconian measures, which would cause a civil war. An unarmed population on the other hand is 100% at the mercy of police armed with tear gas and rubber bullets.

You can own a tank and bazooka retard.

>be american
>get shot

>be european
>get akbar'd

see
its a cultural thing. there have always been lots of guns in america and there always will be. its the cost of freedom essentially. all the gun laws in the world dont make Detroit, washington dc or the US in general any safer

just in case someone feels the need to read it

I've got something better than a hypothetical.

New York passed an assault weapons registry in 2013.

Approximately 50,000 gun owners registered their weapons and approximately one million refused

That's a million felons, in one of the most liberal states in the country, openly flouting the law for four years and counting. Why hasn't NY done anything about it?

cause they have so much fucking guns

what about muh tzar bomba!?
>REEE COMMUNISTS TAKING AWAY MY 2ND AMANDMENT RIGHTS

>a group of "patriots" are caught by the secret service weeks before the president gives a speech
>planned their whole bullshit on the 'darkweb' while looking at kiddie porn
>found with some junk ar 15s they 3d printed
>probably would have blown up their hands and hurt many in the crowd before shit went down
>anyway sent to gitmo
>presidents approval ratings go up tho
>as often happens with assassination attempts by idiots

Because it really isn’t that many people in the grand scheme of things. The USA is huge both in land mass and population. There’s thousands of murders a year. 50 is a barely a drop in the water

at least youre allowed to defend yourself in america. in europe you just have to get run over by a truck or blown up then apologize for being racist

>tfw everyone arguing for gun control doesnt have a gun
POOR, POOR WAGEKEKIES CANT AFFORD A BLASTY BLASTY

fucking cis white male

>great country like the USA
It's just like one or two decent cities, not the whole country.

It's amazing. Not even the stuff you'd see on the Daily Stormer is as bad as these modified headlines.
Yet I don't foresee Buzzfeed or Salon having their hosting taken away any time soon by some virtue-signaling Silicon Valley faggot on a crusade against "racism".

It really is true that defining "hate speech" is 100% about the race it's directed towards, rather than the speech itself.

because they arent funny

...

>corrupted 3rd world shithole
>IT'S BECAUSE THEY HAVE GUN CONTROL
you didn't even try

A similar law passed a year earlier in Connecticut. 51,000 people registered their weapons and 300,000 refused.

dictators are usually surrounded by bulletproof glass and armed guards and snipers

So you think the country is going to be overwhelmed by people with handguns and birdshot? Let’s try to remember the assets that the US military has

I love when millionaires who live in gated off mansions and have armed security details tell me I need to hand over my guns and allow refugees to move into my neighborhood

When Tump does it it's politicizing a tragedy, when Hillary does it it's YASSS QUEEN activism.

do people not understand that a mentally ill individual committing a mass shooting does not make them a terrorist?

By definition doesn't terrorism have to promote an agenda?

>yfw that black woman is camouflaged and blends into the background

no judgement, just memes

so much this. another pet cause of the modern left is that way too many people are in prison. ban guns and create newer, strict laws and you are creating millions more prisoners

did they refuse or did they simple not know/forgot that they should've registered?

Everywhere that has gun control is a third world shithole.

What laws could have been passed before this happened that would have prevented this?

protip: none

What king of england?

It's not even comparable. Europe's problem is international as much as domestic and its solution relies heavily on international relations as well as various humanitarian aspects (refugees and whatnot).

US has no fucking excuse to not solve its domestic violence with guns, except for, well, muh capitali- huh, freedom yes.

>be American
>get shot
Every time

Most of them are false flag attacks, though.

terrorism is based on religion

and yet the only place such massacres are happening on earth is the one country where it is free as fuck to own them

this

They made guns illegal, confiscated them from the populace, then went full-blown police state because people couldn't oppose.

That's what happens without guns. Look at England, your third world country argument doesn't even work. They literally arrest people there for expressing opinions.

This.

It's always this same shit with liberals, not just with guns.

They preach about America and other countries needing to house and feed countless more refugees while owning 8 mansions.
They preach about racial "diversity" while living in gated, heavily-vetted all-white communities.

Progressivist laws are for peasants to suffer under, not the high & mighty celebrity elite.

Not to shoot up and kill 50+ people, hick.

>strawman: the post

so you favor the Pyrrhic Victory. Where the government goes full retard on the civilian populace. Thus proving the pro gun side right.

My cousin lives in sandy hook and I find this comment grossly offensive

Why are americans afraid of their own government?

notice how it says gun control and not gun ban

yeah, nothing like that happens in france, england europe or the entirety of the middle east. fuck off

...

literally nobody ever says that
they just appeal for may be at least grenade launchers to be not purchasable by ordinary people at walmart

>shoot missiles at some towns because some people with guns
Enjoy not getting re elected

t bh, you're simplifying it. Banning things doesn't work that well, as shown by this very incident. It would take a massive, long-term cultural turn to stop mass shootings. No short-term "solution" or law that will help.

Freedom isn't free. Go get your daughters raped by muslims in England if you don't like it.

>even The Intercept is pushing intersectionality

I mean, don't you think it's a bit fishy that this dude with no history of gun violence, or even gun ownership, much less connections with any radical group, did something like this alone? It kind of seems like a frame up job to me, but I guess we'll find out soon enough.

that's fucking retarded

Show me proof of WalMart selling grenade launchers. I'll wait.

>no comebacks the sad reality

SHALL

3 of them are gay and 2 of them arent even american

Better safe than sorry, radical commie liberals want our guns so they can proceed with their plans

meaning, only rich celebrities should be able to afford to protect themselves. some asian guy should have his guns taken away and not be allowed to protect his liquor store in the ghetto

Your cousin is a CIA actor, deal with it nerd.

No I’m just a realist and believe that if an event were to really divide the people from the government in such a way as to instigate a populace revolt the US government would be able to quell it very easily regardless of casualties. Plus it’d solve the unemployment problem

Americans are killing each other, Europeans are being killed by foreigners.

>and yet the only place such massacres are happening on earth