Why are so many famous actors manlets?

>Martin Freeman: 169 cm
>Kit Harrington: 173 cm
>Tom Cruise: 170 cm
>Robert Downey Jr.: 174 cm
>Johnny Depp: 178 cm
>Daniel Radcliffe: 165 cm
>Peter Dinklage: 135 cm

Other urls found in this thread:

slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/03/20/the_brutality_of_the_stone_age_only_1_man_had_children_for_every_17_women.html
youtube.com/watch?v=DR_MZy7vBTo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

Well, think of the people who get into acting in high school - is it tall, athletic jocks or is it smallish guys who aren't good at sports?

...

Because manlets are fucking amazing and you don't deserve us

Yeah, but it requires balls and lots of self confidence to get onto a stage and act in front of a bunch of strangers. That's something manlets usually lack.

At my school, is was mostly the literal fags and women who did acting.

...

>all these guys standing on their toes to appear tallers
wtf are they thinking that no one will notice?

...

...

...

>He is too small for me
What did she mean by this?

now thats embarrassing.

what am i supposed to be seeing here

>standing on their tiptoes

kek never noticed that before.

That bitch is really fucking tall though

...

Every girl in that room seems taller than him.

No wonder he cheated

...

Hollywood is full of fags

Post more manlets plz

...

He is lucky he has good looks.

Peter Dinklage is quite tall for an actual dwarf t b h. He's also better looking than most of them.

>RDJ - 173cm
bruh, he is 170cm

I don't think this is necessarily THE reason for it, but from a director or cinematographer's perspective, you have more visual options with a short actor than a tall one.

With a cast of manlets, you can frame your shot however the hell you want, and stack your actors up on appleboxes to put them exactly where you want in frame. You can make creative choices to get nice images of your sets, backdrops or landscapes. You can choose high or low camera angles for expressive, visual storytelling purposes. For all intents and purposes, a manlet actor is height-adjustable, and the more options you have, the better.

With a very tall actor, you're stuck with very few camera angles to get his/her face in the frame. Unless you've got time (and an appropriate location) to dig a hole for the actor to stand in, you don't really have many choices for the background of the shot, or to use high/low angles to express the emotions of the scene.

tl;dr It's always faster and easier to raise up a manlet, than to lower a giant.

google says 174

Because you can't Gay Casting Couch a normally sized male.

...

why is the average hollywood actor 6 foot then?

Lmao the fapping scene happened to me

...

What is kneeling?

an american sport

Because manlets literally "act out" to compensate and get attention. Shorter men take on very performative attributes.

Something that only works if the character remains still for the whole shot, and only if you frame from the waist up, and only if he's REALLY tall and there are no other actors in the shot

>6 foot
On their imdb page, sure. In real life, nope.

Vince Vaughn is fucking huge. The guy is like 6'6.

They lie about their height the way actresses lie about their age.

so all these self proclaimed 6 foot actors are actually 5'6 manlets?

remember 5'7-6'0" is the middle 70% of all men

The mike lowered for the short guy

women are mostly genetically inferior
this discussion is supposed to shame men?
i've seen more flat asses in yoga pants, and more flat chests than i have ever seen short men

like, imagine being born and having the breasts of a 12 year old, and pretending thats okay for the rest of your life. that's got to be depressing, to know youll never be able to adequately provide for your children

Imagine having millions and millions of dollars in your bank account, 20 cars, 10 boats, 3 mansions, but you still somehow give a fuck about your height compared to others.
It boggles my fucking mind.

because it doesn't matter

Is Beiber getting taken to the manlet pit?

6 foot is king of the manlets

>women are mostly genetically inferior
Doesn't matter. if the superior males are allowed to breed more frequently, the super males genes will flourish.

slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/03/20/the_brutality_of_the_stone_age_only_1_man_had_children_for_every_17_women.html

>6'0", 5'11", 5'11"

ayy i see it now thanks
funny how disquieted they both look

...

>cm
Why are so many fa/tv/irgins europoors?

youtube.com/watch?v=DR_MZy7vBTo

The original podcast thing is interesting enough, remember listening to it ages ago.

>Robert Downey Jr.: 174 cm
Stop.
Susan Downey: 160 cm
It looks like he is like 169 cm.

>google is above being (((bribed))) by manlets

Even with all that money at the end of the day you have to look yourself in the mirror and live with what you see.

damm look at the size of those soles

Same kind of shoes Robert "I'm Down Here" Downey Jr. wears.

He's aged like absolute shit

>why do you care about accurate measurements lmao
You can't actually be serious running around saying "I-I'm 5'7 three quarters!"

>RDJs "shoes"

>manlets literally "act out" to compensate and get attenti--

There's a difference between manlets acting out, i.e.
>manlets when will they ever learn
and someone actually going batshit insane like good old Carrey.

Gain over 5". Fool your friends.

I assume its easier to use manlets because they take up less film?

>>Daniel Radcliffe: 165 cm

Jesus Christ what do they feed to child actors

cocaine and alcohol are one helluva drug

kek

Because you can fake tallness on screen. Duh. It's easy mode in person, it's not worth much in a performance.

>>Robert Downey Jr.: 174 cm
in his dreams. He's 170 tops. Not that anyone would know since he sleeps with lifts on

>You'll never get your sides rubbed lovingly by an Amazon.

not in modern society
keep reference to stone age for your delusions of grandeur

real alphas wont even touch inadequate women

mostly like omegas/betas pretending they alpha online jerking off to faux alpha persona they want to front

"hey! I'm walking here" *punches hubcap*

What's the cut off for Manlet?

I always thought 160cm until Sup Forums started mentioning it

Too close to home dubs McKenzie delet this

holy shit RDJ is mentally ill

>pick out short actors
>ignore tall ones
>why are so many actors short?????
Are you an actual retard?

You literal idiots. Malnets are preferred by directors because thecnichal reasons.

It's easier to take the shot of a manlet than a tall guy.

I'm 185 cm, and I always feel like a manlet when I go to a nightclub (country where everyone is a giant, even girls are almost my height), I cant image how it is for people who are 175 and under.

...

For normal people, males are noticeably short at like 5'7" or less.
On Sup Forums, anyone below 6' is a manlet.

>I always thought 160cm until Sup Forums started mentioning it
What fucking country are you in, some Asian one? Manlet cutoff is 180 in the West.

Bieber is literally the only person on this planet immune to the effects of manletism.

This one isn't fair but he is suppose to be 5'8, which means in reality he is probably even shorter.

Balkanigger is that you my friend?

Your insecurity causes you to only notice people taller than you, there are plenty of manlets and average height people any place in the world.

Uk and I'm taller than most people I see and I'm only 176cm

It also mean Rock is lying about his height as well.

why is this so erotic?

yeah brah, hello from bosnia

Haha. Everyone is a manlet next to Shak

>ywn be manhandled by a giantess

...

Holy shit, he could feed africa with those rubber heels.

Life is so unfair for short people, I'm 6'1" and I'm getting constant shit by friends over how short I'm

obviously dwayne is a manlet

LOL. No. He's clearly insecure.

Most of these are due to them either getting their start as child stars (and are hired because they are small and cute), or nepotism. RDJ wouldn't be anything without his father.