What's the appeal of this movie?

What's the appeal of this movie?

I'm halfway through and kinda bored

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wKiIroiCvZ0
youtu.be/WojvlJ_xibE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

seeing it in cinema

should've seen it when it was out in theatres you lonely fuck

>imagine actually watching Dunkino on a fucking laptop

I'm not watching it on my laptop. That shouldn't matter anyway.

So it's one of those "experience" films with shitty writing, like Avatar or 2001?

Haven't seen it but from what I've heard it celebrates the bravery of the English soldiers and the English fishermen who actually sailed to France to get /theirguys/.

The England of yesteryear.

Fpbp

Wait hol up hol up is this bait?
Are you actually watching it on your fucking phone?

Just finished it. Was so good. What did you find unappealing about it?
The movie is semi-realistic portrayal of a notable moment in WWII history. It's worth watching if you're even remotely interested in WWII for that alone.

kill yourself you adhd ridden faggot

The movie follows some English soldiers who throw away their rifles the first time some Germans shoot at them, then spend the entire movie sneakily trying to queue jump (the most unBritish thing imaginable) the evacuation lines.

It's convenient.

I load it up via my plex server

yeah boring ass shit, I didnt finish it and deleted it.
cant believe I risked getting a letter from y ISP for this garbage, but I'm glad I didnt spend money on it.

If you are unironically watching films like that then please my dear friend slit your wrists

kino post

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever.

>1080x600
>on a fucking phone
>4 inches wide by 2 inches tall

>trying to communicate with amerimals?
What's the use user?

americans can read?

I use subtitles for all movies/tv shows but that's because my hearing sucks

Top tier bait

yes yes good goy watch it in imax! yes yes big screen, plus more sheke- i mean better sound yes yes good goy

You're about to get BTFO by Lynch

youtube.com/watch?v=wKiIroiCvZ0

it's shit

>There are people in this very thread who will never experience Dunkirk in glorious 70mm

>when you're over the age of 16 and, thus, no longer impressed by non-linear editing

...

You should not be impressed, it should just serve the story you dumb fuck

It doesn't, though. At all.

>imagine calling this garbage movie ‘dunkino’

There is only one dunkino

youtu.be/WojvlJ_xibE

It's crucial for it to be non linear because by seeing those moments again you get a bigger picture of the situation which is told extremely subjectively from every perspective and to form a coherent interconnected story with those moments, also even more tension bulilding (that Spitfire pilot crash landing on water, looks like he's giving a thumbs up that he's okay to Hardy - cut later - he's actually struggling to get out of the Spitfire so he doesn't drown and the cockpit is stuck because of the hard impact on water)

The air narrative takes place in one hour, the sea narrative in one day and the land narrative in one week so the viewer stays in the battle at all time.
If you had a linear representation of that whole week then you would have Tom Hardy sitting in an airbase somewhere sipping tea and wanking off to pictures of dear old Marge, and Dunkirk wasn't about that fake empathy/sentimentality, it was about being thrown into the event itself.

It's a Hollywood blockbuster with a full white brit male cast with zero quips, nazi name calling or shoved diversity in 2017, be grateful that something like this exists now.

Oh so they needed to jump backwards and forwards in time because otherwise the movie would be a week long?

Go fuck yourself.

fight the power brother the nazi hatred needs to end, remember /ourguy/ nolan!

still boring as fuck

A movie about war that depicts cowardice

there was no a$ap in the trailer so I never even bothered

It was ok, not bad but nothing special. Nice cinematography I guess.

Movie would've been better if XXXTentacion did the soundtrack imho

It's Transformers bro,

Transformers is too confusing for me (visually)

Half the time I can't figure out what the hell is going on because all the robots look the same

It's ok just turn off your brain, just like Transformers.

is it purposefully so unsuspenseful?

this
>the pic
>comparing 2001 to avatar
so many layers

Underrated

>England's most iconic war moment is running away

DELETE

To be fair, some bong accents sound like their mouths are full of cock and it's hard to understand shit. Take Tom Hardy in a show like Taboo for example. Can't understand a fucking thing that comes out his mouth half the time.

It was hard watching this shit to the end. One of the worst war movies ever, bravo Nolan.

Someone tell me what's the difference.

have you even fought in a war?

Waterloo is one of the most decisive victories in history

There's also the fact nolan film's soundmixing is "make all the dialogue impossible to hear, then blow out their eardrums with explosions!"

One made a billion dollarydoos

One had Shia Labeouf as the lead

Just teasing lad. The British Military is one of the best in the world.

>shitty editing
>shitty music
>couldnt care less about any of the characters
>laconic dialogue that makes Drive seem too talktive
>HUR I BET YOU NEVER FOUGHT A WAR

Kill yourself brainlet

>moobies need likable garagders and fooney dialogue do be gud