What's going to happen when Hollywood is owned by just 1 or 2 corporations?

What's going to happen when Hollywood is owned by just 1 or 2 corporations?

more khazar milkers hopefully

Indie movies will gain more attention.

>khazar milkers

Will never happen

OP's graph is old, it's already down to 5, CBS and viacom merged.

soon to be 4 if disney/news corp is approved.

And what difference does it make whether 100 or 1 company controls everything?

Well there's always the internet for entertainment...

get your homework done yet? get to bed, bus comes early

why do the people who want strong centralized authoritarian governments not want strong centralized authoritarian corporations?

...

How is that a strawman?

Won't have to worry about net neutrality or having to juggle a few dozen streaming services

Damn, how does the media get away with being so (((anti-Islamic)))? Do they hate diversity?

here is a new one

Fuck, a lot of difference
Having a single company controlling a whole fucking field was the Chinese tactic for years
Imagine trying to control 200.000 small businesses and companies. Pretty hard, uh? Sure you can do it, but it's not practical.

Chinese government pushed for consolidation, now they have like 8 big corporations. That means that government has direct control over literally everything relevant in the country.

Hollywood is already bending over to Chinese movie laws and standards because they need to; imagine your own government being able to give direct orders to entire "creative" fields/industries.
Now, imagine what would happen in a country where corporations have more power than the government.

Did you have a stroke and post the wrong image or are you just that stupid?

>strong centralized authoritarian governments
This thread is not about and no one is talking about "strong centralized authoritarian governments" you commie baby.

If you think having all of the media controlled by a very few is a good thing, make your argument why you think that's a good thing.

The media is a very powerful thing that greatly influences society. It being in just a few hands greatly increases the likelyhood of it being used as a propaganda tool as only a narrow spectrum of people will be controlling the content put out to the masses.

>be "superior race"
>constantly outsmarted, manipulated, and generally BTFO by "inferior race"
>said "inferior race" had higher IQ and higher ownership of wealth, success, and political power

rly makes me think....

Do dumb whites want affirmative action so they can compete?

ONE

THOUSAND

REPOSTS