Get a chance to make a great sequel to one of the most iconic science-fiction films...

>get a chance to make a great sequel to one of the most iconic science-fiction films, end up making just another soulless cash-grab

Why is Villeneuve such a hack?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LkvZKpmrOno
youtube.com/watch?v=NujlXgBmUoU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

DO YOU HAVE ANY CHEESE?

>get a chance to make a great sequel to one of the most iconic science-fiction films
> end up making a film better than the original

How the fuck did he do it.

>an almost 3 hour long R rated visually focused slow burning neo-noir sci fi film with zero quips that deals with the human condition
>"cash-grab"
sure thing buddy

Treasure Island is a great book, you should read it

You read?

kys plebs

the only aspect in which 2049 isn't better than the original is the soundtrack. Zombie Zimmer doesn't have shit on Vangelis
youtube.com/watch?v=LkvZKpmrOno

wow what an eloquent highly insightful reply, you must be a highly intellectual individual no doubt

>bombing massively at the box office, the same as the original Blade Runner
>"cash grab"

But its kino
Reddit tourists said so

>Is retarded enough to like 2049
>Expects a eloquent highly insightful reply

>cash-grab
>Sequel to a flop
>Do literally nothing to make it more approachable than the original
>Make trailers as vague as possible

AN eloquent highly insightful reply*
Basic english my man.

not him, but work on your shitposting, kid. you're never gonna gather large amounts of (You)'s with this lazy technique. simply calling things shit doesn't work anymore

>>Is retarded enough to like 2049
>>Expects an eloquent highly insightful reply

>Hans Zimmer
why. Katy Perry would have done a better fucking job

Bait

it's quite a bit more approachable than the original which in fairness is partly due to being a sequel, but also it wasn't 3 different films that later got conflated into one cut liek with the original either.

The problem with dystopian fiction is that it tends to be one-sided. Good for Villeneuve because he barely manages more than one tone per film.

It also has a bad track record of actually becoming true.

To label this film science-fiction in 2017 is either offensive or ignorant. Why the hell would someone create androids when we already have evidence that the human body is not the most efficient for labor? And why wouldn’t they just have a killswitch?

Blade Runner 2049 is really just a continuation of ideas people had half a century ago. It’s even worse than the usual 80s nostalgia because this demonstrates a complete dismissal of current progress and is ignorant to more likely predictions.

We‘re either heading towards a positive future with technological progress where humans are subservient to our AI overlords or we become part of a hivemind utopia.
Or something terrible happens and we have something apocalyptic like The Walking Dead.

Blade Runner 2049 has the audacity to project a future with human AI, flying cars and fancy gadgets but earth pretty much in ruins. Human AI that never transcends human intelligence? We’ve already seen that’s unlikely (Chess, Go, Dota, self-driving cars etc). And does anyone seriously believe we‘re getting flying cars before solving the energy and climate crisis? Lmao.

This movie is another example of unimaginative fantasy masquerading as sci-fi. It requires tremendous suspension of disbelief in order to convey themes for almost three hours that have been covered much better in a short story 50 years ago. Embarrassing.

There was some alright tunes but I really hated how soulless it felt sometimes, mostly had no tunes but just le epic ambience with some good stuff in between.
At least it was loud as tits so stuff like youtube.com/watch?v=NujlXgBmUoU made the entire fucking theater rumble and vibrate.

I love how the only criticsm of BR2049 is either the 3 or 4 overused buzzword-filled stale pastas or brainless "it's shit kys" statements.

>when we already have evidence that the human body is not the most efficient for labor
Did you miss the part about how replicants are super strong and agile"
did you miss Goose breaking that hobos spine like it aint no thang?
did you miss goose run through a concrete wall like it wasnt even there?

Did you miss the part where you are arguing with a (You) grabbing mindless pasta?

Funny how br2049 babies can't refute this but will prattle on about how wrong it is because it doesn't just say it's kino

>To label this film science-fiction in 2017 is either offensive or ignorant.
1. sci fi does not have to be probable
2. it's a sequel to a film from 1982, set within the same universe

>The problem with dystopian fiction is that it tends to be one-sided
But Villeneuve shows both sides of every scenario, like in every Villeneuve film
>To label this film science-fiction in 2017 is either offensive or ignorant.
So you think even the original Blade Runner is not science-fiction?
>Why the hell would someone create androids when we already have evidence that the human body is not the most efficient for labor?
Again, you are arguing with the original here. And they are not used just for "labor", they have to function like human beings in order to be able to complete the tasks they have
>Blade Runner 2049 is really just a continuation of ideas people had half a century ago.
Yes, what's wrong with that?
>It’s even worse than the usual 80s nostalgia because this demonstrates a complete dismissal of current progress and is ignorant to more likely predictions.
You're a braindead moron. BR2049 isn't trying to show how will our world look in 2049, it shows how the world of Blade Runner would progress (or fall) in all those years.
>Human AI that never transcends human intelligence?
But they did? And no one said or implied "never"
>And does anyone seriously believe we‘re getting flying cars before solving the energy and climate crisis? Lmao
Again a retarded moronic statement, this film isn't showing our world but the BR world. They did solve the energy and the climate crisis, but if you payed any attention you would have known that there was a complete technological blackout and the fall of the entire ecosystem in the 2020's (as shown in the opening shot with a gigantic field of not working solar farms)

Brainless pasta spewing tourist crossposter

>all that text with nothing said
Why are the children of 2049 so low cinema iq? Even his little quip at the end is something he's been accused of and is now trying to use against others
Jesus christ

I was never accused of using brainless pastas or pastas in general, I wold never fall down to that degenerate level.
Also nice non argument my dear friend