"The deal will see the Murdoch family become the largest stackholders in Disney and James Murdoch becoming the CEO in...

>"The deal will see the Murdoch family become the largest stackholders in Disney and James Murdoch becoming the CEO in 2019 when Bob Iger retires"

Say something nice about Disney's new owners.

Other urls found in this thread:

aei.org/publication/thomas-sowell-on-the-trickle-down-myth-workers-are-always-paid-first-and-then-profits-flow-upward-later-if-at-all/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Why won't he just die already?

They're nominally conservative, and might get rid of the forced diversity pandering.

Murdoch and his son are both right wing as fuck, Murdoch owns several UK newspapers which regularly make articles against Muslims and immigration.

BAsed

>one insanely rich unsupervised jew with fuck knows what kind of agenda on his mind in exchange for another insanely rich unsupervised jew with fuck knows what kind of agenda on his mind
I for one am thrilled for the prospect of having wonderful Mr James Murdoch as the CEO of The Walt Disney Company my favorite provider of multimedia entertainment

I never got the feeling that Disney was heavily marketing diversity because politics and a misguided sense of justice, just cold hard money because that's what the kids are into.

Murdoch in charge of Foxnews and ABC news.

I just read the article and you completely made that up

>Disney, arguably the most influential company in the world now, will be ran and operated by a shit posting Australian

Someone opened the meme magic portals again!

>stackholder

It's either "stakeholder" or "stockholder" you retard. Not some combo of the two.

They're not going to call any of the shots. If anything, this means that the Murdochs will be able to focus more on Fox News and they'll be flush with cash to spend on their global news empire. But I doubt they will exert any creative control over Disney after they sign away their entertainment properties. Disney would never let them do that.

Disney will become right wing?!

So it's less Fox being consumed by Disney as it is Disney getting consumed by Fox?

>Murdoch
>Right wing

No.

Can someone tell me why according to 90% of the internet, I am supposed to hate rich people?

im pretty sure it would be disney buying fox.......

Because unlike poor people, rich people don't pay their taxes and they get away with it.

Because they hate you, they really do.

cause they would pay to take your dignity if they were allowed to

because they brainwash people into believing lies such as equality

Extremely wealthy people also disproportionately hoard resources for their own benefit and more often than not setup "charities" as a legal money laundering schemes among other things.

Maybe compared to fucking Pinochet but by centrist standards he is on the right.

I agree tax loopholes are BS, but they have the highest tax rates.

I think you guys are being overly dramatic. People are rich because they makes products and services people want to buy en masse. And honestly it makes no sense to hate rich people and still be happy about all the movies and tv shows that come from big, wealthy companies.

>but they have the highest tax rates.
Because they can afford them.

Cuckservatives love diversity.

Stop thinking companies are run by rulers with petty calls. They just ask the people doing things "is it making money?" "yes" "then continue whatever the hell you are doing". This goes for every ideology or sense of opinion, money is the only thing that talks

Because since the 1980s they've done everything they can to gain a greater proportion of the national wealth without enriching their employees so that the middle class is on the verge of collapse.

They've been robber-barons, basically, while promising a trickle down in wealth that has never occurred.

Depends on the rich people. The ones who call for open immigration and no borders are the greatest enemy mankind has ever faced.

Those that are rich and either use their influence for actual good while staying out of politics, or to preserve the past, shouldn't be hated.

>They've been robber-barons, basically, while promising a trickle down in wealth that has never occurred.
That's because "trickle-down" is a meme invented by leftists.

Lower tax rates on the rich are supposed to increase aggregate output and demand. No one suggested that lowering taxes means money from the rich goes to the poor in a "trickle down" manner.

aei.org/publication/thomas-sowell-on-the-trickle-down-myth-workers-are-always-paid-first-and-then-profits-flow-upward-later-if-at-all/

Jesus was a Jew.

t.Jew

he was just the first self loathing jew

>"If you work hard, then you should give up your wealth!"

By your logic in thinking, basically if I take the risk to open a fruit and veggie shop, face years of fiscal instability and basically living-to-work, and then one day when I can afford to hire on a worker, I should pay the worker as much profit out of the business as I receive?

Fuck off you communist.

If you're not rich and want to build somewhat of a respectable life, you become a wageslave. Wages are controlled by the rich. Your wage is barely a nickel compared to their wages and they keep it that way because fuck you. They could easily double your wage but that'd mean taking a hit to their own wage. They wouldn't be able to buy their 50th mansion while you shit in a box because your toilet got clogged and you can't afford a plumber.

>foxgrapes.png

and black people are cheaper to hire

>you become a wageslave.
Nice /r9k/ meme.
>Wages are controlled by the rich. Your wage is barely a nickel compared to their wages and they keep it that way because fuck you. They could easily double your wage but that'd mean taking a hit to their own wage

Maybe learn how economics work. Obviously a worker's wages are gonna be lower because A. The boss takes more risk since he, you know, runs the company and B. He is paying multiple workers.

Seriously you socialists need to realize economics comes down to scarcity of resources. Stop trying to make this some dramatic battle of evil rich guy vs good poor guy.

>Double everyone's wages
>Suddenly the company has no liquidity because businesses don't keep stockpiles of gold coins and bank notes laying around like Scrooge or some shit
>Have to start charging more for products because suddenly the manufacturing process is absolutely killing the profitability of the business
>Service sector met with the same problem, accountants are now charging twice for private taxation services than their competitors
>Competitors who stick to tried and true market thrive
>"Innovative" communist businesses burn and crash because the general public aren't going to pay twice as much for one of two comparable products because human beings care only for themselves and their families
>Business goes bankrupt
>All those workers are now out of a job, but they earned double that of their peers for 2 months!

Communism, YES!

It's not socialism, retard. You can still have capitalism while having better wages for wageslaves. Socialism/communism means everyone would get the same amount of wealth, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying wageslaves could get higher wages while the rich people would get a cut to their pay that they probably won't even notice to begin with.

If Richy McRichDick has 200 cookies and wageslaves have 1. Do you really think Richy is going to miss one cookie?

They have more money than me, I pray for their deaths and their children to be raped.

He will because Richy is a fucking kike and every cookie counts goy.

>nation built buy immigrants hates immigrants

Only the ones who want you dead and will dissolve your race to do so.

He was rejected by the jews for being Christ.

diversity makes money though

if Jesus was a jew then how did he invent christian? which is the opposite of being a Jew, think before you fucking post moron.

protip: murdoch's are not jews, even if they're rich and successful

A nation built strictly by white Europeans wants to stay white European.

Imagine that

Yeah, it's funny that people think that Disney has any other values besides making as much money they can. Like most corporations they're only interested in making money and if making it requires them to pander SJW or start making anti-Muslim stuff, they'll do it.

Disney has a lot of people whose only function is to sniff out what is in the air and what will be the next big thing. After they are clear on that, they'll move to that.

That was show when they made their last theatrical 2D animation, The Princess and the Frog, after which they haven't done an another, as despite people were asking for a traditional animation, it made only 260 million WW.

>rich people who support what I support are good
>rich people who support what I do not support are BAD

You are literally what's wrong with the world.

>AEI

Like asking the head of Ultraorthodox Judaism to give an honest, unbiased assessment on the two-state solution.

Then why import black african people?

UNLIMITED POWER

he won't get it without selling fox news

I think a private person can own as much as possible, without any regulation.

>built strictly by white Europeans
kek

>buy thousands of niggers as slaves
ok bud

lel

how much can trump actually do

Is Murdoch /OurBillionaire/?

Disney did the same thing when they bought Pixar. Steve Jobs ended up as the largest Disney shareholder and John Lasseter was put in charge of all animation.

the Murdoch's are not even a tiny bit Jewish you insanely gullible, poser right winger faggot
he's been your faggot personal sponsor since 2016 idiot, he pimps Dear Leader on his network

>That was show when they made their last theatrical 2D animation, The Princess and the Frog, after which they haven't done an another, as despite people were asking for a traditional animation, it made only 260 million WW.
They did though. And it made even less money than P&tF

>implying
He's trying to buy up Sky right now, and there's no sale of Fox News going on

That's not how it work, dear.

You are the Faker.

>hands rubbing furiously

is it good or bad

This will change the culture of america to conservative

And when Iger retires in 2019 he'll announce that he's running for President and then we'll all be well and truly fucked.

Pooh was a dirt cheap movie compared to PATF. No lengthy pre-production phase, deliberately went for the sketchier Xerox look of the old shorts, and only cost like 30 million dollars.

>This will change the culture of america to conservative

Conservatism has no culture

Bait not falling for it

Marvel Comics says hi

They're economic/pro-business conservatives, but socially moderate-to-liberal. They're not going to stop anything.

Isn't Fox News the right-wing propaganda medium?
Or is it a meme?

I saw CNN cut off the video feed off of a guest that wasnt agreeing with them, on the day of the election fox had a outspoken liberal on and when the liberal started getting agressive they TALKED about the subject

america was built by black and chinese immigrants. white europeans just leeched off of the work of better people as usual.

No it was designed by the educated and put together by the uneducated just like an engineer and construction workers

Not really. Fox News is mostly a tool of the establishment right to keep the rank and file in line.

Their #1 anchor is the openly gay Shepard Smith, and they've got other people like Dana Perino pushing the idea that the GOP needs to be more inclusive and embrace diversity as well.

The main authentically right-wing organ these days is probably Breitbart (if you overlook their heavy pro-Israel bias).

>so this is the power of capitalism

Monopolies are the natural end point of capitalist economies. People with capital almost always act to accumulate more capital. And when that wealth also provides them with power and influence who the fuck is going to stop them?