Was he a replicant?

Was he a replicant?

hell no

Yes, fucking pay attention.

he was a real human bean

Did you even watch the movie? They made it clear several time that he was a human being born from a woman.

Not in the movie but in real life.

No. He is a replichumen

He was just a human in peak physical condition because it was the future

>the twist in the original is that Deckard was a repliant all along
>in 2049 K proved to be a real human being and a real hero

pottery

Yes. They make this quite obvious from the start. Otherwise, the entire point of the film is moot.
The fucker walks through a wall ffs.

yes
the guy literally break a birck wall to stop harrison ford from entering the ship
if anything the real question is if there is a single human on the film

He's a human/replicant hybrid born from a womb. Did you even watch the movie?

Clearly and explicitly so

>Blade Runner 2049 Final Cut Ridley Scott Edition
>K is human all along

It's unclear wether he is one or not.

>If I blade run for you, you give me a time and a place. I give you a five-minute window, anything happens in that five minutes and Im yours no matter what. I dont sit in while youre blade running it down. I carry a gun. I blade run.

That whole quote seemed out of place

It was heavily implied but ultimately pretty cool they left it ambiguous.

>human/replicant hybrid
I see someone didn't watch BR to the end.

I chuckled, lad. Well done. Well done. We'll make a Memesman out of you yet!

Several, my precious lad:
>Wallace
>Black guy
>Luv
>Other black guy
>Bald man
>Prostitute
>Computer grill
The list goes on and on. Oooonnnn and ooooonnnn

The third act was a fucking mess. The rebellion shit and Fords whole storyline didn't belong there.

He was a replican.

[after slapping JOI and holding her down]
K: Now, you just got a little boy's father killed. And you almost got us killed. And now you're lying to me. So how about this? From now on, every word out of your mouth is the truth. Or I'm going to hurt you.

He was a RepliCAN.

But then how did he have emotions?

That's why movie was 3/5. Whether he was a replicant or not was too vague

he was a cuck

K: I don't have wheels on my spinner.
JOI: [laughing] Okay.
K: It's one thing you should know about me.

UNDERRATED POST!!!!!!!!

I agree, especially the rebellion part. Deckard was okay but the whole hey heres your daughter was lame. Im glad it gave K a reason to fight for something but still.

He's a Terminator.

This. It's like they knew what powerful scenes they wanted to put in the movie but didn't know how to organize them in a coherent way. The rebellion shit is pointless and if Deckard stays there, in a place he doesn't know with someone with direct ties to Wallas he'll get killed soon.

agreed, this is the only aspect of the film worth discussing.
No idea why any of that was even included.
One character slowly finding out the truth of his world and how it affects him, would have made things simpler and ultimately stronger.

Replicants have emotions. That's the entire.....THAT'S THE ENTIRE POINT.

Are you serious?

But if both replicants and humans have emotions, then it's impossible to tell them apart.

They should have said whether K was a replicant at some point, otherwise we just have to spend the whole movie guessing. It was really distracting.

The replicant army belonged there just to raise the stakes for K, and to create maximum buildup around the crushing revelation that he is not the chosen one after all, since he would have finally been safe and delivered right there if he actually was replicant Jesus.

The story was never really about the replicant rebels or even Deckard finding his daughter, it was always just about K and his existential crisis. Deckard being a character in the movie was kind of unnecessary, but K's interactions with him were very limited anyway. He basically tracked him down / met him, accidentally got him caught, and then went on a solo mission to save him. At the end, K gets wrapped up in some bigger happenings than just what's going on in his own life, but the focus is still always on him, and he does his own thing.

But it doesn't dwell on his existential crisis enough. The rebellion was bad because it introduces a huge plot point right at the very end. I loved all the build up but as soon as he got to that vegas place everything started falling apart. Harrison Ford ruined this film. I wanted K and his existential crisis as he cries for his dead waifu.

Also what the hell happened to the dog. I hope thise fucking replicants didn't eat it.

He was a real human bean.

Was the AI intentionally named after Jerk off instruction videos?

Maybe Rachel had twins? The records show a boy and a girl being born on 6/10/21.

Given it's later part of an ad that seems to strongly suggest its roots are in VR pornography, I'd say yeah.

Deckard mixed up the records so nobody could find her.

Maybe listing her as having died from the disease was the mix up he meant.

Freysa only describes one child being born; a female.

who cares. the movie was crap. overrated as fuck

t. plebs. the rebellion shit would have been stupid if it was important at all. fords storyline would have been stupid if it were the focus at all. both were just tools to get K to have his character arc, which is the entire point of the movie.

if you didnt notice, every single character and plotline in this movie directly feeds into K's character development

>everything from Vegas onward ruined the film
Would you rather have the story end with K actually being the replicant child? I thought the revelation from the other replicants that he was not the one was very important, and it makes you empathize for the whole replicant race if they've lived through their own existential nightmares anything like K's. The scene with the giant Joi billboard was also very important to his character development. His interactions with Deckard weren't important in the end, but he thought they were at the time because he believed Deckard was his father.

The final act was critical for tying up K's arc. The replicant army wasn't a big plot point nor was it a plot hole, it was just another faction that became involved as the stakes grew. More world-building.

>Also what the hell happened to the dog.
the dog got up and trotted away

Everyone is a replicant

K's arc:
>You're not special at all, you're just a soulless object.
>Actually, you are extremely special.
>Never mind, wrong person, you're definitely not special.
>K: "Fuck you all, I can be special if I want to."

No he wasn't. Did YOU even watch? That was a red herring. He finds out that it was some girl and not him. It made him think he was special, but he wasn't. He realizes in the end he's just a none special replicant.

Was anyone in the movie human?

Joshi, Wallace, Coco and all the cops calling K a skinjob at the station were human. Maybe Deckard too.

Also Wallace's henchmen who K beat up / killed, all the orphans, and the scavengers who Luv blew up with missiles. Not sure about the orphanage keeper

More importantly, was it a real dog?

He's a wizard

Bautista. K just mistook him for a replicant due to his freakish strength.

Are replicants purely flesh and blood, or is there a mechanical element to them?

we don't know how they're made exactly but they're bio-engineered which implies genome alteration (so flesh and blood).

Why would a human have a replicant print on his eye, and look exactly like a line of mass produced replicant soldiers?

what was the purpose of that
>CELLS
>CELLS
>INTERLINKED
test?

no, the point was even if he was a replicant, does he not deliver to be seen of the same value as humans

Were the bees ever explained? I saw no plant life in the zone deckard was living in. Was it supposed to tie back in to the flower left on rachels grave?

As in bees pollinate flowers, dead replicant waifu was the flower deckard was the bee?

Replicants emotions are supressed. If they hesitate at all while being bombarded with questions, it means they had an emotional reaponse which in turn means they are not "baseline" and have become unreliable.

Are there mass produced replicants? It would make sense that there would be but have there been any shown in either movie?

thanks user

I figured it was implied by their usage of the word "a" before the name of the model in question. I dont think it was ever shown in any instance.

ask him.

>Joshi, Wallace, Coco and all the cops calling K a skinjob at the station were human

Proof?

Well... I would say that they're not completely suppressed, they're just kept within limits. Close to the "baseline" they keep talking about.

No, he was a human brainwashed to believe he was a Replicant

I mean humans can't run through concrete walls.

First movie:
Assume Deckard is a human, there is ambiguity, hes probably a replicant in the end

Sequel:
Assume K is a replicant, there is ambiguity, hes probably a replicant in the end

All things considered Im more confident K is a replicant than Deckard

>Was he a replicant?

no. he has memories. did you even watch the movie??

>The fucker walks through a wall ffs.

it was particleboard

you almost got me

voigt-kampff 2.0

not an argument

Did you just say Luv was a human you dumb fuck

HE WAS WAY OFF BASELINE

But they already know he's a replicant

It's now about making sure he remembers that.
Unlike the VK where the results were kept from the participant, here they're intentionally informed if they're constant or off as a warning. that the powers that be won't tolerate it. It's a different kind of psychological test.

This movie really isn't that deep but it might be a bit too intellectual for ya

did you notice the hanging food drips for the bees near the hive? I presume that's how they were making honey

Unlike you he can reproduce, so that makes him a RepliCAN