Future London

>future London
>there's white people

Really made me think..

>fantasy

wtf is wrong with their eyes?!

>future London
Actually that scene happened on September 1st 2017.

HP is set in the ninties, that's probably around the current year

What do you call that skin tone?

shot on shigital

>majority ginger
ginger uprising soon?

Was Hogwarts practice for an ethno state?

Harry was born in 1980. This scene takes place in 1st of September 2017. So it's not future.

can't really stretch their skin or sink their cheeks so you give em baggy eyes

meanwhile the real state of LONDON

>that's probably around the current year

so where is the diversity?

Honestly some characters that look different from the five hundred carbon-copy gingers and ELLO GOVNAH pale ghosts might have gone a long way to add just a small, merciful amount of spice to one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Not bad.

god’s work

How come harry's kids didnt come out ginger while ron and hermoines did?

...

10/10

That's really misleading. White people could be naming their kids Mohammed as well.

god tier bait

>Irish descended scum
>white

>White people could be naming their kids Mohammed as well.
t. corbynista

thats nothing
go to toronto or vancouver and you'll think you're not even in canada anymore

>(and there are even a few Corbyns!)
OOOOHHH