Is this Kubrick's magnum opus?

Is this Kubrick's magnum opus?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Z1IncRZ9BiE
youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU
youtube.com/watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic&t=10s
youtube.com/watch?v=0mzh-CWImMA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>this thread again
STOP THIS IMMEDIATELY

Snorkels in spacesuits man.

Nope, that would be 2001: A Space Odyssey

this that movie made the "moon landings" possible
pre heat to 237* and bake for a year
Homer was good Kubrick was better

Everyone knows Kubrick faked the moon landing.

He just had to film it on location.

Based Kubrick
Hihi, I love his films.

Someone post the green screen webbum.

It's by far his greatest work. Funny how you can't find any trace of the so called moon landers.

>americans faked the moon landing
Yeah, no shit. Only amerimutts think it was real, the soviet union were decades ahead of them in terms of technology.

Say what happend to the user who posted about the true meaning of 2001? Is he/she still alive?

No this was

Moron.
Moon Hoax Theory dead - killed by rabbit!
youtube.com/watch?v=Z1IncRZ9BiE

Hey I've got a question to any science wiz out there.

How come there aint no fucking visible stars on a planet with no atmosphere, in space?

...

youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU

Is being European this day and age a mental illness in of itself?

You obviously know nothing about cameras.

ITT: flattards from Sup Forums

>Euro-inbreds still mad that America went to the moon

How come we haven't been back to the moon?
I read somewhere that they said that they "lost" the calculations and how to build the rocket.

Fucking bullshit.

you have ten seconds to tell me how this thing had enough fuel on it to propel off the moon and towards earth

Same reason you can't see the stars in the sky over Earth in the daytime, you stupid moron.

no thats because the sun is shining YOU moron
its night on the fucking moon, the sky is black
see???

You are truly braindead. It's only night on the dark side of the moon, just like it's only night on the dark side of the earth. Why are you so stupid?

find me 1 (one) professional photographer who thinks this question is legitimate

>I read somewhere that they said that they "lost" the calculations and how to build the rocket.
oh piss off

You don't need to be a professional anything to realize that you can't see the stars in the sky when the sun is shining bright outside. All you need is common sense, and an IQ level above that of a retard.

thats literally a fact though you shill

Because the moon is only 1/6th the mass of the earth, which means that the moon's gravity is only 1/6th of the gravity on earth, which means that the lander on the moon weighs only 1/6th of what it weighs on the earth, and requires only 1/6th the amount of fuel it would require to carry it to escape velocity, which in turn would only be 1/6th the velocity it would need to escape the gravitational pull of the earth.

Don't they teach you stupid children anything besides racism and identity politics in school anymore?

Dont you faggots know there was multiple moon landings? Wouldn't Soviets had exposed fake moon landings back In the day?

They sent it up with a fucking rocket not a little spastic turd

The energy used to leave earth would be 1000 times greater than the energy that piece of shit could produce

How? They never got there so they couldn't inspect the alleged landing sites.

All you are doing here is showing how incredibly stupid you are. You would do yourself a favor if you'd shut the fuck up.

Check Soviet rovers and also try thinking

yeah, and how long did it survive up there? like 2 hours?
just send fucking humans or dont do it at all.

Several telescopes all over the earth can see man made structures left on the moon, there's several of them, including a giant mirror that reflects observatory's lasers so we can calculate the exact distance between the moon and the earth.
Observatories of any country, including post soviet Russia, can see those things.

How can you miss the point so completely

you're the one talking about sending mutts up into space.

Scientists were able to bounce lasers off the moon before they landed on it. The giant mirror left behind is not a valid argument.

It is there, it is physically there and can be seen. That's not even an argument, it's just a thing that exists.

Not an argument. Scientists were able to bounce lasers from the moon prior to landing on it.

Show me a picture of the mirror please.

Oops!

The ALSEP.

Funny, but show me a real picture now.

youtube.com/watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic&t=10s

youtube.com/watch?v=0mzh-CWImMA

Marcus Allen

They lost the telemetry data and the footage also several freak accidents associated with the moon landing

Now THAT is not an argument.
Go buy yourself a lunar telescope.

>lol just show me a picture of something less than a foot wide taken from hundreds of thousands of kilometres away
there are pictures taken from satellites orbiting the moon () but I assume that you don't give a shit

No but seriously, you say multiple telescopes on earth can clearly see it, and you would think with all the satellites and space stations and what not that someone would have been able to photograph a large, distinct picture of the mirror. And if the picture posted was from a satellite orbiting the moon, it's awful small considering how close it was taken.

>you say multiple telescopes on earth can clearly see it
fuck
off
a LASER can reflect almost perfectly off of it, that's not the same as an image

As I said before, scientists were able to bounce lasers off the moon prior to landing on it.

Are you being serious? You want a large distinct picture of a 2 meter object ON THE SURFACE OF THE FUCKING MOON?
You can see it's not natural, we know things that occur in nature and landrovers aren't one of them.

Are you a mongoloid? Youre a genuine disinfo agent, you should feel ashamed.

No I'm not serious I was just fucking around because I was bored, and now I have to get to the liquor store before it closes. Have a nice night.

So he was only pretending

Yes, fake moon landings/flat earth are actually pretty fun to pretend to be retarded about. it really sets people off.

...

2001 was literally the most boring movie I ever watched.

HURR A 5 MINUTE SEQUENCE OF A SPACE SHUTTLE LANDING ON THE MOON REALLY FUCKING SLOWLY WHILE CLASSICAL MUSIC PLAYS SO DEEP

Eyes Wide Shut will always be his best. Movie got him killed it was so good.

Gud post

not to nearly the same effectiveness, the moon is a really shit mirror

>Eyes Wide Shut will always be his best. Movie got him killed it was so good.

It was one of his best, the moon landing was the best. He even left clues about it in the Shining.

who could say. besides Nasa telling you this and that.

They took a wrong turn and landed on Mars, so they colour corrected the film and that's why it looks so off.

don't try to make us look like retards you fucking government shill lackey fuck
theres a billion different things about the "moon landings" that don't make sense and people have proofed that for YEARS but you just keep lying and lying and lying. Why? Why do you do it?
get the fuck out of here

bruh the dude was 70 years old they probably let him die of natural causes and then took the blame.

American education must be something else.

Kubrick was a hack

...

Big if true.

Yeah a great feat euros are still unable to achieve

>Big if true.
Big if true.

Why are Anons responding to obvious trolls? It's like being on IMDB forums again.

Would those suits be enough protection against the extreme temperatures, potential debris fragments rocketing around since the moon has no real atmosphere, and constant exposure to high levels of radiation? Also shouldn't the surface of the moon be significantly brighter?

No one knows.

>>pictures of blurry blots are what I am told they are.

>its night on the fucking moon
No it isn't

That picture suits you, nigger.

yes
yes
yes
what is exposure

>>conveniently lost all the original footage/data of the most significant achievement in human history

You could probably do a quick Google search and figure out how the landing craft works in about five minutes rather than asking people on Sup Forums to explain it to you

>don't try to make us look like retards you fucking government shill lackey fuck
You've already got that covered

>potential debris fragments rocketing around
Not very likely. The moon still has gravity

If the USSR had had any reason to suspect a hoax, they would have exposed it. So unless you think the USSR and US were working in cahoots to pull of the hoax... I'm pretty sure it wasn't a hoax.

But what if they were?

Only people that live literally in the woods think the moon landing was a hoax.
I've once talked to hillbillies about it, it was fucking embarrassing. At one point he said that cars needed to be hand cranked to start when they went to the moon (which isn't true, his pop's car was just old because they lived in a backwards shithole) and could only go a few kilometers with a tank full, how could they get to the moon using gasoline.
This is true, this fucker thought they used car gasoline in rockets and not rocket fuel. He also didn't realize that most of the ship is the fuel tanks and the space ship itself is just the tip.

You have Down’s syndrome.

Maybe you could actually bring people to your side if you laid out an actual argument instead of belittling them. Just saying.

Because there's fuck all up there

Low grav and no atmo. It only had to support two astronauts and only had to make it up to the main space craft. Once the astronauts boarded the main craft, the lander was discarded. Since the moon has no atmo you can orbit extremely low, so the lander only really needed enough energy to velocity match the main craft. They also left a bunch of shit needed for landing on the surface to reduce weight, and the lander was literally made of poles and foil.

Doing the same for Mars is a pure fantasy though. The first people we send there are going to spend a decade or more on the surface because you'd need a full rocket to escape the gravity well and atmo.

>Since the moon has no atmo you can orbit extremely low

If this is true, how come satellites can't orbit low enough to get decent pictures of the items and equipment left behind?

They can. But why would they?
Several countries probably have seen the objects on the moon, but why would they announce that? It's more likely that they would announce if there was nothing there. And they don't, because they know there is.
You people need to understand that after they have confirmed the americans went to the moon 6 times there's nothing else to talk about it, there's nothing interesting up there until we have the means to harvest helium 3.

>But why would they?

Um, to dispel the rumors that the landing was fake. Didn't bother to read the rest of your post after that line.

>why can't a fake technology take photos of another fake thing

Nothing will dispel the rumors, that's how conspiracies work. Any attempt to dispel one and show evidence is just met with "WELL YOU'RE TRYING PRETTY HARD TO DISPROVE THIS WHAT ARE YOU HIDING PS THIS LOOKS PHOTOSHOPPED"

Oh, you mean NASA? They brought rocks that can't exist anywhere on earth and gave out like candy to several laboratories of several countries. That didn't convince the civilian cow herd, you think they care about proving anything at this point?

There's not a single argument contradicting the landing that can't be refuted,

Research the science somewhere other than /x/, you stupid moron, and you just might find the answers.

We literally have video and pictures of people on the moon and that's not good enough. We have all the math and physics nailed down too, almost as if someone did them in preparation for actually doing it. Anyone with a brain can run the numbers and figure out it's possible. Dumb niggers like you will say the video is photoshop and the math is a nasa conspiracy and physics aren't real. Hecking kiss yourself brainlet.

What do you mean? There were multiple manned missions to the Moon. There haven't been any since because there is literally nothing for humans to do up there, there's zero point risking human lives when you can send a robot to sift through some moon dust. The only reason we put people on the Moon is so we could say "look what we did", the next step is Mars.

Weak.