Free speech is dead in America

Free speech is dead prove me wrong Sup Forums.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=shMdHHYpLpY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger

nigger

Hillary assassina-

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

N

I

G

if one person can get so many people riled up, and so many governments pissed off, i htink our free speech is alive and kicking. 'cause he wouldn't be, if free speech didnt exist

What's going on lmao

...

Is Weezy our guy?

fuck of kike.

G
E
R

If free speech is your ability to call people fags, then its alive and well.

NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER

as long as you can say mean things without going to jail, we have free speech

Woah look at all the Reddit users.

woah, look at this faggot

Hmmmmmm hmmmmmmm Blebbit b8ing itself

It's bad senpai. Most libcucks today have been brainwashed to the point where they don't even understand how free speech works any more.

Take the Kaepernick case for example. If you search his name on kikebook, I guarantee--GUARANTEE--that 99% of the people defending him will make some reference to "muh freedom of speech he's allowed to protest peacefully why are you criticizing him for this." Libtards clearly have some vague idea that the mechanism of free speech is in danger in our society today (thanks to their own absurd need for coddling and safe spaces, of course).

The thing is, they only have about an insecure 2nd grader's understanding of free speech, i.e. "Free speech allows me to say whatever I want so I'm going to spout a bunch of incendiary bullshit and you can't do anything hahahahaha." Whenever somebody's freedom of speech is actually threatened (cf. basically every public university in California) and they invoke the 1st amendment as a defense, libcucks project their own frustrated conception of "freedom of speech as bigotry" on the "offender" because they're too perpetually oversocialized to see it as anything else.

But back to Karpernick. The libtards have taken up a frightening habit of trying to parody every single argument their opponents make (probably because they're insecure about their own doublethink). They'd have you believe it's an issue of free speech--they paint the average detractor as saying, "OMG how disrespectful Kaepernick shouldn't be allowed to do that he should be cut right away!!1!1!" There was a single quote from some anonymous GM--honestly, there's a good chance it was completely made up--that got so much airplay you'd have thought everybody and their grandma felt that way.

But the reality was, very few of Kaepernick's detractors saw it as a freedom of speech issue. Most people just saw it for what it was: a desperate, disrespectful, pathetic, virtue-signaling attention grab from a washed up QB

(CONT)
who couldn't stand being out of the spotlight for more than a couple years. For decades, standing to honor the flag before the national anthem (American in France lol) has been a time when we can put our differences aside and remind ourselves of the values we hold in common and the future we're striving for. When Kaepernick sat down (iirc he wasn't even kneeling the first time, just sitting on the bench like a lazy bum), he was effectively saying, "nah, count me out on this one. Y'all are too messed up for me to care about national pride."

Nigga, do you think MLK ever sat down for the national anthem? Like him or not, the man understood that the only hope blacks ever had of integration was by appealing to tried and true American values ("I have a DREAM" for fuck's sake). The flag represents not only what we are as a people, but more importantly, what we hope to be. It's bigger than any localized issue, bigger than whatever problems you might have with the government.

But of course, that's the way of the left nowadays. When your livelihood is provided by government handouts--when an individualistic, fragmentary me-first morality is legislated on a national level--when the media spends more time telling you what to fear than what to believe, and the government panders to those fears to prevent you from seeing the bigger issues--in short, when the state and its crony media are responsible for virtue formation and moral education, when the state replaces the family and the church, is when this type of shit happens. You stop believing in the state and IN THE SAME BREATH look to the state to fix those problems.

Free speech? It's not a matter of free speech at all. And that's what's so dangerous, because when free speech is actually taken away, most of these fuckers won't know the difference.

Thinking that the freedom to use a racial slur is enough of an evidence to suggest that there is, in fact, freedom of speech existing is utterly foolish. (((They))) will happily oblige an give the masses the term 'nigger' so you can be duped into believing that you also have the right to criticize the elites (which you don't posses)

Also, NIGGER

Totally agree that that's where we're headed fampai. I don't think we're quite there yet, though. That's why getting Trump into office is so damn important. If Hillary wins, it's all over. See

church morality is Jewish morality

>I don't think we're quite there yet, though

Of course ware are already there yet. We care more about the right to say nigger than about the right to point out the real mistakes.
Even here on Sup Forums we are more obsessed with making fun of kangz instead of naming the jew.

"Cultural Marxism" doesn't exist you dumbfuck.
youtube.com/watch?v=shMdHHYpLpY

Yes and no. Christianity is both a continuation of Jewish ideology and explicitly anti-Jewish--with both aspects being mixed to various degrees in different communities today. There is some hooknose influence, yes, but they're not one and the same. For instance, Christians don't necessarily shill the same "eternally oppressed, we need reparations, give us Israel" narrative that the Jews do--in fact, Christian tradition celebrates those who give themselves up to suffering freely, i.e. martyrs, over those who bitch and moan about it.

But the point I was trying to make was more about the importance of secondary institutions than anything. Have you read Tocqueville at all? Pretty informative stuff re the need for A church/neighborhood community for virtue formation. The government shouldn't be doing that shit, because the government's best interest is to create cogs that fit into a system

Absolutely. But what's most frustrating is that the government didn't take it from you. Your own peers did. You did it to yourselves. The thought police is a volunteer organisation with unimaginable power.

I mean, we're there in the sense that we'd be pretty vulnerable to such rights being taken away. But they haven't really been taken away yet--at least not in many countries.

However, I think it's more likely that policing on this issue develops without direct government intervention--much like Milo's Twitter ban, which was driven by consumerism/popular opinion (Twitter could either ban Milo or lose followers/investors). Of course, if things continue in the direction they're headed, government and social media will merge into one and the same thing. There's already a tremendous amount of pressure not to post righty shit on social media, it's certainly scary to think where things could go

Freedom is an illusion. The "rights" we have can be stripped away.

if free speech was banned, why hasn't Candlejack been able to take me away y-..