Can she save the Emoji Movie?

Can she save the Emoji Movie?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=o_nfdzMhmrA
youtube.com/watch?v=coplvlOBWaQ
vimeo.com/150483774
fictionpress.com/s/3206139
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No, and then Shadman is going to make porn of her and the Emoji Movie will be twice as dead.

How will porn save a movie?

>emoji spewing girl is not a disgusting slut with dyed hair and indecent clothing
HAH.

>Can she become a flavor of the month waifu that incites people to make shitty daily generals filled with sexualized images and cause those same people to spam drawthreads with requests

What if it is a porn movie?

*Make degenerate porn with young kids.
*Don't worry she is 18 because I said so, ignore every details of the body!
*Oh my god guys, stop complaining. What are you? Cuck sjw?

Shadman is normalfag's first loli.

>halfway through the movie they rip off the sausage party sex scene

I will literally never even consider watching that movie.

Pick your poison Sup Forums.

youtube.com/watch?v=o_nfdzMhmrA
youtube.com/watch?v=coplvlOBWaQ

She convinced me to watch it.

that guy singing the theme sounds like sonic boom sonic

And on top of that and his generally shitty artstyle, his lolis arr rook same.
>tooth gap
>that constant demented/nervous look on their faces

He's gonna rape a little girl some time later. His urges are getting stronger with the loli he's making.

He's already drawn a real girl and probably would have made it sexual if he could get away with it.

I just saw the trailer

Interesting how the smiley one voiced my Maya Rudolph is the villain

Can't wait for it

Shad art when?

Is English even your first language?

What does it matter? It's still just a fucking drawing. Who cares? Besides autistic moralfags obviously.

It's like fantasizing sexually about real people is somehow a new concept for you.

I guarantee you someone will make an edit of the movie with only her parts.
vimeo.com/150483774

whenshegetsyourdicpic.jpg

>The scene when she just starts crying in class

Kill yourself nigger. The "its just a drawing" excuse is bullshit. The fact that the drawing has a real person who is underage in it is the questionable aspect.

>I will not put forward an argument
>but I'll drop this hot opinion and attach a strawman meme
Gee, thanks, you retarded faggot.

>I refuse to admit I'm wrong so I'll resort to buzzwords

I said the drawing is of an underage girl who is real, there is obviously no way for you to justify this without sounding like a complete faggot. Have fun jacking off to your shitty loli, your family must be very proud of you.

Did that work for Boss Baby?

I literally can't admit to being wrong. You haven't presented an argument for me to do so. You just said "x is shit — admit you're wrong!", retard is more of an accurate label for you at this point.

Why is that important? You can't find a reason this is bad other than "muh feelings". That's why you resort to logical fallacies instead. In the end it's one consenting adult creating pictures for the enjoyment of another consenting adult.

The single argument you can raise here is that if the person the pic references sees it, it might cause them distress. But a whole lot of 18+ shit on the internet can cause a child distress, should everyone just stop producing adult-only content because children could see it? This is art meant for adult consumption, the artist bears no responsibility if it's presented to or found by an underage individual like so much porn and gore on the internet.

Why the fuck are people arguing about lolicon? It's just weird porn on the Internet. You could always ignore its existence, like 99.9% of other weird porn on the Internet.

Don't you understand that drawing a real underage kid in a sexualized way is wrong? This isn't solely about "feelings" but it actually goes into the bounds of compromising safety for the kid. Child grooming on the internet is a concern, and when some fag draw a kid like that and random guys are actually jacking off to it, it's not completely unfeasible that there will be more vulnerabilities to the kid compared to other kids. What would you think if someone drew your own kid that way? I don't think you would be saying the shit you're saying.

Also, making drawings like that of people build unwanted reputation for them. Lt Corbis knows about the drawing of her. Although she isn't traumatized by it, it's pretty obvious she and her family doesn't want people to think of the drawing when she is seen. Why cant people like her have control over their own reputations? I think nobody wants to be known as the guy or girl who was in a shadman drawing.

It's about real people. I don't care very much about lolicon.

If a person is so mentally unstable that a drawing will set them off, it was only a matter of time before they attacked someone in the first place.

No one with half a brain will think less of a person because a third party made a lewd drawing of them.

And again "muh feelings". What we like or don't and the issue of it being a perfectly legal and moral action is different.

>Can she save the Emoji Movie?
not even god could. let it be

The very fact that a person of a young age is being associated with pornography without their consent is what is wrong. People of that age should be free from that.

Nobody here said it should be illegal, the argument was that it is unethical. Just because this is a moral issue doesn't mean morals are completely irrelevant to the discussion. If I said attacking people arbitrarily is wrong, would it make sense for anyone to say "lol it's just your feelings, it's all subjective bro." ?

>le helicopter homicide meme
So much for the rational right.

I hate that shadman somehow became the ambassador for loli over night. Fuck you people.

She will "be saved" to my "folder" if you know what I "mean"

Wasn't it Bleedman before him?

I wonder what happened to that guy.

lol, the only reason pornography is even considered something bad to be associated with is a completely subjective thing. There is absolutely nothing wrong with pornography or being involved with it.

And what about people who chose to be involved with pornography, haven't they made a decision to involve everyone affiliated with them without consent? And what about the parents of underage celebrities and actors who have put them in the public eye, isn't it ultimately their fault for putting their child at risk trough exposure?

We're talking morality of legal actions, the one field which is completely subjective. The very fact that they are not illegal means their immorality is not objective.

To be truly irrational is to be pacifist

I'd say Simon is the real loli king of Sup Forums

Seriously, the guy is always streaming cartoons and animated movies while drawing any waifus in it
I haven't seen any of his stuff be posted on Sup Forums in a while though

>normalfags.
>shadman.
There are two types of fucked up people.
Cringing ones, these are on shit like sonic, anime and MLP, stuff that it's childish and usually this people act childish.
People laugh at these kind of persons.

And Sick ones, these are into gore shit girls with dicks bdsm or just shit, like literally shit(excrement) shit that really spook you because it's gross.
People stay away from these because of fear of getting killed and/or raped for a satanic ritual.

she looks like every girl I've had a crush on since the second grade and it pisses me off

No. Stop masturbating to cartoon children.

>caring about real people

sToP mAsTuRbAtInG tO CaRtOoN ChiLdReN

Hopefully something horribly obscene, with lots of jizz and her being pregnant. Thatd be hot as fuck.

At least she's cute

Reminder that Sony is going to have to sell off its movie division after this flops.

He's done full on porn of multiple real girls, like that one 11 year old alt-right youtuber.

>Implying being a Pacifist is bad

Oh no, he put a bunch of words next to a drawing of a fat guy.

Game over, guys. He got us.

A girl falls in love with a boy.

Unable to confess, she is gifted by a deus ex machina with the boy's phone number. Never minding the strange area code, she immediately calls him, and is overjoyed to find out that he has a crush on her as well.

But, the next day, when she recounts the previous day's confessions to the boy, he only looks at her with a perplexed expression. After some investigation, she finds out that the boy she called is not the same boy she fell in love with. In fact, he doesn't exist in this universe at all. He is the alternate universe counterpart of her crush, who has fallen in love with her AU self, who too is blissfully unaware of his crush.

Hijinks ensue as they strike up a deal to give each other their darkest, most private secrets in order to equip each other with the weapons they need to conquer the heart of their other selves. While the two chase their respective loved ones, DRAMA ensues as they begin to fall in love with each other instead and question the NATURE of LOVE.

Back to

>The "its just a drawing" excuse is bullshit.

Not really. It's just that the "it's just a drawing" excuse doesn't apply when you draw real life little girls. Like the little girl playing Pokken Tournament that Sup Forums delivered twice on its drawthreads.

Then again, I just oppose drawing real life people in fanart or commissions. That's the kind of shit you can get sued over.

>pregnant

Being pregnant is not hot you fucking degenerate

...

nobody just saves the emoji movie

goddamit i always fall for this

Its the most natural thing you can do to a loli. I dont get your resistance to it.

I don't get it.

>doesn't remember zootopia

Stop posting that because it's already a thing.

fictionpress.com/s/3206139

>Sup Forums memes

Is it true that shad got kicked out of norway fo drawing loli porn and fled to California?

Is she gonna be "The Riley" of the movie?

The boy is obviously "The Riley", Girl is just the romantic interest.

Still just a drawing. What now?

wait, she's not the main character?

I get the impresion that's the boy. You know with the "act cool" and everything i think that it's gonna have the "don't hide your real emotions, be yourself" ending.

Boy seems like the MC, Girl seems like the popular girl-romantic interest.

Bleedman doesn't have a hate-meme surrounding him nor is his work any special like people thought it was in the early 2000's

I know that US Federal Law mentions drawings of minors are not child porn unless photographically similar, and most 1st world countries don't agree.

My point is that young kids shouldn't be associated with pornography. There is a clear distinction between kids and adults.

I meant it was a bullshit excuse in that case.

i thought this movie was cancelled. Sony has to see that this movie will flop hard. any sales they get will be just for the mere spectacle of looking at the abomination. surely counting on those sales wouldn't be enough, is this why they do so much adam sandler shit?

We need some hackers to leak this movie already.

Nope, they cancelled the Popeye movie for this.

hi Sup Forums

Someone should make fake retarded plot leaks that sound plausible and then repost it onto Reddit so "journalists" repost it onto their blogs aka news sites. I'd do it but I'm not smart or creative enough.

how does one save a trash fire?

>. The fact that the drawing has a real person who is underage in it is the questionable aspect.
I knew marvel was behind the gecoide of mutants

Nothing will save the Emoji Movie.

She's obviously going to be BLACKED
and I can't wait

anarcho commies arent pacifist either user

Fuck, seriously? Those concept animations seemed so promising...

>and shadman is gonna make porn of her

Well at least something nice will come of it then

I suggest you go back to /rebbit/. You aren't wanted here.

>coming to a board full of man-children who circle jerk to cartoon little girls around the age of 10 to complain about lolicon
??????????

The making porn of real children thing is pretty fucked up, but half of you don't even seem concered about that.

nah theyd rather defend their shitty fetish than adress the fact that their messiah shadman has drawn porn of real underage people, but because its a drawing its okay to sexualize them bro

by

Didn't one of u fuckers say that Emoji's are big in Asia?

>shadman has drawn porn of real underage people

WHAAATTT?

I like Shadman now because of facebook people like you.

yeah, even his own mom.

It's somehow worse
>Draw loli porn
>Relies on corruption fetish
>Instead of using a pen name, try to make a fame on it, having personal profiles and photos over the internet
>Draws Hillary Clinton as a perverted loli being fucked
>Draws underage Youtube e-celebrities as well
>Pretends the backlash on him is unexpected and blame it to the SJW boogeymen

Shadman is not only a terrible artist, he is also retarded.

There is a reason why all japanese doujinshi artists use fake names

Noose.
What if drawing has a fictional character?

Was the intent of your comment to let everyone know you're a faggot?

That's a little known fact, Shadman is the son of a loli. We all know that saying "sons marry their mothers", so he had no chance at normality. Destined to become a loli artist from day 1.

I can see it now... Probably some scat stuff too with the shit emoji... Yeah. I can see it.