Was Kubrick just fucking with the audience with this ending?
Was Kubrick just fucking with the audience with this ending?
Other urls found in this thread:
Yea
...
No, he was always the caretaker.
Really makes you think about (((them))) faking the moon landing. Kubrick was ahead of his time.
If that was the intent the fingers would be matching
that would make it too obvious
Oh yeah that'd make it too obvious not the fucking placement of his arms?
Yes because if someone saw the fingers matching, just about anyone in the theater would go "OH! THAT'S BAPHOMET!"
You fucking idiot.
Jack was instrumental to the False Flag of the Titanic sinking, which killed off millionaires opposed to the Federal Reserve, abolishing the gold standard and led to the Great War.
His punishment for selling his soul like this was to eternally become the caretaker of the overlook, and he must keep being drawn back to it.
Too obvious. Kubrick must be aware of this.
He always been vague about everything.
What did Tarentino mean by this? That the average movie goer is as bad as a Nazi?
this picture makes more sense if the original ending, in which wendy wakes up at the hospital and is told she was never married to anyone named "jack", wasn't removed by kubrick.
Is this true
This is all I've been thinking about all the past two weeks. I ended up watching Kubrick Movies again too look for the way he does things. I even watched the shit mini series for something. The picture makes no sense and it's always bugged me.
Staircases to Nowhere: Making Stanley Kubrick's "The Shining"
>The full oral history story of the making of Stanley Kubrick's horror masterpiece "The Shining". Contributions from nine crew members who worked on the film and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane. We believe this is the most in-depth exploration into the making of "The Shining" on film, from the perspective of those who actually worked on the production. Additional content includes memories of the fire at Elstree, a more in-depth look at the Stages at Elstree and the Steadicam, the work of the Second Unit on the film and what it was like to work with Kubrick.
>Was Kubrick just fucking with the audience with this ending?
as above as below? no its still on track with the native-american massacre subtheme of the movie.
*again to
based on what i read a while ago, but i can't find the source
Was Kubrick warning us about the Illuminati or what?
I mean yeah. That's made pretty clear in the part where normies are supposed to feel sickened by the Nazi's rabid love of propaganda violence only to cheer when they get blown up and lit on fire.