We need Ridley Scott but we also want the reddit audience

>we need Ridley Scott but we also want the reddit audience
>i know the perfect director

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6iqmIoHL74Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

He isn't even remotely like Ridley Scott you fucking subhuman

He's also the Canadian Nolan.

Except Villeneuve has actually made good films

Are you okay OP?

Like what?

>get me fincher
>we can't afford 50 million being spent on an extra scene that will get cut
>then get me the cheaper, dumber version of fincher
>...we're right back where we started, sir

He's not Canadian, he's Québécois, they're a people from a giant reservation for entitled catholic socialists who hate the west.

Meme Runner

what's wrong with his teeth?

Memento was okay, would have been great if they'd cut the black and white sections that spell out what's happening for retards. Interstellar would have been good if he'd hired an editor to cut down the 45 minute completely boring and irrelevant dirt farm subplot. Those Batman movies were bad but they're still the best capeshit ever made, and there are many parts of them that rise to the level of competent.

What do you dorks call this? When you obviously like somebody but would never admit it? just be happy Sup Forums, he makes good movies

Either he wants desperately to shit on the movie 24/7 or he wants to stir up positive opinions of the movie to btfo the OP 24/7

Either way OP is pathetic

LE MEME

LE PICKE RICK

Literally all of his movies are good

youtube.com/watch?v=6iqmIoHL74Y

The middlebrow one that makes me feel like I have taste above capeshit

If you’re a brainlet maybe

Ridley Scott's a fucking hack. His recent movies all suck balls and he's literally the only one trying to force the Deckard is a replicant meme.
Villenueve is still going strong. He's released a movie a year since 2013 and they've all ranged from decent to great

Serious question, on a scale of 1 to 10, how royally assblasted is Ridley Scott that his best received film from the last 5 years was The Martian meanwhile the one film he decided not to direct (/wasn't allowed to direct) which was a sequel to his earlier film has been received as a modern day classic and a genuine masterpiece?

Ah, I see you are a true cinephile like me user

>Literally all of his movies are good

>we don't want any audience
>I know just the director

Go to bed Ridley

>if they'd cut the black and white sections that spell out what's happening for retards
Black & white were the events leading up to the pivotal moment. Colourised was the events AFTER the pivotal moment.

>last movie was BR2049
>last movie was A:Covenant

On what fucking planet is he a lesser version of Scott? Lmao. Scott is also 80 years old I don't want to insult the guy but common

Ridley Scott literally picked Villeneuve himself because he was busy you fucking reddit memester do your homework

P A T H E T I C
A
T
H
E
T
I
C

Probably pissed. Critical acclaim and also not making a return anytime soon. He's probably incredibly jealous of Denis and furious for the lost cash.

>Nolan is the British Villeneuve

Yes I saw the movie fucktard, the black and white is there to let dummies know what is happening because Nolan has such contempt for his audience that he didn't think the color parts alone made sense.

>(/wasn't allowed to direct
Actually he was and he was also planning a prequel, but hes too busy shitting out other stuff
>a genuine masterpiece
Explain in great detail

Danny Boyle is the British Villeneuve

Wasnt Ridley the producer? And he handpicked Denis to direct

WHAT THE FUCK IS IT WITH RIDLEY SCOTT AND PREQUELS?

The black & white parts are the events leading up to the pivotal moment. Chronologically. The colourised parts are the events after the moment, yet played in stages of reverse.

>Explain in great detail
Masterpiece, magnum opus (Latin, great work) or Chef-d'œuvre (French, master of work, plural Chefs-d'œuvre) in modern use is a creation that has been given much critical praise, especially one that is considered the greatest work of a person's career or to a work of outstanding creativity, skill, profundity, or workmanship. Historically, a "masterpiece"' was a work of a very high standard produced to obtain membership of a guild or academy in various areas of the visual arts and crafts.
The word masterpiece probably derives from the Dutch meesterstuk or German meisterstück via loan translation. The form masterstik is recorded in English or Scots in a set of Aberdeen guild regulations dated to 1579, whereas "masterpiece" is first found in 1605, already outside a guild context, in a Ben Jonson play. "Masterprize" was another early variant in English.

In English, the term rapidly became used in a variety of contexts for an exceptionally good piece of creative work, and was "in early use, often applied to man as the 'masterpiece' of God or Nature".

what movie are you talking about?

>he can't do it
Rob Ager was right about the low cinematic IQ of the BR2049 crowd.

>answers the request
>poster still gets butthurt
what did he mean by this?

It's closer to "We need a Ridley Scott that's actually made good movies in the last forty years"