Legit reviewer btw
Arnie Hammer is green lantern
Legit reviewer btw
Arnie Hammer is green lantern
Other urls found in this thread:
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
Damn that literal who shill is salty
>The CGI is awful
Well he is right
Yeah. Even if you hate Snyder's guts, that bit... no sane person can say shit like that seriously.
>PinkWhitenights
That's you OP, we all know it.
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
>this slays the Snydercucks
It's okay DC Universal already abandoned Dark Universe so you won't be the first ones to admit your "cinematic universe" is a failure just announce you're scrapping it already
His point about the CGI is right though
It looks fucking hideous, even more so than Thor, and that movie looked like legitimate shit
>Whedon
>expert craftsmanship
>(((whedon))) tried his hardest to (((sort))) it out
Anyone expected this to be anything else than trainwreck? seriously. Not hating DC or fans but 2 different directors and jarring styles, introducing few more heroes and a new villain in 2 hours? This couldn't be "general audience friendly" and only die-hard fans gonna trully enjoy it.
but the cgi looks great from the trailers?!?!
>but 2 different directors and jarring styles, introducing few more heroes and a new villain in 2 hours?
Literally the same as Avengers Infinity War
This is much worse than Joe Sweden
fuck warner
Who’s he shilling for again?
So basicslly like the avengers movies, always knew it was going to be marvel shit
>generic alien army that poses zero real threat
>tesseract like motherbox mcguffin
>blue beam portal nonsense
>bad guy is just a henchmen to an even bigger bad guy
>quips
>MCUck damage controlling this hard
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA FUCKING KINO
You're right, congrats on your second ever good movie
BOOOOOO
(You) are shilling for Disney, mr Pink Nights,aka self entitled legit reviewer
That literally reads like a shitpost...the absolute state of online reviewers.
No idea, stopped following MCU at Civil War, garbage-tier airport fight was enough. Age of Ultron was last one I seen in theater. Waste of money - all the same shit over and over.
*cackles*
>5 stars for under the skin
looks like hes our guy
...
>2 stars on GotG2
Oh, so his reviews literally don't matter
JL is still a masterpiece
Move on folks, we've been had by a fucking con artist, disregard everything
>pinkwhiteknights
Fucking kek. Clearly too much toxic masculinity for them. Probably too cerebral too.
...
the absolute state of this guy's taste
I don't even know if this post is for real or which side you're on. The shitpost has become too complex for me.
lmoa
>whedon
>expert craftsmanship
lol fucking hell what a clown
What's the problem?
This shit was called the second Whedon was announced.
"It's Snyder's fault, Whedon tried to save it."
Also, isn't Whedon a Weinstein-type? Or did we forget about that already?
>It wasn't sexual harassment....Whedon was just being a chad....
dude wheres the john wicks and flavor of the week horror movies!
Even if I agreed with you, that still puts them even with Disney in a quarter a number of their catalog of films. And still one Oscar ahead.
If he gave Guardians 2 a rating of 2 fucking stars it's clear the lunatic has absolute shit taste and is probably a contrarian faggot
By those assumptions it should be clear that he only shit on JL because he wants to stand out from the rest
>Whedon
>expert craftsmanship
Marvel may have been first to the cinematic universe, but DC beat them to the first cinematic universe reboot!
>Snyder gets the blame
>Whedon gets the praise
Universal was 1st here. Way too long time gap for pleb to remember 1940s.
>2 stars on Gotg2
Fuck him
>Arnie Hammer
>From Batman in George Miller's JL to Green Lantern on Cuck's JL
wew
>Armie Hammer is green lantern
Any proof or cam shots?
>Grown men who take this shit serious without realising these movies are made for children
its whedon's fault there is toneal mess
snyders version was dark and then whedon came in to happy everything up which of course isnt going to mix well in the final cut of the movie
>mousecucks so shook they screenshot literal who fake accounts
feels good to be a DChad
MoS and BvS are definitely not for children.
>
Guardians of the Galaxy 2 is shit. Watch it again when you are older. The humor was cringey, the supposedly dramatic parts where laughable, and the cgi was too much. The first one is a lot better, at least the humor was more subtle, not just slapstick and shitty highschool jokes which they then explain. Two stars is actually well deserved, it was on par with the shit that's Suicide Squad. The only difference is that people are like sheep. It's hip to love Marvel and hate DC. Both are equally shit.
GotG2 was a fun movie, though.
Only children could watch those movies and think they're anything but trash.
>inherent vice
>fire walks with me
Sounds pretty based to me
I see you enjoyed MoS and BvS
>1 star for mother!
pleb
>Legit reviewer btw
>some literal who on letterboxd because all real critics are saying the movie is solid
Wonder Woman all over again, will MCUcks ever recover from 2017 bros?
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
...
those are all great movies you dumbass
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
AND SOME DISNEY SHILL THOUGHT HE COULD DAMAGE CONTROL BY POSTING THIS HERE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
...
>>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
Based SoyBoy poster
Whedon is a fucking hack.
Hell I knew that back in high school when I used to watch Buffy.
The only reason that show was so popular was because everyone wanted to eat SMG's ass on a silver platter.
After Wonder Woman cucking Civil War in the United States? Don't think so, sweetie
>putting shills in their place
Based numaleposter, doing God's work
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
We all knew it was going to be shit.
It's been obvious for a very long time.
The only reason Buffy was popular was the female audience. No one with a brain cared about that shit.
Pretty impressed actually. He even gave a reasonable score to Florida Project, which was a critical darling, but considered overrated by audiences. Probably safe to assume he has good taste and isn't just pretentious or persuaded by hype.
Oh NO NO NO...
>ElfmanMVP
>hears some of the Batman '89 theme
>hears a bit of the William's Superman theme
>nostalgia overload
OMG AMAZING 5/5 10/10 100% BEST DC MOVIE BEST SUPERHERO MOVIE OF THE YEAR WILL SEE IT MULTIPLE TIMES
The mouse literally won't let anyone else get ahead.
and their drones are taking the bait wholesale.
>Lol dc is trying so hard to be serious it's just pretentious! Why are they afraid of fun!!!
>Lol the movie is fun but it's not good anyway though.
Lmao. Fucking americucks and their brand loyalty. They literally revel in being a profit margin.
>letterboxd
HAHAHAHAH
Holy fuck MCU shills are more entertaining than the movies they shill
>being a whedondrone soyboy, probably male feminist raping
>2017
>letterbox
>PinkWhiteNights
>expert crafstmanship
Yeah no his opinion is garbage
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
>snyder leaves 2/3 of the way through
>replace him with the absolute polar opposite of snyder
>where did this tonal inconsistency come from?
>1 minute ruins an entire movie
Pleb
Meanwhile
Not for me friend, but i'm 26, maybe i'm just too old.
wow, i kind of want to watch it now.
Nah. Whedon's schtick was new the. You didn't already know a main character would be killed off just because, and the humour hadn't been overdone, and was more fitting.
t. just started getting into "serious films"
>capeshit shouldn't be funny
>wellthat'sjustlikeyouropinionman.dud
>capeshit shouldn't be funny
Where the fuck did I imply that? I was presenting a shitty review to show that modern critics don't know what the fuck they're talking about. The critic viewed the film and saw no intensity or real stakes, yet because he thought it was funny, he gave it 4/5 stars. Meanwhile, if that shit got pulled in the DCEU, i.e Justice League or SS, it would get fucking slammed by reviewers simply because its not owned by Disney or is against the majority/normal fag opinion.
>Whedon tried his hardest to sort this tonal mess out, but even his expert crafstmanship could not do that
>bad cgi for lanterns
they had to delay their entire cinematic universe because of shitty cgi causing the last green lantern to fail, how did they not learn?
>He says as he defends Justice League getting rated poorly
Wait for the real review.
>Whedon
>expert craftsmanship
sorry mouse cuck that you'll never join us in the sun.
Oh this is great
DC fans will blame Whedon, Marvelets will blame Synder
There is no way this movie is getting anything over 20 percent
lol is this your new defense mechanism now that even if JL is the epitome of mediocrity that it'll perform better than Bore 3 Ragnacuck?
I dont get this image...Thor ragnarok is a in complete movie or what?