Films that liberals will never understand

Films that liberals will never understand.

this is the only actual film women will never understand

Master and Commander

Thats it!

>women
>understanding anything

Is there a movie about gender? If there is, that.

The entire trilogy.

...

anything made before Star Wars came out

Wouldn't liberals easily understand movies about being greedy, shifting loyalties and backstabbing?

No because the protagonist is white

...

they wouldn't understand why the shiftless, backstabbing, cowardly mexican isn't the main character.

But the point of the movie is that Tuco and Joe actually like each other.
You can see this especially at the ending duel, both Tuco and Joe target both Sentenza, Joe had unload Tucos gun but he couldn't know this, but he still target Sentenza because he don't want to actually kill Joe which he still consider his friend.

>Joe

I fucking hate amerilards for completely misusing the term liberalism and by extension, liberal.

Pretty much anything with Eastwood in, from Dirty Harry to Gran Torino.

>women understanding any Leone film
>or any Scorsese film for that matter

Beat me to it.

Charlie Bronson, too

I totally understand this film, go fuck yourself dumb ass

Dwuuuhhhhhhhhh everyding is liberwal vs conserwadiv!!!! I'm 16 year an brows Sup Forums ewery day!!! buuhhhhhhhh

That's his name in the first two Dollar films, I hate the name "Blondie".

>images[2].png

My mother loves the Scorese films

>I totally got this film
>Doesn't explain what he got
Truth is the bane of the nu-male.

i don't remember him having a name in the first two dollar films

>grugglllrrrr im a radikal sentrist guhhhhdhrrkghklll

there are love stories for women in other Leone flicks

same user

...

t. bugman

don't bother. when i told Sup Forums my mum loved master and commander they tried to convince me she was a trap.

...

This

At least in the German version he was called "Joe".

I also saw them in English, but I saw the first 2 Dollar films probably 15 times so I don't remember if he had a name in the English version, but I know he was called Joe in the German one.

...

he's never called Joe in the English version, your German dub probably called him Joe because they wouldn't want people to think people called him Blondie because he's part of the arian master race that Germany has forcibly dissociated itself from after WW2

Bane?

...

Holy fuck, you didn't get them at all if you truly believe they were "love stories for women". And you're a dumbfuck if you truly believe romantic plots are always made for women.

your german dubbing fucked up hard, he's the man with no name

Eh, no, he also was called Blondie in the case of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly, but he was called Joe in the German dub for Fistful of Dollars and A few Dollars more.

why can't liberals into love, empathy and honor? Were they born retarded or did the media make them that way?

take your meds

I respect liberals more than centrists. They are completely brainwashed but at least they usually have the courage to fight for what they've been tricked into believing to be right. Centrists are just cowards, and usually virgins too

Tell that the dozens of Django movies we have in Germany that doesn't even have the name Django in it in the original version... Joe was at least somewhat understandable because Joe is just a random name someone can take to hide his identity, so similar to "Man with no Name".

It's annoying as fuck. Im not even sure how it happened. Logically it doesn't even make sense.

Sorcerer 1977

years of drinking J*wish koolaid/semen made them hate themselves, which they project toward the rest of the world

I'm a liberal and I love every film posted so far ITT
except BvS

he was never called Joe in the English version and iirc Angel Eyes was never called Sentenza. it's weird the German version gave them names.

but do you understand them?

How do you go from free market economics to, whatever the fuck americans seem to be using as a definition for liberalism.

>love
good job proving the thread's point tard, you can't even understand a single sentence let alone films

in the french version, angel eyes is Sentenza also, but Blondie is Blondin (a common nickname for blonde people). I think it's good since this guy is more or less supposed to be nameless

...

Liberals, that's how.

>liberal
>can’t understand batkino vs superkino
like pottery

>German versions
In the German versions of King Kong, Kong is call Frankenstein.

snyder sucks

No, I know plenty of women who love that shite

They called them Sentenza because "Engelsauge" would be a more weird name than "Blondie" in the German language.

Whoever wrote this has absolutely no idea what they're talking about

unironically, because of
>american education

But there are no Middle-Eastern enemies in the entire movie. There’s an African warlord, Lex and Russian mercenaries. Did the reviewer even watch the damn movie?

Doesn't he rape two women in High plains Drifter and basically walk all over a town of spineless cockfags?

Like I said, in case of TGTBATU he's also called Blondie in Germany, I just didn't like the name Blondie and falsely assumed he Eastwoods character was also named "Joe" in the English version instead of giving him no name.

This attitude is why the 2-party system is perpetually fucked.

t. brainlet
BvS was pure unfiltered kino.

i'm a liberal and i enjoyed this film

>Enjoying something is the same as understanding it

That film is racist.

okay nerd
i'm a liberal and i understood this film AND i enjoyed it

ITT Idiots who don't know about the feminist ideals that were put into the spaghetti westerns by Leone
Do you guys all just roleplay at understanding movies?

His name was Manco in FaFDM, you philistine.

I am a Social Democrat and i enjoyed it (mining districts north sweden).

is it really cold where you live

I don't believe it until you explain it

Monco*
You're right, but I always have the name "Joe" from the first Dollar movie in my head.

Same way as femism is now marxism apparently. Americans just have a thing for completely butchering the original meaning of a word/concept

I'm a socialist and I enjoyed Der Ewige Jude.

it's an aggressively revisionist take on the western genre: despite the supposed claims of the title, none of the main characters have personalities that can be fit into society's moral framework. instead, each of the characters operate on a highly individualist moral code that comes to the fore in their chase for the maguffin of the gold. it's a film about essence and about one's true character when faced with a prospect as tantalising as 'gold': none of the characters are 'honourable' or particularly pander to the audience's sensibilities, they simply operate according to their own laws

...

I just looked at the IMDB page, still don't know if the US version had a Joe in the first Dollar movie, but the original version had it definitely:
"The Man With No Name is actually called Joe in the film's dialog (by the undertaker) and in the closing credits. "

He's called Joe by the coffin maker in Fistful of Dollars.

Anyway, Sergio Leone himself doesn't believe Clint Eastwood plays the same character. The idea to sell it as trilogy came out much later in US.

>I'm a socialist
Oh cool, please give me some of your money then

...

And to be clear, I'm talking about the English version of Fistful of Dollars. In For a Few Dollars More he's called Manco. And in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, they just call him Blondie.

But why does he wear the exact same outfit? Without the background that this is one character the whole Soldier dying scene in TGTBATU would make no sense because there would be zero emotional involving that he took the Poncho. It's like Bruce Wayne finally get in his Bat suit.

...

...

more like films which conservatives will never understand
it's about the lack of control involved being in a soldier despite society, family, and friends telling you to the contrary. americunts just think it's a film about shooting ay-rabs

I always thought that the Dollars Trilogy is like reverse Hammer Horror series. Hammer didn't give a fuck about continuity, and yet pretend otherwise. Leone didn't plan to make an actual trilogy, but (kinda) did.

And to be honest, casting Lee Van Cleef twice to play a totally different character is much more puzzling than a poncho.

Never seen a woman "enjoy" Master and Commander.

Your shitty fantasy movie is great for women, deal with it.

The National Socialists also loved it.

...

Master and Commander is unironically one of my mum's favourite films, and i'm pretty sure she's a woman

But at least Van Cleef looks totally diferrent as Sentenza than as Colonel Mortimer, even his hair was more grey than white, but Eastwood looks like the exact same character and behaves like the exact same character in all three movies, there is no single difference between his three characters, not even in nuances.

is that any good?