At this point, everyone on Sup Forums is a furry right?

At this point, everyone on Sup Forums is a furry right?
Everyone loves all the anthro movies and shows and shit. Why still pretend?

Maybe...

Sup Forums lost it's anti-furry credibility when it created /mlp/ and /vp/
mook might as well do the profitable thing and remake /fur/

That's what trash is for and it does its job well.

everyone always was a furry. It's just that for some time between the end of Tiny Toons and the advent of Zootopia you let some internet people convince you they weren't

Trash is great. Finally having clop threads back after the scruffening is great.

I don't care, I just find good art and fun shows and try not to be a pushy asshole about what I like.

>Zootopia
MLP, really

God, I'm glad that foolishness is done and over with.

maybe I'm a furry, but definitly not for illumination's cash-grab characters

>At this point, everyone on Sup Forums is a furry right?
Depends on your definition of "furry"
If you mean furry as having a fetish for anthropomorphic animals they yeah, a lot of us are furry.
If you mean that we are a part of that fandom nonsense then no.

In fact it might be better to say that we are toon fetishists since that fits most of us here especially the "I'm not a _____ but that [cartoon character] is hot as fuck!!!" people.

Funny thing, most of the horsefuckers converted into Zootopia fans.
One autism replaced another.

Makes prefect sense because the same thing happened to most AT fans here switching to SU and most FOP fans switching to Loud House.

what was before MLP/AT/FOP?

I.like.mlp.zootopia and SU.
Im.basically autism incarnate.
Though the best thing about mlp and zootopia are the porn

>what was before MLP/AT/FOP?
Hard to say. AT had help since a few of the creators actually went to this board but many probably came from Flapjack. FOP had a long standing fanbase here. MLP probably pulled in fans from Sonic and various SoL animes.

The is nothing wrong with anthro characters it's how you look at them is what matters. If you see a silly cartoon that's fine but if you see it as a something to fuck then shame on you and kindly yiff in hell.

>/vp/
/vp/ was a mistake nobody talks about the video games in there. I just want to talk about the video games.

Disney renaissance and a lot of '90 cartoons are full of anthro characters. It was and will be like this forever, then you're not a furry for these cartoons.

That is not sexy.

But this is

That's the joke.jpg

There's a big difference between "furry" and "will fuck anything".

At least you know she puts out...

movie was cute! :3

Everyone but me.

Being a furry was never the problem. Everyone has at least one anthro character they'd want to fuck to kingdom come ("Everyone's furry for Krystal" and Lola Bunny come to mind), and there's nothing wrong with it.

The problem was being a furry IN EXCESS, being the kind of weird creep who takes their fetish too far and turns it into an integral part of their personality. The people who feel it's vital to go out into public wearing cat ears and a tail, or the people who believe they're truly a fox-person in a human shell, or the people who live in fucking communes designed specifically for fat furry fucks to have disgusting sex with each other. These are the people that garnered the most hate, and it's still very acceptable to hate these people, but not because they like furry characters. It's okay to hate them because they are terrible, pathetic excuses for human beings, and their being furries is just a scruffy coat of paint on top of it all.

>There is nothing wrong with cartoon characters it's how you look at them is what matters. If you see a silly cartoon that's fine but if you see it as a something to fuck then shame on you
fixed because that's how most "normal" people see us here whether or not they are talking animals.

...

>At this point
>this point

>Liking a movie is the same as wanting to fuck the characters.

>Why still pretend?
Ye olde "yiff in hell furfag"-meme.

"Ye" was never part of old English, it was always "the".

The reason for this misconception is that they used a special character for the "th" sound which looks a bit like the character "y". Now stop perpetuating it.

No

This one?

You're free to make a fool of yourself. But secretly others will be laughing at you.

no one really cares desu

Thes

Speak for yourself.

authism

I'm not a furry. I don't even like kids shows or waifu shit. I'm just here for the occasional non-cape story time.

and I fucking hate your guts, yall give me douche chills when you spout "a-a-atleast im not alone right, guys?" this isn't your fucking clubhouse.

most of Sup Forums would feel more at home on Deviantart I'm sure, but still act all superior in comparison to them, they're exactly the same pathetic autists

well i dig Aldebaran and want to fuck Judy Hopps so you may not like me but i'm in your clubhouse

>Aldebaran

As a general rule, I assume everybody is sexually attracted to various cartoon anthropomorphic animals. And anybody who claims otherwise is lying.

The definition of "furry" is pretty vague already, and if you make it so broad as to include the above, then it essentially becomes meaningless.

This. I can't understand how people can shove something like that in other people's faces and feel like that's a normal thing to do.
Although the people who actually think they are animals are otherkin not furries, unless the definitions of those two got merged or something.

This site just has an arbitrary "no furry" rule because of outdated 2003 hate of anything that has fur on it.
Hiroshimoot doesn't even hate furries, but the other admins on the site irrationally hate furries because of the old "yiffe in hell xD" shit from back in the day.

Speaking of Sup Forums mods, where were they the other day with the post that had a dragon sucking itself off?

>Although the people who actually think they are animals are otherkin not furries, unless the definitions of those two got merged or something.
Well, a lot of otherkin ARE furries, so for a long time it was hard to differentiate between the two. Nevertheless, nowadays rational people understand the difference between otherkin and furries, and it helps that many furries are openly vocally against retarded otherkin faggotry.

SHE ISN'T PURE

Gumball isn't furry because almost all the entire cast are non animals like bananas, a balloon, a t-rex, a ghost, a robot, etc.

does anyone have a mega?

Nope, I still give known furries the evil eye when I pass 'em by amd a good look at my can of mace.

>Sup Forums lost it's anti-furry credibility when it created /mlp/ and /vp/
>/vp/

/vp/ is vehemently anti-furry due to the lack of moderation back in the old days, now the only way a furry thread can survive is by being covert and that only works if you avoid the local shitposter.

>/mlp/

You and I both know that it was created to counteract shitposting with it's porn being banned outside of /trash/.

/vp/ and /mlp/ are anti-furry because they know they're very similar to furries and want to avoid the label.

>/vp/ and /mlp/ are anti-furry because they know they're very similar to furries and want to avoid the label.

Then you clearly don't know the history of /vp/, does the name "Bui" ring any bells?

I'm not sure if I qualify because almost all of the anthro characters I beat off to are arthropods or reptiles, with an occasional bird. The only mammals I'm attracted to are actual humans, with very rare "monster" exceptions. Can you be a furry if you don't dig fur?

>does the name "Bui" ring any bells
Don't you dare fucking summon that evil here

Yep, furry is only a term that includes all anthro animals.

>reptiles
Scalie?

Well that's what you get for blocking out the past.

>a good look at my can of mace
Why? You eager to use it or something? If so you really shouldn't be trusted with it.

No, it's just a reminder to them that they have to control themselves in public.

Very true. The internet is infected with Zootopia porn like it's malware or pop up ads.

> I can't be a furry if it doesn't have fur!

What utter nonsense. Everyone's so terrified of being accused of being a FURRY that they'll tie themselves in knots coming up with justifications as to why they're not a Furry.

It's considered perfectly acceptable around here to pop a boner to sexy cartoon vegetables, minerals, household appliances, planes, trains and automobiles, but if it's an animal? Woah, that's too far, man!

Anthropomorphic animals, even sexy ones, are mainstream, casual and normie as shit. Everyone in the world likes cartoon animals. But not everyone in the world is a hardcore FAN of cartoon animals.

Do you consider yourself a Furry? No? Then you're not a Furry. Simples.

>sexy cartoon vegetables
Would love some examples

I will jack off to everything on /trash/, but it doesn't mean that I want to see it all the damn time.

It's only partially cartoon, but

We need more defined rules to consider what is acceptable furry and what isn't, especially because the medium is filled with anthropomorphic animals.

YES IT IS THE SAME THING!

denialfag

I'm not a furryafter my first year here I realized I was gay I don't know if there's any correlation or not.

No, because what I masturbate to isn't who I am as a person and I have an identity separate from my interests.

What boards did you use?

this and Sup Forums

Nah, I just fap to Cuisin's gender swaped Sonic, but just because she is too much of a slut.