What is with these polls? >Inb4 DURR POLLS ARE SKEWED! In reality: Qunnipac swings right. It's landline heavy. Has Clinton at 5+ LA Times, has been a huge anomaly, it's polling is by far the furthest from the mean. Has Trump at +5. NBC is usually on the nose, has Clinton at +3. ABC as well, has an A- from 538, and has Clinton at +8. Reuters is well known good, though does swing Dem a little. Clinton at +1.
How the hell are these national results all over the place within the general interval of a week?! >Real answers pls, not "CTR!" "POLLS ARE RIGGED!"
Thomas Scott
And Clinton is still slipping nationally and losing ground in swing states. But keep shilling, gotta earn them shekels
Dylan Howard
idk op but i want you to check these quads
Brandon Jones
>"We're losing by less!" Nice non-answer. "Slipping nationally", specifically how? Trump was higher than this in July. We're not entering new territory.
Colton Moore
reminder that ~20% of the population has not made up their mind, or will neither be voting for Clinton nor trump
Clinton is only ahead about 2 points with a 3-4 point margin of error
Jason Rogers
She's been trending down in national polls for weeks. 3 of RCP's polls don't even cover the date where Clinton fell. They're practically neck and neck already, and she's going to lose even more ground.
Xavier Wood
All polls are cooked mate.
I frankly don't even pay attention to that shit anymore.
Austin Murphy
Some outlets are doing blatant push polling (like WaPo), some are polling according to outdated voter demographics, others are using 2015 registration numbers.
Basically, numbers are all over the place since it's a volatile cycle and methodologies are all over the place.
I personally wouldn't put too much stock into them, leaving aside pollster user's claim that Dem oversampling is returning post-debates, numbers before debates in general might as well just be a coin toss.
Landon Jenkins
Black folk should accept the bell curve and apply for disability.
Jace Jones
remember.........you dont like national polls........you concentrate on state polls........which she's losing
Benjamin Campbell
...
Carter Ross
Who gives a fuck about statistics? I meme, Trump wins. It's never failed.
Jeremiah Cook
Electorally they're not neck n' neck, Clinton still with her powerhouse states has 272 needed to win. In general, though, she has been going down in some purple states.
Jeremiah Taylor
>polls >before the debates >in an election where only 5 or 6 states matter Lmao
Oliver Peterson
Check the dates on the polls, and throw out any that were completed before 9/11
Nolan Rodriguez
It's quite simple.
Those people making those polls? They majored in retard studies and are most likely some form of nigger.
They're incompetent, and they will be the first to go on the day of the rope.
James Cox
You should pay attention. Because if they rigged, then that means they will use them to "justify" rigging the actual election. Believe me, with the corruption that has been exposed, there is a high chance these fucks will rig the voting machines.
Gavin Morgan
losing ground, not losing. Trump is technically losing, Clinton's already at 272. Unless he does something in N.H., Pennsylvania, Wisconsin or Colorado. Meanwhile states where she's been +2 at are sliding to Trump below 1 point. Practically useless pre-debates.
Camden Sanders
Liberal pollsters want Trump to appear to be ahead to energize the base and maximise turnout.
Right leaning pollsters want Clinton to appear slightly ahead to minimize Dem turnout, but not so far ahead as to demoralize Trump supporters.
Luke Allen
Trump will win.
Michael Brown
They're 266 to 272. I guarantee that's going to change
Zachary Taylor
Unless he gets the states I mentioned, all of whom she has strong leads in. His *best* bet is Clinton at 272.
