Looking for specific male sexualization in comics (Read everything before commenting)

Does there exist ANY officially published colored comic you can purchase a physical copy of out there with the following criterias:

* Male gay inclusion.

* Showing off any of the males' butt in a sexy outfit revealing skin on their legs and buttcheeks (similarly to how they usually do with female characters in comics). And it doesn't count if it's depicted for the sake of comedy - it has to be intentionally sexy.

Preferrably NOT porn. And I don't want something with just one of the criterias, but ALL of what I describe to fit.

Consider it a challenge. See if you can prove me wrong on this not existing.

no. quit being a fag

>VentoAureo.jpg

Mike.

Hand me the batteries.

Bigby Wolf gets a very brief (~4 panels) nude scene in Fabels Volume 3: Storybook Love. It's not played for laughs, he's just a wild wolf man enjoying the wilderness as his waifu sleeps in for the morning. You see his full ass.

I said "male gay inclusion", and that the male needs to specifically be sexualized in the ways I described. Learn to read. Being nude isn't in itself sexualization - being nude is just being nude.

Virtually anything by Fred Perry

JoJo "sexualizes" males for laughs and has no proper male gay inclusion and is a manga NOT in color aside from covers, so it doesn't count.

He only sexualizes FEMALES. I asked for MALE sexualization in these specific ways. Learn to read.

Fuck off, autist.

Go ask in where it's actually relevant.

I clearly said I'm not looking for porn, idiot.

>JoJo "sexualizes" males for laughs

are you out of your goddam mind

every single fucking male character is fabulous as fuck

>for laughs
what, no. The fanbase finds it funny but the creator doesn't do it for laughs. He's just really into fashion.

Doesn't matter, it has no proper male gay inclusion either way, and it's still not colored.

No, you're just having another go at making your last garbage thread so you can shitpost all over it.

You make a retardedly specific request, lure in people just trying to help out and then you get a blank check to shit all over them for DARING to not know the hyper specific thing you asked for. Just fuck off already.

>getting Sup Forums to do research for your medium/Mary Sue article
heh

are you implying that Dio is not gay for Jonathan

Gay subtext is NOT proper male gay inclusion.

the females are so masculine that it might as well be gay.

>no proper gay male inclusion
Who is Enrico Pucci?

Masculine females have nothing to do with male homosexuality, you fucking idiot.

>all art is subjective
>comics are art
>manga are technically comics
>jjba is a manga
>meaning it is art
>therefore it is subjective
>meaning in the context of araki's work one could infer that masculine women could be connected to homosexuality and not be incorrect
Huh...

Why the butt? Males are generally sexualized by showing them shirtless and showing off their washboard abs.

Because a lot of us gay and bi guys, plus a lot of straight and bi girls - contrary to belief - find male butts sexy. I didn't make this thread to be asked dumb pointless questions.

Who are Tiziano and Squalo?

>This thread, again.
>Asking for man buttcheeks while not nude, again, when people tend to prefer latex or tight pants on manbutt.

This is your final (You), use it wisely.

Most shots of manbutt are in tight clothes to accentuate it regardless of whether it's innocuous or porn. Nobody draws half covered butts because male underwear grips the butt or is completely loose while girl underwear tends to ride high. It's also even less practical than on a woman because male hips tend to be less well defined, their butts flatter, and anything with a high-riding design has to compensate for the dick and balls.

Male butts are often not flat, don't fucking lie. And there are man-thongs with a socket for your dick and balls, idiot.

They're not in your post... i mean... they aren't from parte five... they aren't from Jojo... they don't even have stands...

>Dear Buzzfeed
>For this column I went to that dreaded site known as Sup Forums
>I made a simple request to try and gauge how prevalent the male posterior is in the comic book medium
>Instead they just called me austistic and talked about anime

>Male butts are often not flat, don't fucking lie.
Not what I said.
>And there are man-thongs with a socket for your dick and balls, idiot.
That has nothing to do with what I said.

(You)'re clearly (You) fishing, so here (You) go.
(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)

Whew, OP. (You) really wanted some (You)'s didn't (You)? I mean, why else would (You) make such a stupid thread? Well, (You) don't deserve them, but I'll throw (You) a bone anyway. I hope (You) don't make another thread like this in the future, but knowing (You) it'll only be a matter of time.

Doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results is one of the clearer signs of insanity or strong mental deficiencies.

Making this thread again for instance.

(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)

(OP) #
(You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)

Want to know how I know you're a woman?

This is why you don't indulge an SJW, because they have literal double-think to dismiss anything that challenges their religion.

A lot of it was written in Japan in the 80's-90's- nobody would fucking include the gays, but it has some incredibly homoerotic overtones throughout.

...

Catman in Secret Six is Gail Simone's husbando. Lots of man candy there. Also, I think he does some shit with dudes in New 52, but I haven't read New 52 Secret Six.

Fuck off with your weird copy pasta dude.

I said male gay inclusion. And he isn't sexualized in my described ways at all.

>Perry only sexualizes females

Oh wow, we got an idiot here.

A fucking idiot.

>I didn't make this thread to be asked dumb pointless questions.
A bit hostile, aintcha?

If your criteria is so specific, why not make your own comic? It's a fact that most comics creators are straight men who aren't attracted to other men.

Not to mention you can't sexualize a man in the same way you do a woman and expect it to still be sexy.
Men's legs and butts are generally not considered as attractive as their arms and chests.
t. bisexual

Nightwing

this thread

You've made this thread before.

Deadpool has all of those and I never noticed until now

How about midnighter

...

Oh geeze you know nothing.

Fred Perry draws two kinds of characters:
Mildly sexy.
Extremely Sexy.
This applies to both genders. Hell, there is an entire species whose males are perfect slabs of man-meat and completely naked, and also pure and innocent to a T. They are also MLP expies.

If there's no material for such market (gay male (((inclusion)))) it means that the target audience is; too small or too poor to pay attention to it.

If you think there's no material of it, save some money, write some story and hire an artist that is willing to do your story. Otherwise stop shoving your sick preferences to others, please.

Deadpool. Or Gravity Kid and Powerboy are a gay couple who wear pretty silly skimpy outfits.

Grant Morrison's The Invisibles. Specifically the character of Lord Fanny.

Found 'em. This image is SFW because they are all in *costumes* to go to a Halloween party. At a Sorority. Again: pure, innocent men.

>* Male gay inclusion.

>* Showing off any of the males' butt in a sexy outfit revealing skin on their legs and buttcheeks (similarly to how they usually do with female characters in comics).

I don't think you read comic books if you think the big 2 have done this since the 90s. Fetishwear approximating your OP image was primarily 1984-1995 and as social trends changed so did costumes.

No seriously, exposed buttcheeks in a cape costume?

If this is for coursework of yours, you need to be clear in your paper that your familiarity with the source material is weak. And no, other peoples' essays and blogposts don't count.

I'm not mad but I am disappointed that you'd need this information if you weren't already cognizant of the material and the disturbing idea that you could go on to paint yourself as some kind of knowledgeable person on the subject.

nobody would fucking include the gays,

the entire plot of devilman is centered on homolust and that from 1972

Dat Asuka.

Yo op you still here?

Femmy guys can have sexy legs and butts. Idiot.

Fred Perry draws really ugly beefcake dudes. I'm a gay dude, even I think his females are more attractive than his males. They just look retardedly deformed.

That's not what I specifically asked for.

Lord Fanny is from what I've been told a transgender woman, so that one doesn't count.

That idiot artist has something against male butts and make them all super-masculine and super-muscular, so it doesn't count.

They never show off a male butt in a thong with them bending over. So, come up with another lie, bitch.

You have a really endearing way of ignoring advice and calling everybody idiots. Really makes people want to help you find your scantily-clad-twink-but-not-porn comics.

These comics don't exist bro. You're looking for the 90's female bikini warrior aesthetic applied to guys. Nobody did that and nobody is doing it today.

You missed the point, show a modern superheroine costume that exposes buttcheeks before you get all pissy about an imagined trope of yours.

I commend you for making such a well-thought out bait post.

But anyways, lemme play along:

1. Male and female fashion is different. While some things (e.g. butts) are similarly attractive to both genders, other things are sexual in quite different ways. That's why when men are sexualized in the exact same way as women, it's done for comedy: because it looks ridiculous. You can sexualize men, but it's done differently than when you sexualize women.

You could stage an easy experiment. Go outside when it's hot, and note how many women show off their butts and thighs, and how many men do that. Men who wear shorts don't usually accentuate the thighs, and men also don't often wear butt-hugging leggings. So this difference in sex appeal isn't some fantasy invented by comic artists, it's based on real life choices made by men and women who want to look attractive.

2. What does male gay inclusion have to do with your second point or picture? There aren't many print comics with male OR female gay inclusion, altogether. Most comics with sexualized female characters don't have lesbian inclusion, either. This point turns what could have been a fair challenge, into an overly specific intentionally unwinnable request.

3. Men have been sexualized in print comic books. Not as often as women, but still they have been. If you just wanted to read a comic with some sexy beefcake in it, I could point you to some choice examples. But you aren't really interested in man ass. You want to make some sort of point. But what would that point be? You're telling us to "prove you wrong", but what about? That a comic that sexualizes a man in a very specific and unusual fashion, and also features gay male characters which is already a rarity in print comics, doesn't exist? It doesn't. But why should it exist? What implications does its nonexistence have?

[cont.]

I think you're looking for Grayson and Midnighter comics.

This whole fucking thread and only one person posts the right answer

[cont.]

If your point is that it would be a cool thing if such a comic existed, well, all the power to you! You can make it exist, at least in two different ways:
a) create it yourself;
b) or commission it.
To make it at least cost-effective in print, however, you'd have to have a market for it. You would have to do extensive social media work, as well as get some funding by using sites like Patreon and Kickstarter/Indiegogo. It could still flop, but at least you would try.

Somehow, though, I doubt that this is your intention. I suspect (correct me if I'm wrong), that the whole reason you concocted this very specific criteria for a challenge, was to make a certain point. And that point wasn't about how cool would it be to have a comic like that. No, I think the point you wanted to make is that comics that feature sexualized female characters shouldn't exist. Why do I think so? Because I've seen a lot of similar posts using similar challenges or arguments, that all tried to prove that same point. That comics with sexualized female characters should not exist.

Here's the deal though. Your challenge doesn't prove that. In fact, it proves nothing. It proves that a very specific type of comic doesn't currently exist on the print market. That most likely just means that there is no market for it. With some level of assumption, though, it might even mean that maybe some comic industry execs are homophobic. But even so, it still doesn't mean that comics with female sexualized characters shouldn't exist just because your imaginary comic doesn't.

There are lots of great artists out there who can draw sexy men. Go and support them. Have fun. Stop trying to shit on other people's fun, 'kay?

P.S.: Have some Devlin Vaugh

>I'm a turbo faggot who needs to jack off his faggot dick, go fetch me this awfully specific thing
Go fuck like a woman or something you fucking queer.

Any comic by Frank Cho, to just give one example.

"Blah blah blah, I got no actual answer for you so let me lecture you about bullshit, blah blah blah."

I never questioned the norm, idiot. I asked for any exceptions from the norm. But that's apparently too much for your thick retarded skull to comprehend.

Wait OP is a gay/bi guy? Wut
Why do you care about how female superheroines are portrayed then? How is that relevant?

Sorry user, but gotta side with OP here, a lot of women and gays tend to find male butts sexy. I'm not sure what's with OP's obsession with zettai ryouiki (aka naked thigh), but butts are a universal sexy body part.

They are never sexualized in the ways I described. And Dick Grayson isn't gay.

No need for ad hominems, OP. If you actually read my post, I explained why an actual answer to your request doesn't exist.

You didn't ask for an exception of the norm. You asked for a very specific type of male sexualization with unnecessarily complicated criteria, and then asked us to "prove you wrong". My post was an explanation as to why there's no point in "proving you wrong".

There's that comic book about the gay superhero team with a literal bear and a guy that's so gay he shits rainbows as he flies. I can't remember the name of it though.

It's not complicated. It's really simple, it's you making it complicated because you're dumb but want to be pretentious about being dumb.

Here's what you can't get.

Frank Cho and the like cater to the mainstream. A lot of straight guys read comics, and many of them like looking at pictures of sexy ladies. It's a large market.

Conversely, if male sexualization happens in comics, it usually caters to the straight female mainstream. So, you can get your share of sexualized men – sexualized in the way female readers might like.

Your example, however, doesn't fit into the mainstream. So you'd have to wait until a comic creator who likes the exact same thing makes a comic to suit their own tastes.

Not what I asked for.

Translation: "Me and the other ones here suck ass at looking for it, therefor it doesn't exist."

JoJo's Bizarre Adventure

>Male gay inclusion.
Sorbet and Geleto are gay

Dio and Scarlet Valentine are bisexual

>Showing off any of the males' butt in a sexy outfit revealing skin on their legs and buttcheeks (similarly to how they usually do with female characters in comics). And it doesn't count if it's depicted for the sake of comedy - it has to be intentionally sexy.
This happens regularly. Male sexuality / male sex appeal is constantly flaunted in JoJo.

Reiterate what you are looking for OP. Here's what I've gathered so far:

> Twinks, not beefcake
> Mankinis and ass-windows, bulging dicks
> Flaming gay characters
> Action and mystery, sci fi, whatever: real comic book stories told with twinks that bend over now and then
> Importantly it's not all about them being gay

These books don't exist, OP. They would not be a commercial success. Nobody wants to make them. Go and commission some gay art or just google it.

It's complicated because you want a mainstream comic that would apply a female sexualization aesthetic to a gay male character. There's no reason anyone would ever do something like that.

Why would it exist? and are right, there's literally no market for something as specific as that

How do you know when I didn't even give you the name of the book?

>th-that's done for c-comedy! h-ha ha ha... ha...

None of the things you describe fit into it, other than there being male gay inclusion.

They are mangas. In black and white. Also, it's from Japan, so the supposed "gay inclusion" is nothing but subtext.

>tfw that last one is impossible
i just want to read a fucking story that has gay dudes fucking not some shitty overcoming adversity bullshit. Why is that so hard?

I literally said I'm not looking for porn, shmuck.

Just because that's all I remember doesn't mean that's all there is.

There are many official published color volumes of JoJo, it's not just covers

>Also, it's from Japan, so the supposed "gay inclusion" is nothing but subtext.
Japan has buckets of comics about gay and trans people, the community there is massive you racist cunt.

The reason why gay relationships aren't explored more blatantly in JoJo is because it's not hugely relevant to the plot. The creator himself has confirmed characters being gay and bisexual. Male gay inclusion is 100% there even if you pretend otherwise.

I want you to actually describe the comic you want. The ideal gay male gaze comic. Tell me what it looks like. Tell me what it is about. Tell me the level of writing or art talent you'd want. Don't just give people impossible or nebulous search criteria and call them idiots/schmucks/retards. Until you sit down and think this through it's pointless talking to you.

Hey guys, what about that one furry comic about that buff, beefcake-y dog (bear?) in overalls that's always trying to help everyone out? I forgot the name of it, but I've seen it here lots of times. He's friendly and happy all the time. He has a pretty plump booty and one overall strap is always undone. Does anyone know the webcomic I'm talking about?

But the creators must confirm it, see? Only female gay stuff is really done in a respectable manner - male gay stuff is just subtext... unless it's yaoi, but that's just exploitation crap.

Japan thinks homosexuality doesn't even exist. They view it as a mere fetish over there, hence why it's never been illegal. I'm not a racist for stating facts.

Bueno Excellent probably the closest thing to what you asked for.