>They wasted millions...
They wasted millions
LOOK AT THE TOP OF HIS HEAD!!!!
To save MUHMAN the greatest DC superhero
Coco is already looking to beat Justice League, with Wonder not too far behind too
This is just embarrassing, a fucking Pixar movie and a Lionsgate movie could potentially beat a movie featuring Batman, Superman AND Wonder Woman, not to mention how Flash is more popular a character now thanks to the TV show for normie audiences
to save billions
>needs to make a billion to turn a profit
This isn't happening.
$300 million production + $200 million promotion= $500 million production
Because theaters get 50% of the total worldwide profit, this movie needs around $1 billion to break even.
No, they've already made a profit. They already made more than $300m
Fucking marvelshills
JUST
They worked out exact percentages and it's 53% to WB and 47% to theatres
STILL not enough to break even tho hahaha
The adults are talking, go back to the kids table
>No, they've already made a profit. They already made more than $300m
t. "I DON'T UNDERSTAND BOX OFFICE" pajeet
>53% of box office goes back to the studios
>ideally the studios want to make at least double the budget to break even
>PRODUCTION + reshoots alone costed $300 million
>marketing usually costs around $150 million
>this film has been heavily marketed so let's stick with $150 million
>costed at least $100 million to distribute
Where's the 200M on marketing? Don't they usually spend something like 120-150M?
>What will this mean for Acquachad, Robotic Negro and the fastest queer on Earth?
Maybe that no one care about neither of these faggots?
It will be $150 million minimum
This thing's been advertised anywhere and everywhere, they released the first trailer in Summer 2016, if they just waited to release marketing til this year they could have covered a lot of their costs
>To save billions
>to waste even more millions
...
YEAAAAAH!
Ultimately we believe the price was worth it
wow, wtf man. this guy works out for 8 hours day but can't afford a can of spray hair? pathetic.
>not posting the true "MY MAN" face
pathetic
will it beat this?
I have a feeling this actually won't make much money
It won't flop by any means, but it'll be like Dr Strange or Homecoming and underperform with a 90 something on RT and then everyone forgets about i
>that klaw poster
>when they ask where all the vibranium went
>His wife's son
nice subtle shoop
>Dr Strange or Homecoming
>underperforming
They did though
They never spent $200m, that's the same as TFA
Maybe $100-125m tops
I'm sure TFA only spent
I wonder if that's even worth pirate it
Wonder is not even the type of movie to be a blockbuster
test
Lmao you're so fucking stupid
They released WW and It this year and they were more profitable than this flopped. This just allows them to hide profits from other stuff through Hollywood accounting.
They didn't make $1billion, so they didn't make a profit
BvS had $150 - 160 million spent on marketing. It'd only make sense that Justice League would have more
the director did Creed, but all I ever see on /tv /about it is the typical WE posts and how select retards on twitter think Africa would actually be like that if there were no white people around.
All the SJW whining and virtue signaling in social media ruined any kind of objective criticism on this board because any and all movies featuring blacks are now seen to be forced diversity or whatever.
Latinos and Samoans are ok though
You're memeing right?
Well I hate to see with because its so diverse
Shitposting aside, I probably will watch it. I mean I sat through Justice League, Im sure I could sit through this.
all investors don't invest in all movies
investors for WW and IT only are happy
investors for WW, IT and JL are not so happy
investors for JL only are fucking pissed
dr strange made 700 million worldwide for a character normies had never even heard of.
spiderman i'll give you though.
What? No.
actually after doing the research spiderman made 880 million worldwide. better than i remembered for sure. more than any DC movie so far including wonder woman.
not sure why DCucks are still pushing that false narrative.
I know enough from threads like this to know that films need $1b+ to make profit.
only if they're bloated movies like justice league with extremely expensive reshoots and huge marketing budgets. marvel movies not counting the avengers are almost all made for fewer than $200 million.
>all these brown qts.
That¨s seems like a lot. Where do people get these numbers?
>Disndians
By your logic every movie should be a fucking flop
Whedon unironically asked WB to give him 500 millions to reshoot JL AGAIN for the bluray release
>all these
>literally 0
Spider-Man:
$175m production + $150m advertising + $100m distribution = $425m, means they needed $850m minimum on box office returns to turn a profit. A huge flop for a Spider-Man movie.
Dr. Strange:
>$165m production + $150m advertising + $100m distribution = $415m. They lost about $160m on it.
>$175m production + $150m advertising + $100m distribution = $425m, means they needed $850m minimum on box office returns to turn a profit. A huge flop for a Spider-Man movie.
>made 880 million which is more than the last 3 movies made which were more expensive to make
>duh it flopped
By your own calculations you are wrong, you're a fucking moron who needs chemical castration.
Which means at minimum it only turned a profit of $30m. A huge flop considering the brand.
My friends and I are going to try to raise awareness of this movie by shitting the logo onto the street here in New Delhi. If you can stop by to help us finish the word LEAGUE, we'll provide curry and spoiled lentils to the first twenty people to show up to help with the shitting. By Ganesha's grace we'll make DC cool again.
Where are you getting this '$100m distribution' from?
If they needed 100 million only to distribute a movie, every movie made for under $50m would be fucked.
This dude
you fucking moron