Revolver has capacity for 6 bullets

>revolver has capacity for 6 bullets
>characters shoots tens of bullets like a madman without reloading

>character forced to play Russian roulette
>uses a semi-auto

>tens

What's the word for "groups of ten" in English? Dozens sounded like too much

most revolvers have capacity of 7 bullets actually

just specify "more than six" you autist

>double barrel sxs shotgun
>pump-action

There isn't one, the closest is Dozens and Scores which is 20's or something, that is why when there is a terrorist attack you will often hear, from British news at least (Scores wounded....).

a dozen is two more than ten retard

Name one movie where this happens

A guy got a Darwin award for killing himself this way.

>character threatens character with pump action shotgun
>we have already seen him load it
>he gets angry and pumps it again uselessly depositing the shell that was already in the gun

What if he needed that one later? Does he awkwardly pick it up off the floor?

there is no need to be rude, my English is rather poor and we don't use the word "dozen" so often, we use what would be "groups of ten"

Some Russian did it in real life.

irl a Russian did that.
He lost.
There is a news article on it.

We normally say "a few pairs of five", when we order burgers...

proofs

Google it

This is not a valid response you fucking retard

>asking to be spoonfed when you're not even arguing
come on

No you fucking idiot, the burden of proof is on you, saying google it like a retard proves that you don't actually have any proof so shut the fuck up .

>Character has a Machete
>Fucking producers decide to make some dumb short about the weapons life

I should seriously blow my brains out for watching this fucking show still.

...

I too have seen I'm Gunna Git You Sucka

>sword has capacity for 6 knives
>characters shoots tens of knives like a madman without reloading

>hur a Russian killed themselves playing Russian Roulette with a semi auto
>people believe this
IT WAS A CLICK BAIT PROPAGANDA FAKE NEWS ARTICLE YOU FUCKING RETARDS

>burden of proof

kek what are you talking about this is not a debate where burden of proof is applicable it's a Chinese cartoon image board where several people have made the same claim to something having happened, if you are too bone-idle to use google then don't be so reatarded to think you can expect people to provide sources like a university dissertation.

"tens"
tens of thousands
tens of millions

underrated

>character is surrounded by armed henchmen, most of whom have combat experience
>charge at him one at a time and then try to shoot him point blank

>character magdumps
>slide pops back when the pistol is empty

>muh timbuktu porcelain doll appreciation website
It's simple logic that one would expect you to back up your claim with at least a link to an article rather than just g-g-google it

Except it's not on a Sup Forums board where you can use google yourself quicker than you can ask for a source you colossal retard.

At the end of the day, you and your point is not valid because YOU cannot back up YOUR claims you cock

This pisses me off more then anything. We should see the character loading the gun, pumping one in the chamber and loading one more shell, Or simply putting a shell into the chamber and loading the rest.

The only time a character should pump the shotgun is after he shoots the fucking thing.

OH no, user doesn't believe me, what ever will I do.

the validity of your point goes out the window