Why didnt dumbledurr use the food summoning spell to cure world hunger?

Why didnt dumbledurr use the food summoning spell to cure world hunger?

first syllabe of his surename is kinda self-explanatory

It wasn't a spell, the food was actually made in the hogwarts kitchen, the spell was just to teleport it there

Why didnt dumbledurr use the hogwarts kitchen spell to cure world hunger?

It wasn't a spell, slave goblins or some shit worked on the kitchens

Why didn't Dumbledore just use the apparate spell to escape one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchise? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Would you actually accept food from a bent(gay homosex) sissy poz in one of the dullest franchises in history? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>Why didnt dumbledurr use the hogwarts kitchen spell to cure world hunger?

It's not a spell, it's slave labor.

...

Why was Dumbledore so bias towards Gryffindor?
Why didn't Harry use the time turner to go back in time and stop his parents getting killed?
Why was everyone in Slytherin a moustache-twirling villain? So are a quarter of wizards and witches evil by default?
Are the kids at Hogwarts taught Maths and English at any point in life?
Why were the rules of quidditch so retarded?
Who thought dementors were a good idea?
Why was everything about Voldemort stupid?

This one was better.

Because anglo food is disgusting.

why didnt he teleport food to africa?

>Are the kids at Hogwarts taught Maths and English at any point in life?

You kind of have to assume that both just comes naturally to them as they're never actually trained in either.

>Why was Dumbledore so bias towards Gryffindor?
Because Dumbledore was a bad principal. All he really cared about was grooming Harry to fight Voldemort
>Why didn't Harry use the time turner to go back in time and stop his parents getting killed?
He likes being a tragic hero
>Why was everyone in Slytherin a moustache-twirling villain? So are a quarter of wizards and witches evil by default?
Yes.
>Are the kids at Hogwarts taught Maths and English at any point in life?
No. (((Gringotts))) wants to keep wizards ignorant of things like finance
>Why were the rules of quidditch so retarded?
It's a parody of cricket, baseball, American "foot"ball
>Who thought dementors were a good idea?
The same sort of retards who cheer police brutality today
>Why was everything about Voldemort stupid?
He is a character in a series of children's books

Why did Dumbledore teleport cancer from the world?

for the same reason republicans dont want to feed the poor or give them healthcare. socialism is evil and ((capitalism)) is noble

>Why was everyone in Slytherin a moustache-twirling villain? So are a quarter of wizards and witches evil by default?

But the bravest man alive was a slythering

It's clearly nigger food on the table

>Why was everything about Voldemort stupid?

Voldemort was very well-done actually. Literally one of the most iconic villains of all time. What exactly do you think was stupid about?

because wizards don't give two fucks about niggers in poverty

food can't be created only enlarged or multiplied, gamps law

> Literally one of the most iconic villains of all time

Why didnt dumbledurr use the hogwarts kitchen slave labor to cure world hunger?

>villain

>Create a pile of rocks
>Transfigure it into apples
gamp btfo

pretty sure all of Hogwarts is an illusion for kids.

If they can be mutliplied can they be reverse-multiplied? Why didnt he reverse-multiply over populated countries?

yeah they transfigure stuff into animals all the time so clearly thats not an issue

>eat them
>turn back to rocks in your stomach

Is that canon?

...