Best portrayal of robot AI in film

>unique design
>has personality and sense of humor
>doesn't pretend to be human
>other humans don't treat it as a human
>ultimately purely rational and dedicated to the mission

>doesn't warn the humans about the water planet
>never uses math to help out beyond approximating how long the engines will take to dry out

TARS, set memes to 100%

Probably didn't have the data to warn the humans

T-1000 will always be the best

>a design that gives it no advantages over a bipedal robot
>except it takes up more space
BRAVO

>Moon
>it really helps

>it also rapes boys

who doesnt nowadays?

>hey guys 1 hour = 7 years and the ship has been down there for "10 years"

>implying walking server rack wasnt a goat-tier design

??? bipedalism is inefficient robot design

its a superb design. just hard to implement

So our bodies haven't evolved to be at their most effecient given our intelligence? Use your fucking brain

Je suis Kevin

TARS, set gf to 0 and put the MeMe System into overdrive

judging from the design it's probably got a few advantages

That death windmill formation would be terrifying on a battle field.
They said he was some kind of surplus combat robot.

>i have no idea how evolution works

Says it all about Interstellar that this was the most interesting character.

why don't you study some fucking mechanics of motion and physics before you run your fucking mouth at me, whore

no it isnt

yea it is

Well Weinstein likes them female but not that young. Spacey likes them young but male.

what about McConnoughy, he like them young and female. When is his time

he is too good in bad. No one complained

Well you're the one discounting millions of years of biological history. Your call sweetie.
Not an argument.

>durrrrr evolution is a forward moving process

>TARS, set memes to 100$

What else is it then?

what else would you expect from the government contracting process

oh wow did you learn about evolution from playing pokemon?

You forgot his best quality
>is a Marine

Not him, but it is exactly a forward moving process. It moves in the direction of fitness. That isn't the same as "every animal is aiming at being human", but there is a fucking reason why bipedalism is useful and we have it.
>can reach things
>can climb shit
>can run pretty fast
>walking uses less energy

You're acting like the perfect most efficient design is the head of a human, the body of a lion, eyes of an eagle, arms of an octopus etc.

Plus, why the fuck wouldn't a robot designed to be around humans emulate our bodies?
>makes it easier to talk to and understand
>can go where we go, meaning it can drive cars, operate machinery, climb, sit etc
>if it has machine learning AI then it will seem more human because how we interact with the world shapes our perception. The world is a place to act, and being shaped like a human compels you to act in certain ways.

Bipedal robots are inefficient specific robot design. If you have a robot that all it does is cut holes in pastry, you don't need to give it legs. Autonomous cars don't have legs.

Nobody's perfect

>Autonomous cars don't have legs.

not yet

>unique design

What is my purpose ?

It moves in the direction of extinction, ultimately.

Most evolutionary paths lead themselves to dead ends, hence why most species that existed went extinct and why this doesn't relate to how complex a specie is. Lots of creatures are basically the same as other ones that roamed the earth several magnitudes of time longer than humans did, while lots of evolutionary branches that spawn in the interim have gone out into oblivion.

Evolution isn't an optimal process: natural selection isn't a forward thinker and traits that are useful today may be detrimental tomorrow, most mutations are harmful and even when mutations are useful they aren't produced in response to environmental needs they are random.

As for the robot thing, there's no need why those machines couln't operate themselves or why the robot couldn't operate them from a distance. Why would you design a car seat for a robot when you can just have the car drive itself or, if somehow the company of this robot is so nice, have the robot upload it's virtual brain to the car and leave it's other body behind or packed neatly into a small trunk.

Human design is efficient for our weight. It doesn’t scale at different weights. It’s not the best micro design, it’s not the best giant design, but it is the most efficient energy use for our particular size, but these things do not directly scale as you get larger or smaller. Soon as you reach a new level either bigger or smaller, the whole game changes and suddenly it’s not longer efficient, which is why nothing super heavy nor anything super small has our design, only things similar to our size have something even close to our design.

For most of that comment, so?
Very few traits, especially physiologically, are obsolete. Many species are very well adapted to their environments. Now, perhaps they aren't optimum, maybe six fingers is a better hand in general, but if you did that, then you'd need to make new gloves, new keyboards etc. Which is why people are designing bipedal robots.

Most machines are better when specialised, but it doesn't mean that there aren't valid reasons for having a humanoid robot for general uses. Basically, every job that a human does that involves the body. There are cases when a human can't or shouldn't do those jobs.
Take firefighting. A human can easily navigate a home and rescue a person. There are unpredictable elements in a home though. Mess and clutter, weird furniture, doors. If a home is designed for a person, then a robot should fit that environment if it is operating in that space and tackle novel problems.
Maybe you have a situation where the robot needs to go into an area that doesn't have the latest technology and perform some function. What if it needs to use guns or an axe to chop wood, or use an old car or drive an old tractor.

It's a useful option.