To which one do you belong to?
>Chad tier
Griffindoor
>Beta tier
Slitherin
>Retard tier
Hufflepuff
>Reddit tier
Ravenclaw
>60 questions
>give me all your data user for free
Fuck off
Ravenclaw is waifu tier
The question is where I don't belong, I don't certainly belong in any house from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
10% Hufflepuff, 45% Ravenclaw, 30% Slytherin, 25% Gryffindor, and 100% the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody; just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Teaching people with pure ancestry is a pretty shitty motivations.
Eventually every slytherin would just be a retarded incest baby.
this
OP is a joo
HUFFLEPUFF MASTER RACE
READ ANOTHER BOOK
...
This isn't /tg/, /lit/ or /qst/, tumblr
Ravenclaw, obhjectively, but I'd pick Gryffindor since Ravenclaw literally never does anything.
I swear I saw a picture on here of the hat screaming "HUFFLEPUFF" and shitting all over the person it was on. Anyone have it?
Based Snek house. Snake pride world wide
Best option would be neither, because Harry Potter is garbage
the second best option would be Slytherin, because fascism
dat Slytherin tho
You can literally choose your own house by answering the questions in the way you want.
Ravenclaw and Gryffindor are basic bitch tier, whatever
Hufflepuff seems like an artfag with a child-like personality and optimistic outlook whose sunshine and rainbows approach gets insufferable after a while
Slytherin is resting bitch face dominatrix who will treat you like garbage and then let you fuck her while she's unenthusiatically browsing her phone. will probably make fun of the fact that your dick is short or that you came too quickly
cocks...
I definitely remember that. I think it was a wojak edit.
Don't have it though, sorry.
Slytherin wins by a mile
That's like totally a Hufflepuff response, my dude. You're supposed to answer truthful.
...
None because I'm not a soyboy
this
So it's accurate to the canon, then.
>t. furry
>10% Hufflepuff, 45% Ravenclaw, 30% Slytherin, 25% Gryffindor, and 100% the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises
Based intro.
What did all the other soyboys think when you told them on 8geg, soyboy?
>You're supposed to answer truthful.
You are the true Hufflepuff.
My response like my house, was Ravenclaw. At any rate, my answers were honest.
show your muscles furry, or are you just another Sup Forumstard?
holy fuck where to cop that Moonman shirt?
Do Ravenclaw even do anything? I never recall any point in time in a movie where someone from Ravenclaw came up with a creative solution (which is what the paragraph assumed people to believe)
good goy
You have to become a level 88 sperg and you get it for free.