Bright [2017] by David Ayer

What's the Iogical explanation for this discrepancy?

Other urls found in this thread:

dropbox.com/sh/7jibpflwacvflns/AAASw2jV_OVtRpHYppZfDO3ma?dl=0&preview=MR RIGHT - Max Landis.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Critics have different standards for quality, while audiences just want something bright and loud and fun to play on the tv while they're folding laundry.

It's an Elvish conspiracy.

Max Landis is a shit writer carried by nepotism throughout his extraordinarily-mediocre career, and when David Ayer doesn't have an excellent script to work with, he generally stops giving a fuck about the quality of the production. Hence, Bright was a shit film, and critics knew it.

Whats the logical explanation for reposting the same threads every day multiple times a day?

Just saw the movie, it was bad even if you ignore the political "message"

Ayers rewrote a lot of Landis' script. It was a vast improvement over the original.

dropbox.com/sh/7jibpflwacvflns/AAASw2jV_OVtRpHYppZfDO3ma?dl=0&preview=MR RIGHT - Max Landis.pdf

>It's an Elvish conspiracy.

>No, it's an (((Elvish))) conspiracy.

Judges as part of the buddy-cop genre, the movie was perfectly acceptable for 1.5 hours of mindless and fun entertainment. It isn't award winning work, but it's certainly not one of the worst movies of the year as many critics contend.

But then why is Star wars ranked so highly amoungst critics while the general audiences found the movie lacking story, character development, cohesive tone, pay offs from mini-storylines that where started in TFA?

Critics have higher standards and see things that the common, stupid crowd don't see. That's what make them critics,

...

A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.

A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.

>Critics have higher standards

Higher standards for what exactly?

Is there some sort of special critic training and a licensing exam and continuing education of which I', not aware?

Critics are largely tasked with advising people whether they will enjoy a movie, and why or why not. When there's such a huge discrepancy between critics and viewing public, such as with Bright or Last Jedi, is not a question of "standards," but rather why aren't critics competently doing their jobs.

Calling people "stupid" because the enjoy a movie that doesn't comport with the mostly monocultural views of critics demonstrates nothing but base snobbery and explains why people often ignore experts in more important fields.

In addition to the above, let's also not forget that big-budget, big-starpower movies on platforms like Netflix also have the potential to upend a business model that supports the lifestyles and pays the bills of these same critics. In these critics are indeed operating with "higher standards," should we expect some acknowledgment of these conflicts of interest as we would with other purported experts.

This is not to suggest that one has to like Bright or that it was a fantastic film. However, near universal condemnation by critics that it was the worst film of 2017 when the audience seemed to enjoy it in equally large proportion definitely raises legitimate questions.

The only director this year to correctly make a raunchy romp

...

litty movie made for the fans only

until they're blasted with flashy dishonest cgi turds. but I guess it's their job to shill those big blockbusters.

LITTY
I
T
T
Y

>It's their job to shill those big blockbusters.

Hey, sometimes you just gotta pay the bills.

The quiche and organic kale don't pay for themselves.

How does one determine if a film that's already been paid for fully by Netflix is successful?

nah it really is among the worst films of the year

If the fans loved the RAUNCHY BIG BELLY LAUGHS and FUN PISS YOUR PANTS scenes, then it's LITTY as f*ck!

Viewership numbers and increased Netflix subscriptions over the coming weeks.

It's similar to how the industry is evaluating Star Trek Discovery on CBS All Access.

I think Netflix distribution had a lot to do with it. If all these people had to trouble themselves with going to the cinema and paying to see it, they probably wouldn't like the film as much.

The critics wanted a film about race baiting. They wanted something they could relate BLM to.

Instead they were given a legitimately createive fantasy movie about Bad Boys saving the world from Elves.

They're just fucking people. These "high standard" critics gave shit like Revenge of the Sith 80%+ scores.

City people all liked The Last Jedi. Only rural and suburban retards liked Bright.

This. Plebs going to pleb.

...

So supposed 11 million viewers in first 3 days doesn't mean anything?

>ty people all liked The Last Jedi. Only rural and suburban retards liked Bright.

And those same urbanites wonder how Trump managed to get elected...

>"experts"

The various articles seem to imply Netflix is very pleased with the initial response to Bright. Nevertheless, an evaluation of whether the $90+ million cost of the movie was a value proposition for the company will likely not be evident for at least the next couple of months if not longer.

Disco is a good show and it was interesting seeing a Klingon sex scene with nudity.

>Giants make 0.5% of the population
>The chances of snu-snu becomes dimmer
Fuck

great concept, shit execution

Critics absolutely hate flicks, no matter how fun they are.

If you think this movie is in any way worse than The Dark Knight Rises you need to be shot in the face.

so that's why critics love mahvel?