Was Chapter 5 really needed? Pacing would be better and the chapter itself didn't bring nothing of importance, since the audience already knows the gang came before the Hangman and killed the locals. Also, the slow motion wasn't really needed the third time.
Other than that, it's a great watch and the whole cast was almost perfect. Goggins and Jackson were wonderful and seeing their relationship develop throughout it was nice.
did you really like his?
Honestly I could barely sit through it. Who the fucking fuck was I supposed to identify with or care about?
>Was Chapter 5 really needed?
Yes, as the blu-ray release of this film does not include the intermission
>Not likeing a movie because you can't suplant yourselfnin the heros role.
Go back to watching capeshit you fucking normie.
I sure liked the part where Tarantino decided to humiliate white men by shooting a scene in which a nigger forces a dying white man to suck his dick.
Never going to watch another one of his flicks again
I've first seen it when it came out and now I rewatched it a moment ago, so you can say I'm fond of it.
>who the fucking fuck was I supposed to identify or care about?
About the white man slayer or to be sheriff.
What?
Shooting it on 65mm was the worst fucking waste of this movie. Have about twenty minutes of exterior or stylish shots in a goddamn three hour movie that the rest of takes place in a fucking stage play. Tarantino is a hack who knows nothing about cinematography or visual invention, only conversations and ripping off scenes from other movies.
I know it's a meme, but people who unironically think Tarantino is some nigger loving fuck are stupid, since Jackson is a wretched individual and is displayed as one.
that entire flick wasn't necessary.
How so?
You're probably one those faggots who can't pay attention to anything longer than an hour and a half
> suplant
buy a dictionary
The guy goes to Black Lives Matter rallies for fucks sake. Of course he's a nigger loving cuck and that scene was the figurative cherry on top.
I'm pretty sure that Jackson was lying so he could get the general to reach for his gun and then kill him, is this so hard to understand?
It's the symbolism of the scene that matters you retard. Of course it's not real, nothing of it is real, it's a fucking fiction movie.
What symbolism?
He wanted the general to get mad, so he insulted him and his dead son so he could kill him, end of story.
I think you are projecting a little
How so? Jackson played a character that's quite sick and is shown so, even though he's black and gets to live at the end.
Racial relations and social commentary symbolism you dense fuck. The narrator even opens the next scene with "Despite of how captivated we are by black dicks in white mouths, we will continue with the rest of the story now..." or something like this. Seriously, are you blind to see this.
...or maybe the narrator wanted the audience to STOP thinking about a scene where someone is suddenly sucking Samuel L Jackson's dick while he laughs like a maniac and to get back to the story at hand(killing the general)
Not him but user, that is clearly a sarcastic statement. Surely you do not actually believe that all the characters were written to have been captivated by the idea of black dicks in white mouths.
Jennifer Jason Leigh's voice was a nice addition to the overall comfy feel the film had.