Rlly make u thank

...

>What is context

Oh look this reposted again for the gorillionth time.

>America is not great because Obama is a fucking nigger that flooded our country with shitskins and doubled the national debt

or

>America is not great because muh nigga got shot by dem poleece n sheeit

>Trump: and we're going to make it better
>Kaperspick: and black people should be able to fuck up whatever they want with no repercussions

Wew!

>Americas not great and if you elect me I will try to make it great again


>America is shit because police are bad so I will refuse to stand during the national anthem at sports events where I am paid entirely too much money


These are totally the same.

>America is not great because there are too many brown people and they're scary and the economy totally hasn't recovered during Obama's turn

or

>America is not great because some of our police force shot citizens before they could receive a fair trial, usually unjustifiably

See, I can do it too user

*term

>shot citizens before they could receive a fair trial, usually unjustifiably
You mean before they could reach for their gun, right nigger?

cuck style

>Improve the economy and restore the middle class

YEAH!!

>Cops shoot black men at higher rates than other demographics because of institutional racism.

BOO!!

The first statement is correct.

Ray Rice hammers his woman. YEAH!
Kapernack protests police. Boo!
Fucked up.

'Muh dick...

Cartoons like this are what's responsible for the rise of autism.

>America has a problem, let's fix it
>America sux because im black and black people need more gibsmedat

>America is not great, but I want to make it great again

>WE WUZ KANGZS N SHEEIT MANEEEEEE AMERICA AIN'T NO GREAT CUNTRY YA KNOW WHAT IM SAYIN

>usually unjustifiably

3% isn't 'usual'

>black people are incapable of civilization.
>they kill everything and are completely unpredictable

>the police don't take chances with them as a result.

Yeah, i'm careful around boiling water and i'm not careful about cold water.

Am i a temperatureacist?

Why doesn't he protest the 1% by rejecting his paycheque?

Yep, because most of them didn't even have guns.

Unemployment is down, inflation is slightly more tolerable. The economy isn't perfect, but in everyday terms, it's considerably better. As for brown people, I guess it's subjective, so go ahead and fear every random stranger who isn't obviously of European descent.

>and the economy totally hasn't recovered during Obama's turn

It hasn't, actually. It's doing terrible this year. You were being sarcastic, I assume?

CTR IS FLIPPING THE FUCK OUT BECAUSE OF THE KKKILLARY KKKLINTON KKKAMPAIGN KKKATASTROPHE!

I'VE NEVER SEEN ASSHOLES THIS RAVAGED IN MY ENTIRE LIFE

America's not great and we should fix it
vs
America's not great so gibs me dat

>Yep, because most of them didn't even have guns

This is irrelevant. The police don't know that before they can search a suspect. If a suspect resists and makes sudden movements, the use of deadly force isn't out of the question.

Worse than 2008 and 2009?

It's virtually the same as growth in 2008.

The crisis itself wasn't the fault of any one person anyway though. Obviously the economy was going to rebound somewhat after the crisis was over.

>America's not great, but I love my country and I want you to help me make it great again
vs.
>America's not great, dey be 'pressin us niggas fuck you rayciss-ass pigs

yeah but yours is a lie.

Except pretty much everything that police officers don't give permission to do can be deadly for the civilian in question. If there's a total gap in what police officers expect and how a considerable amount of people behave, we need to take steps to correct one end.
Also, a few of the victims didn't even resist to the point where deadly force was the best choice to immediately make.

the difference is that football nigger acts like a fag and trump doesnt

This is another thing. Trump is at least trying to offer solutions, whether you agree with them or not. What solutions does the athlete who was told to make an impotent gesture by his media handlers have?

Fair enough, but I do think that the current economic concerns are somewhat overblown.

I said the same thing a different way. Did I misinterpret anything, or does the way I worded it just bother you?

My point is, not everything is black and white here. Irrational and thoughtful, considerate people exist on both sides of these debates.

This is also true, but I do think that simply protesting has its own set of merits.

>Did I misinterpret anything
>usually unjustifiably

There ya go.

>Except pretty much everything that police officers don't give permission to do can be deadly for the civilian in question.

Putting your hands in the air? Getting on the ground with your hands behind your head? I'm not sure what you think they don't allow that's unreasonable.

>Also, a few of the victims didn't even resist to the point where deadly force was the best choice to immediately make.

There will always be outliers and times police are in the wrong. Even if we were to count both the use of illegitimate and legitimate force by cops though, the problem is not as pervasive as the media likes to hype it as. Same with mass shootings. It's a classic diversion tactic and agenda-pushing. Notice how the media never proposes realistic solutions. It's always some intangible specter like "The System" that can never be addressed with viable solutions. For some reason the Executive Branch is never held responsible even though this problem falls under their jurisdiction.

While I agree with that part, I was in that instance trying to present the most common cohesive liberal argument for the sake of balance.

>Unemployment is down
Welfare is not a profession

>Fair enough, but I do think that the current economic concerns are somewhat overblown.

It's not so much a US problem but a world problem. The world economic system never fully recovered from 2008, and it's slowly stagnating.

I have an honest question about all of this. Trolls can skip it and not bother responding.
Are whites who stand when people of color are taking a knee showing a lack of allyship? Is it a microaggression, or worse, overt racism? What should PoC think of PoC who choose not to kneel?

this seriously made me contemplate

It has merits for the establishment and whatever reasons they have for pushing it so hard, certainly.

Why do people even bother responding to these types of threads?

Not saying it's unreasonable. My main point is that there is a discoordination between what people and what police think is acceptable in that situation. What someone thinks is okay (ie grabbing their license or something without explaining to the officer what they're doing) isn't necessarily what the officer thinks is typical behavior. Whether police need to get on civilians' page or visa versa is a matter of opinion, but it requires some institutional reform to correct. I do feel that Obama has missed this point somewhat.

It's obvious that these incidents don't happen that often, but we should minimize these situations as much as possible for the sake of a better racial climate. If it doesn't happen, the media can't blame it on something irrational.

That's counted in statistics? Inform me with proof, please. Unless you're memeing to try and disprove my point.

It's an individual protest, and people can have a variety of reasons for deciding not to participate. Getting angrier at the other side harms the message in the first place, as we've seen with BLM to a degree.

Why do people act like this guy is black when he looks very much like a north african semite to me.

>it requires some institutional reform to correct.
Perhaps. Nobody with a large platform seems to say anything concrete about what this means though.

>we should minimize these situations as much as possible for the sake of a better racial climate
Of course it should be minimized, but the racial aspect of this is intentionally played up for effect. The media made it about race from the beginning because that was the narrative they wanted to push. To divide the country on race, to distract from the economy (which all countries have their own narratives of distraction to hide underperformance and anger about economic conditions), was the intent before it was even decided that cops would be the fall guys.

>America is not as great as it used to be.

>America was never great.

Blacks lost half of their wealth in the US from the 2008 financial collapse. Half. There had to be a way to channel that anger. Cops took the blame instead of the culprits in the banks who run the planet.

why the fuck would you ally with a bunch of racist nigger boons?

The racial aspect has been inflated to a crazy degree, and we need to do something to deal with the aftermath and get rid of one of the media's trump cards.

I agree. Luckily the MSM seems to be losing control over the narratives, and people are becoming openly skeptical.

Kapernick is a BLM supporter you dumb faggot. Trump actually wants to make things better.

What was it?

Kapernig wants blacks to be able to own whites as slaves.

CONTEXT YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE