I want people to realize how important life is so I'll spend hundreds of thousands to torture and kill random people lol

>I want people to realize how important life is so I'll spend hundreds of thousands to torture and kill random people lol

What are you trying to critize or say?

>this crazy guy that tortures random people, i don't think his reasoning is sound

>Hello, John. I want to play a game. For years you have been littering the streets of the city, throwing your trash around haphazardly and ignoring garbage bins. Tonight, you will learn that a man's small actions can have huge consequences. These four garbage compacters fastened to your limbs will slowly crush them one by one in slow torturous agony, unless you can locate the key hidden in this heap of dangerous medical waste.

>Tonight you will know what countless municipal sanitation workers felt like when they picked up your own litter. Let the game begin.

He spent thousands...

>bursts through door
>kills you

To kill singles

I mean, sure it's flawed logic, but as far as reoccurring horror antagonists go, he's probably one of the more interesting ones
Especially seeing as he's not: supernatural, voiceless or just kills for fun or food or something

How would you fix his character?

Make every Saw movie after the first one not retarded.

By bringing him back to life and rebooting Saw.

>inb4 it turns out he faked his death

Nothing triggered me more than that scene where the bitch puts 1 hand into a one way trap and then suddenly puts her other hand in another trap instead of just using her free hand to release her trapped hand

Stop trying to pretend these movies are anything but torture porn and remove all but the most basic framework from the story.

If you mean the one in II she had just knocked over the syringe with the antidote so it makes a little more sense that she would be in a frantic rush and not really think it through.

The second was fine, though

If he had so much money for traps why didn't he buy his cancer away???

Why didn't he just shoot the people? Same result and less expensive.

Because he never had a cancer, it was just his way out.

He wanted to simulate terminal illness like he went through. To appreciate life you have to come close to death, but of course a lot of those people don't survive.

Couldn't he I don't know, make a VR game about cancer or something?

>i only kill people who deserve it
>except the kind male nurse from the very first movie lol

He was capable of so much more, he just wanted to encourage him to go to medical school.

oh yeah!

I'd watch this.

He didn't kill him anyway, that one guy who didn't cut his leg off did

>put two people in a situation against their will where one of them is forced to murder the other to escape
>the guy who put them in this situation isn't complicit in the murder

I feel like SAW 6 explained this considering the heavy focus on insurance people.