Yes yes, well done Slytherin well done Slytherin, HOWEVER!

Yes yes, well done Slytherin well done Slytherin, HOWEVER!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=351Aa5q_S98
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

...

...

I like to imagine Draco's attempted murder on Dumbledore was actually about this and not whatever Voldemort said to him.

...

...

...

...

why is this thread funny, they're just pictures

this really was bullshit

kek Slytherin eternally btfo

The Harry Potter Holiday Marathon will continue after these messages

>sweet guitar riff
>Get your skis shined up, grab a stick of Juicy Fruit. The taste is gonna move ya!

I watched this meme die last year after 2 months of overusing and now you're telling me we have enough newfags that dont know about it? How fucking fast is Sup Forums growing?

Why even bother behaving and doing well in class if Gryffindor is just gonna win every year because Dumbledore is an unabashedly biased fuck?

"No!"

I'm sure it will come back for the World Cup

>almost time in England for the Harry Potter TV marathon
>ITV air them every Christmas

However well Slytherin might have done doesn't excuse the fact that this is the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

youtube.com/watch?v=351Aa5q_S98

just post the video cunt

Shocking waste of digits. You fucked it all up.

based

herp derp le harry potter is bad meme! kino!

I fucking hate you virgin man babies that cant appreciate the truly greatest fiction ever written. fuk you

"No!"

however?

fuck all of you virgin drumpfkins I hate you all

>stone won an oscar
>ronan is in one of the best films of the year
>emma watson is in hiding because shes harveys cumslut
how is he coping lads?

However well Slytherin might have done doesn't excuse the fact that this is the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

fuck you are raping this pasta In the ass

>HOWEVER thread
>it survives more than 30 seconds

harry potter is the one series that tv unanimously loves to hate and hates to love at the same time