Will we ever se an accurate portrayal of dinosaurs on the big screen?

Will we ever se an accurate portrayal of dinosaurs on the big screen?

Other urls found in this thread:

smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/13/6/20170092
youtube.com/watch?v=5KXzgeq1BuA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Maybe

i dont remember

why are you guys so obsessed with entertainment being "accurate", apart from the obvious autism aswer?

how do they know that wasnt' just a prehistoric bird

Fuck off featherfag, your shit doesn't exist.

>prehistoric bird
you mean a dinosaur?
Stage 1: Denial

>birdcucks
WE

Imagine if in every WW2 movie ever made, there was never a soldier wearing a helmet.

...

No I mean a prehistoric bird, they were there already
Show me a bird with the teeth of a trex

imagine being so pretentious that you believe you know the same about what happened 65 milion years ago that what happened in the last century with photographs, films and writen records

...

that's not a bird with the teeth of a trex but a trex covered in feathers wich there's no proof of it
again show me a current bird that have the teeth composition of a trex

literally the soy version of a dino

or black soldiers everywhere, imagine that!

>MUH DINOSAURS NEED TO BE FUZZY AND FEATHERY JUST LIKE MUH BIRBS AND MUH DOGGOS :333333
Only soybeaners want dinosaurs to be epic and cuddly because they can't handle raw strength and power. It's toxic masculinity for dinosaurs to not have feathers.

Looks like a big chicken

AYO HOL 'UP
[shits on you car]
U SAYIIN
[whistles gay sounds]
WE WUZ

Scalefags on suicide watch ITT

>Show me a bird with the teeth of a trex
Lots of ancient birds have teeth

>feathercucks
Today, I will remind them:
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/13/6/20170092

WHAT THE FUCK NO!

THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING

See you in a few months when us based Scalechads win again

>feathers directly behind you
Heh, nothing personal kid

>feathercuck can't read
Not surprised.

WAKE UP PEOPLE! DINOSAURS ARE NOT AND NEVER HAVE BEEN REAL! ALL "EVIDENCE" WAS FABRICATED BY THE SATANIC ORDER TO BREAK OUR FAITH IN THE ALMIGHTY!

This is why the bible was only for use by priests back in the day.

>this is what birdcucks believe
really makes me think

What did I fail to read, oh wise one?
Parts of Tyrannosaurus rex was undoubtedly scaled, but older Tyrannosaurs (like Yutyrannus) were definitely feathered, which means that more recent Tyrannosaurs are capable of having feathers since it's unlikely that Yutyrannus evolved feathers de novo but rather inherited it from a common ancestor to all Tyrannosaurs

thats actually cute you moron

what if they were just dinos then? the bones of birds can't stand a dino

Birds are cool, fuck off.

*blocks your path and ruins the reputation of a 90s documentary series*

>the current year, still believing in (((dinosaurs)))

youtube.com/watch?v=5KXzgeq1BuA

wtf how does this dinosaur have feathers

>implying the consensus wont change in few years
>implying theropods and especially dromaesauridae weren't feathered

Face it, coolest dinos had feathers
Scalefags have only lame sauropods, Americans of mezozoic era

Scalefags have all of ornithischia to all their own. Literally eaters of soy.

The entire article?
>These findings indicate “that most (if not all) large-bodied tyrannosaurids were scaly,” the authors of the study write.
>Since there is ample evidence to suggest that earlier tryannosaurs had feathers, the study’s conclusions would mean that tyrannosaurs evolved a feathery coat, only to eventually lose it. The study’s authors believe that the T. rex’s size can help explain the evolutionary shift, Bittel reports.
>T. rex were much bigger than their predecessors, having developed long legs that let them dash after prey. But large and active animals don’t cool down as quickly as smaller creatures. So as they got bigger, researchers think that the dinosaurs may have lost their plumage. “[F]eathers were too much of a hindrance to cooling off after a sprint,” Bittel writes.
>So the authors of the study offer an additional hypothesis: the Yutyrannus had feathers because it lived in shady forests, which helped the dinosaur keep its cool.
>A similar phenomenon can be seen in elephants of today, as Helen Briggs of the BBC points out. Asian elephants have more hair than African elephants not only because they are smaller, but also because they live in dense forest environments.
>Body size evolution in tyrannosauroids reveals two independent occurrences of gigantism; specifically, the large sizes in Yutyrannus and tyrannosaurids were independently derived. These new findings demonstrate that extensive feather coverings observed in some early tyrannosauroids were lost by the Albian, basal to Tyrannosauridae. This loss is unrelated to palaeoclimate but possibly tied to the evolution of gigantism, although other mechanisms exist.
Don't act all smarmy when you blatantly didn't read anything I posted.

>coolest
Last time I checked the fucking tanks of the Cretacic that were ankylosaurids didn't have feathers.

*confuses Americans*

Paleontology was a mistake.

the fact that most skeletons are fabricated is fucking sad

All birds still have the latent gene to create teeth, which sometimes happens through atavism, because they are dinosaurs. Literally from the dinosauria clad.

Nothing of what you said contradicts what I said.
Tyrannosaurus rex wasn't covered in feathers because it was large and lived in warm climates.
But it isn't categorically impossible for it to have feathery integument.
Going
>haha parts of their skin definitely had scales, feathers btfo forever, not a feather ever grew on this animal
Is just stupid.

Another lie. Satan is in you

>Little filament like feathers= full body cover of flight feathers and shit

At last I truly see.

>has feathers
>no teeth
>beak
>pygostyle
>wishbone
What am I?

>beta scalevirgin
>alpha featherchad

>literally 56% of bone armor
Like I said, Americans of mezozoic era, scalefags on extinction watch

how do we know that prehistoric people were hairy btw
how do we even know that lucy was not just a retarded or ugly human

>Tail swipes cassually
>Breaks fragile T-rex leg
>Dies of malnutrition or wound infection

Featherfags BTFO, you don't even cover the whole Saurischia clade.

>Ahmed you have to do a modern take on dinos for JP reboot
>will you use modern science to create feathered dinos
>or make a knock off Dogzilla flick

...

She probably had feathers tbqttp

>Get hired to create a story for some kids trading cards about dinosaurs attacking people
>Write a plot about an evil inter-dimensional reptilian deity trying to take over the universe through time travel

We don't actually. Considering how odd modern human hair is, it's possible that other hominids didn't quite follow our hair patterning.

Because one of the most fantastic living creatures on earth and example of Evolution at its finest, is portrayed as an ugly naked lizard.

wouldn't know

abo qt :)

>imagine being so pretentious that you believe you know the same about what happened 65 milion years ago
Are...are you actually retarded?

...

>there were no black American or French soldiers
>Africa was not literally a theater of the war

yo, while we're on the subject - what the fuck is up with platypus? not a bird, not a rodent. lactates milk through skin, is poisonous.
what the fuck is his deal?

>Trump made anime real
>Jurassic Park is next
Fucking hell

>always look back on the walking with series as beautiful kino
>read something about another walking with dinosaurs
>see that
what the fuck


Planet Dinosaur (2011) is a good newer cgi dino documentary.

>modern humans
>3 million years ago
Impossible.

North Africa.
So Arabs and Berbers.
Not WE WUZ

I like how you ignored how America had an entire African American unit, as well as France. I also like "well, it may have been in Africa, but they weren't blacky black Africans".

>There are "people" who unironically believe this

>literally a few hundred thousand African Americans fought in the war

CALL ME AN APE WILL YA

Literally Plebbit: the animal

Not really sure what the problem is with them.

>He says this while believing dinosaurs were puny /fa/ggots

>I like how you ignored how America had an entire African American unit, as well as France. I also like "well, it may have been in Africa, but they weren't blacky black Africans".
well he said black from the start, not african

>"well, it may have been in Africa, but they weren't blacky black Africans".
Yeah?
I mean that's literally the truth. African Americans are descended from sub-Saharan West Africans.
No one calls Egyptians or Tunisians or Algerians "black"

People actually believe dinosaurs existed?

>only sub-saharans are physically black or black people
I love this Sup Forums meme, as if Africa is just the Sahara or Egypt. You're dumb, mate.

Imagine being this much of a moron. Fuck you and fuck your feathers.

...

>No one calls Egyptians or Tunisians or Algerians "black"

Sweetie...

Right, and that's still wrong.

Give me proof that they didn't.

So headlines usually always lie. Was it a real Dino? And not just an ancient bird? How old is it?

I'm sorry you're mentally ill.

>Implying the platypus is not /ourpet/

>Was it a real Dino? And not just an ancient bird?
user...

...

how can scalecucks ever recover???

Burden of proof is on you, fake skeletons fabricated in a museum isn't proof btw.

...

99 million years old.

Spinosaurus justfuckmyshitupiccus

...

Hand positioning is all wrong

Fake News

>literally thousands upon thousands of authentic fossils, genetic evidence, leftover DNA evidence, real world descendents still alive and over 100 years of research and data

>dinosaurs

literally the niggers of flightless birds

>real world descendents still alive

WE

...

...