What's Sup Forumss opinion on Pol Pot?
What's Sup Forumss opinion on Pol Pot?
Other urls found in this thread:
Dude was an idiot.
>killing the intellectuals and reverting to a complete agricultural society
What could go wrong?
Probably the most insane person to ever lead a country.
Isn't this boarf named after him?
Was a man with a vision.
>pol
degenerates
>pot
degenerate
Degenerate.
His worst crime was his looks.
Worse than Iran and N Korea?
Pol Pot was way worse than everything happening in Iran. Korea is debatable, year for year Pol Potter was worse but North Korea has been doing it longer and over a few rulers.
Sup Forums pot is based, not like other pot
What went wrong with his plans?
>Cambodian intellectualls
mass murdering gook who rots in hell
this guy just took genocide to somewhat comic levels
"kill everyone who wears glasses!"
it was pretty much just random
Another reason why communism will never work
Does he still hold the record for killing the highest percentage of his own populace? Or did some African country ever pass him?
Drumpf is going to do it
...
He was completely and utterly insane. Genociding people in the name of progress is justifiable logically, if perhaps not morally. This asshole just went and killed everybody who was part of making Cambodia an industrialized civilization, then killed everybody who looked unhappy with where things were leading, then he started starving the rest of them to death while they did hard labor until the Vietnamese invaded and accidentally saved the shittiest shithole in Asia from achieving communist utopia.
THIS INTELECTUALS WILL NEVER SUPPORT EM. SO HE KILL EM ALL.
Reminder that swedish "intellectuals" furiously supported him and some still deny his crimes
THIS PEOPLE WAS THAT DEGENERATE TO LOSE WAR TO AGRACULTURE WORCKERS
>He was completely and utterly insane.
He wasn't. He was merely bringing communist ideas to their logical end, that's why many european leftists adored him.
killing 25% of your population is a good way to battle overpopulation tho.
ALL THE INDUSTRY DO NEAR NOTHING TO LAND PRODUCTIVITY IN HOT AZIA. SO MAX POLULATION WILL BE IN PURE AGRACULTURE SOCETY
Saloth Sar was a great man. With his FUNK allies, he rid Phnom Penh of the rats nest of counter-revolutionary Lon Nol.
Unfortunately for him, social imperialism reared its ugly head.
Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol Pot Pol PotPol Pot Pol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol PotPol Pot
More like Sup Forums Pot hehehehe
kinda like this guy?
That guy engaged the reverse gear when he felt his ass was about to get burned. Pol Pot never wavered and got BTFO by vietcong.
Celebrated unintelligence and a lifestyle that leads to poverty, killed off and chased away the smart people, and destroyed his own country. I'm sure Sup Forums will come up with some reason this man was actually a redpilled hero rather than a shortsighted egomaniac.
Thwarted by the Jews
>t. Stalin
most intellectuals are liberal cucks anyways
Mao Zedong is the winner by far.
>egomaniac
SAME LIKE YOU. BUT YOU JUST CANADIAN RETARD
an atheist
>mengistu
fucking piece of shit, hopefully he's burning in hell right now
Looks like pepe
>pol pot
His name literally means poisonus corn in khmer.
Like I don't think people should be too surprised at the unanimous hate of Pol Pot.
Based on the IQ thread here, everybody considers themselves intellectuals.
I would bet a lot of you geeks browsing are wearing glasses.
He's a commie, not even a liberal democrat, a full blown commie.
His genocide wasn't done in the interest of eugenics, but in the interests of promoting communism, so not even literal eugenicists agree with him.
History hasn't exactly proved his ideas were good.
You basically have to be an out of you mind fucking retarded communist to possibly think pol pot did nothing wrong.
I have a weird fascination with Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. I've read everything in English I could find and about half of what I've been able to obtain in French.
Just a few of the oddities:
1. The world never heard of him until well after the Khmer Rouge took power. He managed to exist completely behind the scenes.
2. Most CAMBODIANS had also never heard of him until the Khmer Rouge began a crude personality cult to try to whip up nationalist frenzy against the Vietnamese.
3. American, Australian, British and French intellectuals were utterly charmed by the Khmer Rouge and you can find tons of articles they wrote about the Khmer Rouge's "brilliant" plans for an agricultural state. Most of them still have careers to this day, it hasn't hurt their reputation at all.
4. For some reason, all of the especially VICIOUS communist parties were lead by teachers. The Cambodians probably had even more teachers than the others, which makes their persecution of the educated class even more astonishing.
5. You can read all of these books about him and still not have the vaguest idea of what he was like. Until his "trial" at the end of his life, he was just always slightly out of focus in photographs and it was that way in his life too.
More proof Communism is shit.
can h e make soup dumpring?
...
POL POT WAS TO LATE COSE INFANTRY ALREADY HAVE NO WAR POWER.
POL POT WAS TO EARLY COSE GOVERMENT NOT DEGENERATED ENOUGTH
Once in a 100 threads someone who actually knows something about the topic posts, instead of just forming an opinion on a Wikipedia summary.
Pls tell more
>>mengistu
No hes alive
PACКATAЛИ TAHКAMИ AГPAPHЫЙ КOMMУHИCTИЧECКИЙ PAЙ HAХУЙ
1. They split the country up into fiefdoms after the war, so the "ruralization" was carried out very unevenly in different places.
2. It's not really clear that starving your own population actually meets the criteria of "genocide" as it's been defined in international law. For this reason foreigners tend to focus on the Khmer Rouge's persecution of minorities, most of whom are still pretty much hated in Cambodia.
3. Like Enver Hoxha, time in France and connections with the (Stalinist) French Communist Party kind of fucked up Pol Pot even more. It's weird that so many nasty piece of shit communists floated through France, whose communist party was always sort of a joke.
4. Without Chinese support, the Khmer Rouge wouldn't have amounted to much. The Gang of Four though the Khmer Rouge were wonderful, they both hated the Vietnamese but more importantly the Chinese imported tons of "exotic goods" from Khmer Rouge-controlled Cambodia.
The "exotic goods" were often parts of endangered animals used in traditional Chinese medicine -- things like Tiger penises used to cure impotence.
Literally millions of Cambodians starved so Chairman Mao's cronies could eat tiger dicks.
5. His wife went insane at the height of the mass murder campaign. Pretty much all of the Khmer Rouge heavies were intermarried with each other, so this was a massive problem, because she was sister in law to another member of the inner circle, Ieng Sary (aka "Brother Number Three"). It just adds to the obscurity about him because while she outlived him, she spent almost all of it locked in rooms in the jungle, raving mad.
> Percentage
He still has good position I think
whatever the fuck this jungle nigger said i guess
DO LERN AT LEAST ONE NOT DEGENERATED LAGIAGE, TARDED CILLEDGE LEVEL RETARD
he killed everyone
well we wont know until we try it
do you know what percentage means?
MAO THE DONG
A great reminder that commies are scum and need to be purged
Literally "R9k:the dictator" along with staging his own "beta uprising" and "kill all normies".
>beta uprising
THAT WAS HAPPEN MANY TIMES IN HISTORY. AND WILL HAPPEN MANY TIMES
I honestly have to ask because I can't make sense of the stuff you're raving about but are you pro or con Pol Pot?
ITS A HOLIDAY IN CAMBODIA
ITS TOUGH KID BUT ITS LIFE
A HOLIDAY IN CAMBODIA
DON'T FORGET TO PACK A WIFE
can someone translate this moonspeak to civilized talk?
POL POT WAS LOSE BUT IT WAS TOP ACHIVMENT OF THIS COUNTRY
He killed one of my uncles :(
>genocide
That's why various scholars have embraced the term "democide" as a catchall for dictators who slaughter masses of people for reasons other than race/ethnicity/religion.
>percentage
I know Mao has the highest raw total. Pol Pot offed roughly 25% of his country's people.
IT MEAN YOU IS COLLEGE LEVEL RETARD AND MUST SHITUP
this. They even had state arranged marriages
And white guys are still the most evil?
Yeah but acknowledging a "genocide" is happening triggers all kinds of things in international treaties. In Cambodia, they badly wanted it to be "genocide" because they didn't believe the Hun Sen government (he was an ex-Khmer Rouge who defected very early to the Vietnamese & participated in the invasion that deposed the KR) wouldn't prosecute it effectively. "Genocide" would be how they would move in to claim jurisdiction and prosecute the surviving leaders themselves.
For some reason, globalists get hard ons at the thought of prosecuting "genocide." It's like virtue signaling on steroids.
>Killing bourgeoisie
Fixed.
Cunt didn't fuck around and you can't knock him for that
fuck off melboune
more?
bump