Explain this bullshit

Explain this bullshit.

The better movie has the better score. I don't know what else needs to be explained

good movies get good scores and shit movies get shit scores

BvS sucked, Logan didn't. You'll probably ignore that and call anyone who mentions that fact a shill

Logan was actually solid. BVS was bad.

Bad film gets bad score and a good film got a good score.

>27%
Indeed, that score is too high

You can't blame Disney this time

BvS is bad

Logan was pretty good

it means batman vs superman was a bad movie, logan was a good movie.
>also wasted trips.

B-but the Ultimate Edition is R-rated too.

I HURT

But Rogue One has a good score

>OOOOH BvS only got a low score cause of the mouse.

If anything Logan should be in the same position they are in, if the mouse paid it off, because they want the Fox marvel movies to fail for the rights back.

how does that disprove my point?

>Logan didn't have anything as bad as Eisenberg Lex
>action wasn't crap
>wasn't trying to promote several future movies with e-mail videos
>no MARTHA
>no Amy Adams Lois
>no Cavill Superman
>no ghost Pa Kent talking about horses
>Patrick Stewart swearing and having one of the cruelest cry ball death sequences ever
>Laura ripping dudes to pieces and being a spanish-spewing spazz

Oh wow. I wonder why it got better reviews.

Just being rated R doesn't automatically make a film better.

>It's a 'DCuck is butthurt that Marvel and Fox are both vastly superior' episode

I want to clarify.

So 94% is the highest a superhero movie managed to get at Rotten Tomatoes and the only superhero movies that were able to reach it so far are Iron Man 1, The Dark Knight, and Logan, correct?

Disney paid the WB owned company Rotten Tomatoes to make their viewers give Logan a better score

>bait: the thread

BvS was shit, as a movie and as a comic book movie

>Marvel movies do better
>Fox movies do better
>Even DC movies that aren't DCEU do better

How many people can you just think are just getting paid off at this point?

WB fanboys no where to be seen

Unthinkable

And it was good.

Logan was legit Kino, unlike BvS which fags unironically think is kino.
Best capeshit film I've seen, but that's because it wasn't paved nor did it feel like capeshit.

Did he do Berserker Barrage?

That one user you're talking about is on Sup Forums spamming about the Oscars still.

How can SnyerKINO fans even play the victim role anymore?

Also this

One movie is good, the other isn't.

They're still at it?

BvS has a middling score (4.9) while Logan has a good score (7.9). Seems reflective of the quality of the movies to me.

Well he hasn't been spamming Sup Forums so I have to assume he's on Sup Forums now. But to be honest I'm not 100% sure, I mean, it's Sup Forums I'm not spending any time in that shit hole, I spend enough of my time here in this one.

>Xmen apocalypse(Fox movie) gets shit reviews
>REEEEE THE MOUSE IS PAYING CRITICS
>Logan (another fox movie) gets flowing reviews
>REEEEEEE PAID REVIEWS!!!!!
Are DCfags really this asshurt their movies are, for the most part, incompetent movies?

Maybe it's not aesthetic that makes a good movie, but a good script. I know it's difficult for you to understand that as BvS had the same quality of writing/ respect for the source material as the Green Lantern movie, and yet you all keep screaming "KINO" at the screen like a bunch of idiots.

Rotten Tomatoes's scoring system is broken. It should be 49% Batman v. Superman and 79% Logan.

Bad movies sometimes get good scores, especially if there's tons of hype.

People have good taste. That's all.

No it should not. The percentage is the percent of critics that gave it a positive review, not a scoring percentage.

Logan is exactly what that shitshow called BvS should have been. Fucking Snyder should be forced to watch the movie so he could learn what people were talking about when they called the movie a dour piece of shit. But instead they'll continue to misunderstand it on purpose and act like people want the MCU formula instead.

>Maybe it's not aesthetic that makes a good movie, but a good script
Not like BvS had a great aesthetic anyway. I didn't like the way it looked at all, even in shots where you could clearly tell they wanted to impress you visually.

MCU is okay for shared universe lovers . FoX universe is so fucked up in its timeline they can shit good elseworlds movies with totally different tones once in a while and nobody will care about continuity. DCEU should have gone with the latter approach instead of rushing a Batman/Superman porno.

Yeah, it's amazing that BvS scored that high.

>Disney paid the WB owned company Rotten Tomatoes

its a fucking aaggregate site, you just need to bribe the critics not the fucking site.

Hey, it's DCEU shills saying they paid RT, not the other way around

>bribing 200+ critics in the hopes that not one of them will spill the beans and threaten their entire public image
That is even more fucking retarded. No company would risk that, all it takes is one journalist to leak what happened and the whole thing goes to shit.

Not to mention, Logan isn't even a Disney film.

It would be GOOD for Disney if it tanked, as it would make getting the X-Men back easier.

All 200-300 positive reviews? That's 9/11 was an inside job levels of bullshit.

i may not know why people liked logan that much,but i sure know why no one liked BvS,because is shit,pure shit

>Disney
>paying for good reviews for a movie the didn't make
Seems legit.

I love BvS UC and still Logan is better.
bvsuc 8
Logan 9

>implying 9/11 wasn't done by Bush and CIA

I liked both

They were both a good refreshing break from the MCU formula

>good refreshing break
If by good refreshing break you mean dreary depressing slog sure

In BvS' case sure.

Logan wasn't dreary, or a slog.

Over the years I've slowly realized I prefer Marvel to DC, and my opinion has been mostly influenced by film quality.

>dreary depressing
Not enough quips?

How the hell were they depressing? Logan had its sad moments but it was also pretty heartfelt.

Not everything needs to be an SNL skit you fucking subhuman

Yep, it was a good way to remind me of all the things that the Marvel flicks have done that I found enjoyable.

That's literally the only department Marvel is better in.

Comics, animated movies, video games, etc. is better with DC.

You probably belong on Sup Forums.

Logan was more upbeat, fun and colourful than Batman vs Superman.

You're retarded if you think a film with a 20 minute plot of Lois Lane trying to find out who shot a bullet and it turned out to be Lex Luther is good in any stretch.

This. Like turning Doctor Strange into a Beyonce fan. I enjoyed that.

>Wasting trips

BvS was a badly structured movie, regardless of how much symbolism there was. Logan was a great movie.

Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom is a thing though

BvS was disjointed mess almost as bad as IM2.

Logan was a road film/western that was very compact.

How is depressing stories bad when that's the point of the story? It's suppose to be the dark moments of both heroes and learning what they are fighting for by the end. It's like watching a movie based on a war and being upset that it's too violent.

I was talking about bvs in that post not logan. Logan was able to be darker without being dull

Checked em

And didn't Beyonce die like 7 years ago?

MvC is dead. The new game won't recapture the old audience.

Actually, fighting games in general are dead so it doesn't really matter.

He just said her name. Wong was the fan
Also everyone is a queen b fan

You probably should have been more clear about that. Now everybody's gonna think you're a shill

Shut up, you're the reason people defend BvS with "HURR YOU JUST WANT QUIPS"

Babies who can't handle dark movies have nothing decent to say

I thought Spider-man 2 also had 94% but it's 93%, so I guess that's right.

>Also everyone is a queen b fan

Seriously, why do I only see posts like this on Sup Forums?

>BvS was disjointed mess
This. I had to go back and rewatch several scenes to figure out what the fuck was going on. Especially that random flash-forward/dream sequence where it decided to become Injustice.

Because if a story us too depressing it gets boring

I can handle dark. Logan was fantastic and i love the nolan movies but bvs was shit

>Because if a story us too depressing it gets boring
How pleb are you? Some of the best stories and films are depressing as fuck.

>Movie that explores superhero mythos and where the protagonist dies is rotten.
>Generic road movie where the protagonist dies is upboated and fresh.

You're wrong and a bad person for being wrong.

>invited to Fox special screening a week ago
>see Hugh Jackman in the front row
Movie is fucking great by the way. Working for state TV pays off sometimes

Yes but those arent a boring disjointed mess

Shin Godzilla has a good score though

The new godzilla was great. Dont know why they changed destroyahs nane byt it was good

You literally just said

>Because if a story us too depressing it gets boring

Stop trying to change your argument, shit for brains.

Did you get to talk to him?

I like to point out that this the is RT score of the Theatrical cut that barely makes sense. A lot of reviewers that hated BvS said that the UE is much better/ and or actually liked the movie now. If it was the UE that we saw it would have been much better received.

>ighting games in general are dead
Good. They're shit.

>Shin Godzilla

Was great. If you think anything else your opinion does not and can not have any value.

>Explain this bullshit.


Deadpool and Logan

Movies without Brian Singer

>A lot of reviewers that hated BvS said that the UE is much better/ and or actually liked the movie now.

No they didn't you human fucking garbage.

The theatrical cut was a film-shaped hole where a movie should have been. The "ultimate edition" made it coherent enough that it now meets the most basic qualifications to be considered a movie.

It's still garbage, just slightly less incoherent garbage.

No, the theatrical cut made perfect sense, it was just an awful movie, this whole "You didn't understand it" and "The Ultimate version completed the movie" just sounds like damage control to me.

You were born garbage.

Would I enjoy Logan if I think Old Man Logan is a piece of garbage, despise DCEU and think that MCU shit (including Netflix) is mediocre at best or should I drop live-action capeshit altogether?

>2 hours of boardroom meetings with bland things that I can't even call characters sitting discussing politics
>Great

fuck off weeb

I've been a G fan most of my life and this film was complete trash

Is it hard going through life knowing your opinions carry no value?

The meetings and banality were exactly WHY the movie was good. It was an interesting perspective on a stale idea, and a biting satire of modern society.

You lack the mental capacity to understand that, and that's fine. There are many simple pleasures available to you more suited to your abilities.

You should drop it.

>some of the best
>the best
>best

No.

If anything, they probably had a point, unlike BvS.

But depressing movies are big garbo, my guy.

No, my friend, for I am not one of those disgusting things that thought they liked BvS.

The only question for these misguided creatures is WHY they think they liked the movie. Were they born so defective, or was it some gigantic flaw in their upbringing that so distorted them that they could ever reach that disgusting state?

Either way, they're not people.

satire is supposed to be entertaining, not making you board as hell.

There are plenty of ways they could have implemented that satire that would not be boring as balls.

BvS was utterly worthless shit but you're just embarrassing yourself here, user. Some of the most highly-regarded movies in history are depressing.

I'm not sure if you're trolling or not, but if you aren't you really need to grow up and get some more cinematic experience.