Would you find all these crappy new "replacement" characters at the big two more palatable if they followed traditional...

Would you find all these crappy new "replacement" characters at the big two more palatable if they followed traditional superhero values rather than looking and sounding like webcomics characters that wandered into a superhero book? It's kind of an issue with a lot of them, especially the ones at Marvel. Even established characters catch this when a shitty enough writer and artist come along, like say Mockingbird or Squirrel Girl. New characters like Spider-Gwen and similar stand no chance.

The problem I've had with these characters is that they're not being brought in as new characters they're being brought in as replacements to old ones. Which they're obviously only doing for headlines and not because they have interesting ideas for these storylines.

Should have given her a huge ass to match White Power girl's huge rockin' tits

What was Gwen Stacy's character in the first place?
What was Power Girl's character in the first place?

Mockingbird, Squirrel Girl... these are all meme characters. They were rebooted to keep creeps like you on Sup Forums from liking them anymore.

Notice how you didn't mention any of the male legacy characters like Blue Beetle, Ghost Rider or Brown Recluse Spider-Man.

Yeah, that's right.
You even skipped over Sup Forums's favorite writer's pet boy, Miles.

Face it OP. You only hate books like Wasp and Hellcat because they are female protagonists. I bet you're busy jacking off to SuperSons /ss/ r34 as I type this. Sup Forums has always been the gayest board rivaling even /y/ and /fa/. Just come out and admit you are gay for Dicks both Ryder and Grayson and stop pretending your issue with the fem-legacy books is the quality.

If Power Girl was a maga-cap sporting redpilled
meme-spouting Ben Carson token minority hire like Wally West you'd be hooting and cheering in thread after thread calling him /ourguy/.

Also, those boots are disgusting, OP. no amount of brown thighs can fix that abomination.

>Mockingbird, Squirrel Girl... these are all meme characters. They were rebooted to keep creeps like you on Sup Forums from liking them anymore.

Squirrel Girl I can see but Mockingbird?

/ss/ is straight, dumbass.

Nigga you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding over what the first s in ss stands for.

So that's what "triggered" means

>/ss/
>Gay
Boys fucking women is gay now? Truly, this is the worst future.

Are you seriously implying that the version on the right looks better?

I would find them all more palatable if they had giant tits and wore skimpy outfits.

Fixed, you uncultured swine.

fundamentally false.

>that picture
Her costume really isn't the problem here. Everyone claiming otherwise is either completely retarded or a falseflagging SJW.

Considering Sup Forums, I guess either option is equally likely.

shut up

cut out all the yellow from her costume and give her a thong and double sided tape for her nipples

Honestly, the only improvement from the right picture is the jacket.

The outfit on the left is pretty good, while the right is only suitable for some kind of porn parody. The left hairstyle is impractical, but it's also cute and makes her instantly recognizable so it's fine. It's not like superheroes care a great deal about what's practical anyway.

The only part I'm a bit divided about is the boob window. On the one hand it's silly and doesn't really fit the costume. On the other, it's the most iconic thing about Power Girl (which I guess is saying something about Power Girl...) and a nice cheeky way of referencing her, more effectively than the gold disc design is anyway.

It'd be perfect if you got rid of the puffballs and just let her hair frizz out.

You are taking things way too seriously, friend.

>The outfit on the left is pretty good, while the right is only suitable for some kind of porn parody.

The other way around. The left one looks like a comic-accurate version from a porn parody, and the right one is the 90s extreme redesign.

>You are taking things way too seriously, friend.
But where's the fun in not taking it seriously?

I know the "redesign" is most likely just taking the piss, but costume desing is often a hotly debated subject among fans. When a non-serious design has some elements that are actually better than the original (like the jacket), there's no harm in pointing out what works and what doesn't.

You kind of have a point, there.

>Supersons /ss/ gay

Hm, okay. Just as long as you're against the intention behind the design.

Honestly, I kind of like this one better, but this too would benefit from a longer jacket.

>The left hairstyle is impractical, but it's also cute and makes her instantly recognizable
black girl with afro puffs
instantly recognizable

Name one DC heroine with hair like that.

This is a really bad thread, OP.

Stop fucking up the hair.

Not him but, okay?

It cracks me up so much when you see someone on Sup Forums go on a giant tirade and have no clue what they're talking about. I know this guy is just memeing but it's cracking me up just how wrong it is.

marvel legacies currently fall into 3 types...

type A. in which they're able to stand out from their predecessors and be their own characters (ghost rider, nova & arguebly ms. marvel)

type B. in which they're never allowed to be their own characters and will probably be a triva question in a few years faster than type A will be (spiderman, thor, iron man)

type C. an already established character taking up the mantle of they're predecessor because they can't carry a book on their own (captain america & wolverine)

Which Marvel legacy character did OP post?

You first. The puffs are ugly.

he posted power girl which DC but she would fall under type B

But senpai.
Son.
Bruh.
don't you get it?
don't you understand?
do you not realize???
they are Power Puffs.

This pretty much.

Sorry but the OP edit has the best hair. The puffs are shit.

God damn. Such shit taste.

I think you're forgetting that E0 Peeg has fetish fuel powers already. Anything she does is automatically lewd.

That's not her design

The only legacy character anyone cares about is Kamala.

Hum...

Not true, people love Barry Allen and Wally West.

Bumblebee has been around for years and she didn't replace anybody.

But the original Nightwing was a Kryptonian, not a Gotham City avenger...

...

What's your point? Dick chose the name explicitly due to being inspired by the story and Superman.

And Dick isn's a legacy character because...?

He is and one way more successful in that than fucking Kamala.

im sure he means Marvel legacies.

Dicks back?!

Come on, right would never appear in a comic these days. Come the fuck on.

That looks so much better.

Guy isn't exactly a legacy. He was just another GL at the same time as Hal.

Some of the books would be palatable if they at least had decent art. Some of the other new characters I would've enjoyed more if they were pitched as sidekicks to existing heroes, then later spun-off into their own thing if they ended up popular.

Every GL corpsman is by definition a legacy character though.

>Would you find all these crappy new "replacement" characters at the big two more palatable if they followed traditional superhero values

But they do and they don't replace anyone because the originals keep doing their thing anyway. All they are is legacy characters that trigger people for whatever reason. Shit just don't buy the book simple enough.

I don't, and DC is much better at this because they give enough of a shit to change characters names... Most of the time anyway.

So there isn't 3 different Spider-men named "Spider-man" running around.

>because they give enough of a shit to change characters names... Most of the time anyway. So there isn't 3 different Spider-men named "Spider-man" running around.

ahem...

replacements would be ok in setting where characters stay dead, age, retire, etc.

>Sup Forums circa 2013

why does Toph have four nipples?

You would think the comics industry would have learned from it's past mistakes since 1961, but I guess it just goes to show comics was never meant to be taken seriously as a storytelling medium to begin with.

>>Squirrel Girl

Bitch, what?

because she's the greatest?

If they acted either a) in a cheesecakian way, or b)were built like original characters and values outside of identity politics or agenda vehicles, you'd still have bitching because of who they're replacing.

If you had them guest appearing to build up interest and then started them off in their own thing, you would get a lot more traction but the problem with normal mode of things is that takes time.

If you haven't noticed a lot of their business model is absorbing pre-existing character niches and shoving their agenda into it and mutilating the character to fit it.

They want to take franchises which at this point, (Wolverine, Kamala) pretty much any of the new hero adoptions have all tried the Force Awakens formula of putting something different in an old franchise.

Even if an individual writer happens to not be apart of that agenda or character strategy..as a whole how would you differentiate?

How would you know a waifuist defending Kamala is doing it for a real reason? That is problem with bias, it takes time to figure out what other person is doing and by that point damage is already done.

pic would be better if they kept the hair tbqh

but you just made her hair MORE tumblry. her puffpuff hair is cute. also i like small boobies. that's the good part of ... of whoever this is.
why cant we get more underboob for smallboobled women?

That picture is fucking pathetic. It's embarrassing that this is still the mentality of so many comic fans.

The boob window is pointless if she's half naked, you know.

>traditional superhero values
>90s costume

Pick one