Blade runner 2049 is good

>blade runner 2049 is good

>Blade Runner 2049 was great

It's not just "good", it's very well made.

And it would not be so remarkable if it wasn't a sequel to an old cult movie.

it was barely decent

the opposite, really. Would have been a much greater self-contained sci-fi narrative if it didn't feel the need to extrude out of what was already a perfectly bounded story

it was boring

>another contrarian BR hate thread

What's a good sci fi movie then according to you niggers?

it was boring.

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever.

Yeah I agree, only a brainlet would call it just "good", the film is at the very least great, and that's also an understatement of it's quality.

lol I bet most of these guys couldn't even make a $100 million sci fi epic if they tried.

>blade runner 2049 isn't good

>only says what your mood

idiot. i was put in that mood by the boring movie.

It's abundantly clear it's a low quality movie user, you should look up the behind the scenes props and scale models for the original. Shit blows anything in 2049 out of the water. You can't follow up on the combined works of countless artists and sculptors with cgi.

Boring and fun are valid arguments. You just don't like them.

Yes, boring is not an argument. Boring is a description. It is a very accurate description of the film.

People didn't like Blade Runner when it came out.

Few can

>I know better than literally everyone else because I watched the first ten minutes of Solaris once
Only on Sup Forums dot org

Stop being a contrarian fuck just because of Sup Forums memes.

Most people find films by Tarkovsky "boring", probably because they are a bit slower than todays films. Are they bad films then?
Most people find flicks by Marvel "fun", probably because it's non stop braindead quips and mindless CGI action. Are they good films then?

Imagine being this ignorant and delusional.
BR2049 is almost entirely practical. Where models were used in the original, here it's actual real life sets. Everything you see in this pic is achieved completely in camera, not only the statues but the lighting also, it's not some heavy post production color grading.
Same goes for most of the scenes user, giant Joi literally being projected onto fog and rain, all the apartments, the entirety of Deckard casino

yes, marvel movies are good because they successfully achieve what they intended which is to entertain people. only literal autists are triggered by quips and hate them. only contrarians hate the action because they think it's cool to be edgy and to hate what's popular then they copy-paste parrot buzzwords.

yes, tarkovsky is bad because no one creates a film with the intention of making the audience fall asleep. "2deep4u" and "it's just slower" and other excuses are just lame excuses used by pretentious attention whores who want to yammer how they know something that other people do not get.

>Old bitch as we were walking out moaning about how the entire movie was shit and a waste of time, her husband just quietly nodding in agreement while probably fantasizing over JOI

Why do normies go to see this movie?

>yes, marvel movies are good because they successfully achieve what they intended which is to entertain people
Wow this is some prime bait, well done.
So every C tier brainless horror jumpscare flick #547 is also a good movie because it successfully makes the audience jolt a few times with sudden loud sounds? So every Transformers flick is also a good movie because the chinese are entertained by dumb americans and loud noises?
2001, Blade Runner, Stalker, Lawrence of Arabia, all those are all terrible films because most people would call it boring then?

Brainlet of the year, go be "entertained" by your degenerate brain deteriorating capeshit my dear amigo friend.

>yes, marvel movies are good
Blade Runner 2049 contrarians, everybody

>you are now aware that Sup Forums unironically got upset that a $150 million dollar sequel didn't do well at the box office
Can this board be saved?

Stick to video games and capeshit. Leave the discussion of art to people who aren’t too stupid to understand it.

the story was absolute trite bullshit

but it looked pretty and had a waifu so KINO

Explain why it was shit?

Blade Runner

>same underlying plot of "RISE UP against tyrannical government with a mystical child" that we've seen for decades
>Love can just break into police stations IN THE FUTURE WHERE CAMERAS SHOULD BE EVERYWHERE and murder whoever she likes.
>Ryan Gosling is an awful actor and he was given a role where he has to play a literal non-feeling clone/robot but we are supposed to feel for him? Why do I care about anyone in this movie?
>somehow the original blade runner still looks better
>Jared Leto existing
>Harrison Ford looking like he doesn't want to be alive anymore (not acting, legit he just hates making movies)
>not boring but scenes drag and atmosphere doesn't build in certain scenes (outside with the bees really sticks out)
>why am I supposed to have empathy for a waifu robot when she is just programmed to do whatever her master wants.

>reboot cash grab
>cgi shitfest
>include harrison ford who has bigger tits than any of the actresses in the movie
>made for manchildren similar to the star wars reboots
Sup Forums is dead

I came here to laugh at people who are so buttblastic about the film being above their perceptive capabilities that they have to make threads about how shit it is and how everyone who liked it is a brainlet.

Is it the right one?

It's a 9/10 movie with only 2 notable flaws

>the cycle continues

>same underlying plot of "RISE UP against tyrannical government with a mystical child" that we've seen for decades
That’s not the plot you mongoloid, the plot is K trying to find his own identity, he rejects the rebellion just as much as he rejects Wallace.

>Love can just break into police stations IN THE FUTURE WHERE CAMERAS SHOULD BE EVERYWHERE and murder whoever she likes.
Wallace is basically God on earth and it is implied how his power and influence is untouchable, especially by some local police officers.

>Ryan Gosling is an awful actor and he was given a role where he has to play a literal non-feeling clone/robot but we are supposed to feel for him? Why do I care about anyone in this movie?
Are you not feeling about Roy in the original? A replicant who think he's an actual born real human bean with a soul only to find out he's an average robot with zero identity is not something to care about? The furnace scene or the memory realisation scene were not emotionally investing for you? And you're lying if you say that you cared more about Deckard in the original than about K here.

>somehow the original blade runner still looks better
The new one is clearly not trying to "outdo" the original in terms of making the visuals more gritty or dense, the visuals just supports the bleak sterile narrative

>Jared Leto existing
His performance was okay, only his monologues were written a bit dodgy

>Harrison Ford looking like he doesn't want to be alive anymore (not acting, legit he just hates making movies)
I absolutely disagree, this is one of his best performances in decades. Hell, he shown more emotion and care about his character here than the original Blade Runner

.

>why am I supposed to have empathy for a waifu robot when she is just programmed to do whatever her master wants
Sure, she's programmed to call him Joe and say she loves him, but she also puts herself in harms way for him, shows distress when she realizes she's going to die, hires a hooker for him then tells her to fuck off when nobody else is around... none of that would have been explicitly programmed any more than we're genetically/sociologically programmed to react to queues, so does it matter at that point that she loved him in the first place because it was programmed?

Both of them were programmed/created—him to serve something, her to love—but at some point you're meant to accept their actions as having value in site of that

Like based denis?

Kek finally they have shown their true retarded colors.
That is if this isn't bait.

>2 flaws
Your mom.

I liked it.

>Unironically thinking 2001 was good
"No!"
The scenes are unnecessarily long and if it came out today it would be criticised for it, I dont care that it was the "first to do it", it did it wrong. It was so basic how he filmed the apes, I see more complex filmaking from a wildlife documentary.

>BUT DUDE LONG TAKES ARE FOR PATRICIANS
You can have long quiet scenes that are both good and bad. Just because its long doesnt automatically make it good fucking hell.

>DUDE THOSE SCENES MAKE US APPRECIATE TECHNOLOGY AND SHIT
a competent director would have directed those scenes in a way that doesn't put a hyperactive 5 year old to sleep. It's just shitty film making, no excuse.

>IT JUST DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH LASER GUNS AND SJW PANDERING FOR YOU LIKING
Fuck off. Before Sunrise was litterally just two people walking around a city, talking and it wasn't boring for a second. You know why? BECAUSE IT HAD A COMPETENT DIRECTOR!

>DUDE BUT THE AENDING WAS PRETTY LSD TRIPPIN LMAO
So it's confirmed the drugs have destroyed your brains. 2001 fans are literally DUDE WEED LMAO tier

>brainlet manchildren arrive just in time

t. extemely stale overused brainless pasta spamming turboautist

>Copypastas are invalid

unironically this

>b-but muh cinematographic experience !!

i don't watch movies to fall asleep

i'ts actually garbage. I didn't have any expectations when i went to see it, regardless of that fact, i left the cinema dissapointed.

>the world is bland
>tries to be good at everything and fails miserably
>aesthetically uninteresting, dull.
>abuses hight volume and ominous sounds to fill the aesthetic void

It just felt like a generic detective-thriller movie with unnecessary science fiction details.

>I'm trying to solve the mystery that makes me more than a mere artifact, btw im an alien cowboy, and im exploited workforce so im also a revolutionary subject.

This film is the perfect example of a bad built plot. It just fails at telling a story and at making a coherent world.

>aesthetically uninteresting, dull.
To everyone ITT this is what an actual 2/10 bait post looks like.

jesus, is this really what brainlets thought about the movie? no wonder it flopped

Please just wait for the next transformers.

it is aesthetically uninteresting, it's done nothing we haven't seen a thousand times before and executed better

>martian red radiation zone and sandstorms
literally sci-fi dystopias bread and butter landscape

>dark foggy city
never seen this before and with real props, people, signs and vehicles.

>final confrontation in a stormy ocean
drive all over again

>snowfall for the ending
total bullshit in that world where it'd never happen, total cliche.

...

>literally sci-fi dystopias bread and butter landscape

Name 3 other films where this happens.

Did you spend much time in the CIA? For you.

Have you ever been in an aircraft? For you.

Do they keep you in the flight plan? For you.