This was just alright

It wasn't bad but it wasn't capekino either. Pretty middle of the road like Deadpool(which was "R eddit: The Movie").

It has some narrative problems that hold it back.

About the same level as BvS

>It has some narrative problems that hold it back.
Such as?

Not being flippant.
I watched it and while not the greatest movie ever, it's definitely better than the Marvel super-action movies where the characters aren't chararcters and the plot isn't a plot.

>Either implying BvS was a decent movie or Logan is offensively bad

What did you actually mean by this?

well meme'd m8

I didn't think it properly set up the near future world Logan lived in. Big things like what happened to the mutants, Charles, and the X-Men are explained through exposition. I just think those things needed more gravitas.

I hated how a no-name villain at the end just nonchalantly reveals he wiped out the mutants with a virus or something.

Did you want like a flashback or something?

that scientist guy didn't kill all the mutants. He just prevented new mutations from occurring.

BvS was way better.

I think it did exactly what it should. Anything else would have been out of place, or against the tone. It's a definite step up from a lot of superhero popcorn eaters.

My main problem was with how vague they were with the whole "what did you do logan" part. It's never made clear as to what happened to the rest of the xmen.

Sure, it's implied that professor x killed them with a seizure, but its never confirmed. Even some brief flashes before he wakes up for the last time would have sufficed to convey what happened without going into full exposition mode.

Yeah there were some anti-plot-holes, not plot holes but literally lacuna in the movie where pertinent information is not given out.

But it's okay, sometimes a movie doesn't have to fill in all the blanks.

I really felt like the movie pandered to dumbasses myself. It didn't have the confidence to let anything hang there without throwing a moment-ruining explanatory sentence into the script. And its use of violence was so comic book-y, and in some ways the worst stripe of that, while the movie itself actively sought to distance itself from comic books. It could have been a lot more adventurous on all fronts.

I didn't hate Deadpool at all but I do agree with OP the two are similar: "passable-good genre movie with a superhero blend"

>It's never made clear as to what happened to the rest of the xmen.

From now on, all people complaining about Logan are comfirmed retards, they explained that shit multiple times

>And its use of violence was so comic book-y

Idiots complaining at 11

it was confirmed on the radio broadcast in the car after the casino scene

>capekino
>"R eddit: The Movie"
Why don't you keep your shitposting to Sup Forums, faggot.

haha epic meme my dude

Are you arguing with that? It feels cheap when a movie wears its influences so heavily while disregarding them in the text at the same time.

I completely disagree, I think the way they handled it was perfect, and flashbacks would have killed the experience.

that's just autismo talking, the movie referenced comic book shit a lot while going for a grounded feel, so fucking what?

Have you read the Marvel Max books? This movie was basically a movie going for that tone which is what the market needs right now.

You are just a contrarian with such a non complain

Also that costume looks DUUUUUUMB in live action, get the fuck over it!

Batman has a way cooler costume that has similar details and even his costumes have a hard time being tranlated into live action, now imagine freaking yellow expandex! And no, that costume that they did for The Wolverine or some shit looks goofy as shit too

>grounded feel

>all the kids with superpowers running away from men who aren't shooting to kill them

How come an adamantium bullet is enough to krill a wolverine but adamantium claws through the head aren't?

Kinetic difference.

There was actually supposed to be a scene with Charles fucking up and killing the X-men in the start, but luckily it didn't make it into the actual movie. Not showing exactly what happened makes it better imo.

We already know Charles had an 'accident' in Westchester/at the school, which killed multiple mutants, and was so horrible Logan won't tell him what happened and keeps him drugged so it won't happen again and Charles won't remember killing his own students.

He then remembers what happened after waking up at the farm and begins crying and saying he's a bad person. We don't need more.

That is actually objectively wrong

>capekino
>Reddit The Movie
9/10 made me respond