Frank Cho's Latest Art

Frank Cho is my husbando

Other urls found in this thread:

bleedingcool.com/2017/04/24/jeremy-whitley-responds-frank-chos-unstoppable-wasp-blank-sketch-variant/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Nadia's butt is cute! CUTE!

So he's just trolling the shit out of the industry with these? I need more examples of this.

By "this" I of course mean defiance of industry trends, not these covers.

Though more covers would be nice too.

That's Janet.

>Cho isn't aware that Nadia isn't Janet
>because Cho doesn't read comics
>Sup Forums defends this because he's "fighting" "against" our favorite boogeypersons
Wew.

>Jeremy Whitley is a virtue signalling faggot who says Cho is 'behind the times'
who'd have fucking guessed

>guy who works in comics doesn't care about comics
wut

>muh Eisner nomination
Cho's effect as an artist on the comic book community will be felt generations after this nobody has faded into obscurity.

Bash cho for being old stuff, then bashes cho for not knowing comics.

Weird.

Maybe he and Rob can gang up Cho in a dark alley one day for exploitating their daughter-fus

Theyre all wrong.

Wait, how is it Marvel's fault Cho drew what Cho draws?

Cho may have intended it be Jan, but with Nadia's suit and her hair it's effectively Nadia. Especially when my dick would rather it be Nadia.

>because Cho doesn't read comics
>implying not knowing one year old legacy character who exists simultaneously with the original is a big deal
Would you say Priest doesn't read comics because he had to clarify that Deathstroke hadn't been replaced with a black guy before he accepted the job writing him?

last one for now but damn

I don't care who he thinks it is. It pissed off virtue signaling faggots, and its an incredible piece of art. If you catch my drift.

Nadia might as well be Janet's clone. Not like anyone can tell them apart anyway.

...

Priest actually doesn't read comics.

your husbando a shilord

He's been doing the same sort of combination of ass and snark for the past 30 some years.

Perhaps the comissioner wanted Jan in Nadia's costume? Perhaps Cho balked a little at drawing 14 year old ass?

Modern eisner nomination means squirrel girl to me. Pic related is the comic he's crowing about. I actually sort of like it, but there's no fucking way I would consider it for multiple nominations the way it got.

Marvel isn't blacklisting him the way some of the bitches and whiners would like.

Credit where credit's due. At least he didn't go full navy seals copypasta like the spider gwen guy.

>he's playing to a diminishing base
Funnily enough I imagine Cho will still be getting commissions and published work long after whoever that is gets his book canceled.

I don't know if that comic is satire or what, but fair also means "beautiful". Literally.

HOLY SHIT, Mark Waid just almost redeemed himself in my eyes, I expected he would be hardcore against cheesecake.

What libel is this?

>Reading Unbeatable Wasp.

If you non ironically like that garbage you should consider offing yourself.

>and her hair

Which isn't that much different from Jan's.

Is that why Marvel's progressiveness is losing readers?

Last I saw Jan still had the pixie. When did she get a bob?

He's fucking shit and needs to stop, or at least try to do something a bit different. But I suppose that's too risky and he'll just keep on shitting out cheesecake and taking that T & A money. Good Girl art without any of the charm or sense of fun. I can't think of a comic artist with less self-awareness.

Isn't that Ultimate Janet?

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAP

>hey guys look at these cucks, amirite?
>based cho XD

Jesus Christ you're a faggot

I know Whitley, he is a good guy. That being said all the new writer/artists in comic industry need to relax and learn to take a joke and not be so uptight about making every little thing a PC issue.

>Whitley is basically whatever about it. Frank Cho gonna Cho
>People keep trying to prod him into anger

what the hell

Does anyone even get offended by Cho's art anymore save for Rucka?

...

You could sum up all of Marvel and DC editorial with that phrase.

see

I assume they're doing it because he's being condescending, implying artists like Cho and their fans are outdated boors possessed of an inferior mindset.

That seems too tame to be actual libel.

It mentions BC. Maybe they called him a pedo when they were clickbaiting over this?

He's talking about Jude Terror and BC not Whitley:

bleedingcool.com/2017/04/24/jeremy-whitley-responds-frank-chos-unstoppable-wasp-blank-sketch-variant/

What is "bleah"?

What does it say?

Why is this Jeremy guy even mad it's not even his character.

He literally created IP for Disney and his only job is writing a few stories before he's replaced. Where is all this pride for his waifu even coming from?

Practically nothing, just screenshots of Whitley's twitter comments and the author adding in some self-fellating captions.

Post the captions.

He didn't even create her, that was Waid.

>It's Mark Waid's character to begin with
>He's not even mad and is totally bro with Cho about it
kek

>who could give two shits about comics
Why do Americans do this and think this is a sentence that makes sense? He COULDN'T give a shit, c'mon.

>I know Whitley, he is a good guy
No, he's a nu-male.

Only because you asked so nicely.

>On Saturday, Bleeding Cool published a report telling you about Frank Cho’s latest blank sketch variant, apparently depicting The Unstoppable Wasp, otherwise known as teenage superhero Nadia Pym, with Luke Cage and Iron Fist ogling her butt. After Bleeding Cool published the article, Cho updated his Facebook post to say that the character was meant to be Janet Van Dyne, the original Wasp.

[Screens of Cho's fb post]

>Nevertheless, Unstoppable Wasp writer Jeremy Whitley commented on Twitter:

[Screens of Whitley's twitter]

>Well, that’s putting it bluntly. A helpful and reportedly very handsome person pointed out that it wasn’t technically in the *original* post that Cho labeled it as Janet, to which he replied:

[Screens of author's twitter exchange with Whitley]

>In the end…

[Superfluous twitter screens]

>Just Luke Cage talking about butts…

If you ask me to post the screens you can go fuck yourself, I don't even know why I did this much.

>yfw he draws an adult Moon Girl variant

Calm your autism you unpleasent prick.

Okay, just going to ask. Does Cho do spanking pics? His fixation on the booty would support the notion he'd be into it and my dick can barely process the imagery of him drawing one out

I like Rich The Leech is so good at triggering the manbabies of the comic book industry,

couldn't give two shits about comics eh?

To be fair I imagine he doesn't actually care about Janet's replacement.

...

This, whenever I see posts with twitter screencaps I can't help but think the user who posted it is either a teenage girl or just a bitchboy.

t. cuck

It wasn't Rich who wrote the article, though, it was Jude

It is getting kinda tiring with the Cho crap. Can't he just get back to drawing hot ass bitches without trying to deliberately piss people off at the same time. The first 10 times was kinda funny, but now we're on the 15th drawing telling the same joke?

>I don't even know why I did this much
Because you're a bitch, now post the screens.

He wasn't even trying to piss anybody off. It was just a bit of cheesecake with a little joke, no Outrage Gwen or backhanded dialogue or anything.

Sorry, I might be a bitch but I'm a lazy bitch. That's way too much work.

I'm pretty sure that's just a made up persona.

I'm not sure which salt is tastier, the stuff coming from the people Cho is pissing off on twitter on the people he's pissing off on Sup Forums.

Yeah, sure there was no Outrage Qwen because there doesn't need to be one now. All his work has become boringly uniform. There's usually some character in the bottom corner of the page, saying something snooty, the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut, and then he pretends that he hasn't already purposefully done this to irk people.

If that's what he wants to be known for then that's his business. It's just really hurting his appeal to be able to draw in other books. I'd rather he ramp down his innocent act and just embrace what he's doing or shut up about it.

Plus, I'd really like to see him work on other stuff rather than just drawing dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time.

Well, Sup Forums can make long autistic rants about how triggered they are: . Whereas Twitter only allows a given number of characters.

>the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut

How can you tell? There is no change within the size or cranium nor any convenient transparency.

>the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut
Because stupid women don't exist, right?

I like Cho's art, but these jokes are terrible. Nobody says "Damn my wide child bearing hips."

To be fair, this is just cheesecake. I still like the guy, yet Artist like Adam Hughs at least change up the themes of their sexy art. It's not just the same scenario rinse and repeated.

her hips are through the vent though.
her thighs are what are stuck

Cho has one big advantage over Adam Hughes, which is that Hughes cannot draw hips for shit.

He prefers a different body type. I think Ryan Ottley and Cho draw the best babes.

Cho should draw a aged up version of that princess charcther that guy drew as a coked out whore

Ok, commission the drawing. I'd love to see it.

Jeremy Whitley's art isn't as good as Cho's.

Whitley knows this in his heart of hearts and the only thing he chooses to do about it is rage.

Envy is a terrible thing.

>Jeremy Whitley's art isn't as good as Cho's.

I don't know about that. It depends on what you're looking for. I mean, Cho's art just doesn't lend itself well to serious storytelling. It would be a hilarious thing to see him draw "The Boys" by Garth Ennis. Cause suddenly all the impact of the emotional scenes would be taken away because of how distracting his art can be when it comes to telling grimdark stories, his art just doesn't lend itself well to certain types of storytelling.

If you wanna have a wank, then Cho's your man.

hoo boy

...

I think I hear your wife's son calling, better get on that.

...

...

Those ladies are looking kinda Frank.

I was under the impression Whitley was just a writer.

Damn that fantastic four chic is thicc as fucc

>check his bibliography
>he wrote My Little Pony books

There's no Outrage Gwen because that phase is over and he's gone back to making his sketches the way he's done since forever. He's not pretending that he isn't doing this to irk people, he just isn't doing it to irk people. It's just another variant cover that he does on the side for fun, complete with cheesecake and a little joke. If Cho was trying to irk people, you would know, because the cover would be taking shots at those people. Like with the Harley Quinn cover or the Power Girl one.

It's also funny that you think that these little side bits are what Cho is largely known for in the industry. The guy has won multiple awards and is the creator and owner of multiple published award winning works. Trust me, he doesn't have to worry about his appeal.

YOU only know him as this guy who draws silly little cheesecake sketches because your investment in comics and art begins and ends with whatever social media you follow, like the threads on Sup Forums. You probably spend more time bitching about comics than you do actually reading them.

If you actually knew anything more about his work, then you would know that he doesn't just do "dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time". Fuck if you even followed comics or bothered to read the storytimes on this board you would have seen his art in Totally Awesome Hulk, which wasn't all cheesecake and had impressive depictions of monsters.

In another, better, universe Frank Cho uses his skills to draw full porn.

>evolving

If "evolving" means giving up liking fat asses then I don't wanna evolve

Is he saying that blacks are less evolved than whites? I feel like we can use this.

What a horrible lines and art

I'm here on Sup Forums, so I know who Frank Cho is in all his glory and flaws. I even have some work of his signed by him. If you can't criticize an artist just because you like their work, then that's your issue not mine. I'm certainly not losing any sleep over it. He trolls people. That's pretty much what he's been doing since he found out that it's lucrative to piss people off.

Not only does making people mad increase your sales but it also makes your work more known to others. Being that he's so well rounded, he's at that point in his career where he can take chances like this.

>If you actually knew anything more about his work, then you would know that he doesn't just do "dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time". Fuck if you even followed comics or bothered to read the storytimes on this board you would have seen his art in Totally Awesome Hulk, which wasn't all cheesecake and had impressive depictions of monsters.

I liked Lady Hellbender as I thought it was a very cool design. Had you been listening to what I said in whatever retort I gave. I basically said, that his art doesn't lend itself to certain kinds of stories. At least when he's hired to do a book you'll notice that it's usually to draw a story that speaks to his strengths as an artist.

Take Totally Awesome Hulk for instance... he draw anatomy pretty well. Hulk half-naked half the time. He draws monster pretty good, that story is full of monsters.

If you're trying to checkmate me, it's not going to work because I ain't even mad at your passion.

thanks

That's not at all what he said in fact it's literally impossible to even come to that conclusion unless you already had the thought in your head or were (obviously) trying to frame him, but feel free to use it, I'm sure it won't make you look like you're projecting.

Hughes can't draw hips and ASS

>he pretends that he hasn't already purposefully done this to irk people.

Really?
Citation needed

I think jealous or envy for me

>fantasthicc.