What the FUCK did he mean by this
What the FUCK did he mean by this
It's about time Biiiihhhhhh
>literally unironically "the time of white men is over"
wew
He meant that since the majority of all the major films have an all-white cast or have white people at the center of the attention, then it's about time that we see one blockbuster film in which the majority of the cast is black.
It's not that films had to correspond to a certain ratio of this or that character to be diverse. A diverse movie is only so when next to other films. An all-black cast is diverse precisely because it diverges from the norm that we usually see in cinema, which is predominantly white with token black characters.
>there are still cucks that will give Disney after this
>post yfw there are people on this board who will watch Black Panther
It means casual anti-whiteness is acceptable in our society
>A diverse movie is only so when next to other films
So anyone who isnt black isnt diverse. Got it.
quality bait
...
Yeah this makes absolutely no sense.
>It's time for the white man, to end.
How are you not getting this. Most movies are mostly white. A movie that is mostly black diverges from this norm.
>this is your mind on Sup Forums
Your time is ending white crackers, the black man will reign supreme as he did once before and we will DOMIANTE your white bitches. We will pump your white bitches full of our superior black seed, inseminating the next evolution of humanity into the new BLACK age.
...
Is it DC or Marvel character? I seriously never heard about him
The Jews knew they went overboard with the BLACKED stuff and got the whites all riled up. This is a attempted to BLACK the Asians instead for a bit. Around Jews never relax
does it matter? capeshit is capeshit.
>as he did once before
When?
watching his career fall apart before it even gets of the ground will be amazing and sweet.
About ~6000 years ago
Sure, who cares, not going to watch it on the big screen though, full disclosure am not even white.
Egypt? Carthage? Do you not READ you fucking wh*te subhuman cracker? This is why you dumb racist mother fuckers are getting bred out. The black man is taking back control.
Marvel character, talks like a Nigerian all throughout the movie.
Only for this movie eh.
I divorced my wife because she said she wanted to go see Black Panther with our kids.
Yes. It's about time blacks stick to their own movies so I can avoid them more easily.
His imdb page looks dead past PRU
>Islam is the youngest of the major religions
>Yakub
>6000 years ago, nation of Islam
You know what's real white privilege? To actually have a culture that you don't have to make up.
black.
panther.
who do you think greenlit that character and name?
You moron. She is going to get murdered.
>we wuz kangs
>mexicans are historically emperors
>no mexicans on this movie
not watching, fuck marvel
Blacks are only 12% of the population, how many blockbuster films do you think a tenth of the population should merit?
Asians are 6% of the population, shouldn't they be championed as well? Champion them *even more* on the minority stack?
Of course, there have been many all-black or primarily-black films but you did add the extra notation of "blockbuster" here. That seems to be part of the problem, no progress is ever good enough, coming off of Midnight having won last year's academy award for Best Picture has to be ignored, now it needs to be a "blockbuster" black film so move that goalpost a little further back. After Black Panther makes oodles of money, where will the bar be moved next?
How are we supposed to take your desires seriously when you dismiss all previous progress as "white with token black characters"? In other words, why should we think you won't casually dismiss BP next year?
BTW, do films like The Color Purple and Purple Rain not count as blockbusters? There are a host of other black films but I'd think these two at least gained both enough critical acclaim and box-office earnings to meet your criteria.
>Biiiihhhhhh
What did he mean by THIS?
Good riddance. Fucking race traitor.
It looks like they're both wincing in pain.
only her vagina
He's a literal fag IRL
>Niggers can't get together and make movies where themselves are the protagonists and the cast.
>Cry when le white men don't put them in their movies as protagonists
>Expect all of us to cheer when after all the crying they get to be in the white men's movies
youtube.com
he meant GET IT ON TIL HE DIE
chimpers gonna chimp
>Go from one extreme to another extreme.
What a great idea.
That's not what diversity meeeeeeans
Jesus, fucking up definitions triggers my autism.
twitter.com
If you don't find this heartwaming you're racist
>before
Like, back in the mud huts in africa?
>pump your white bitches full of our 'superior' black seed
You already do that, african american contraception game is shit. Enjoy paying child support for your hundred squalling mulattos
Checked. Holy mother... those skull sizes...
Realistically, as long as there's a market for it, there should be big movies with primarily black casts from time to time. Just as there will always be lots of movies with primarily white casts.
The amount of blockbusters that a tenth of the population should merit is in the ball park of the amount that they will monetarily support. I imagine that making Asian targeted movies starts to get into the area where there just isn't a large enough target audience for good returns. Just as there are basically no Jewish targeted movies...Jews are like 2% of the population, so it wouldn't get supported.
But CLEARLY, black people are making a lot of noise about wanting some movies targeting and representing them, just as white people get plenty of movies and shows with just a token minority or two. This is all basically fine. It's just influencing the market by voting with your wallet, at the end of the day.
So what you're saying "diverse" is a euphemism for less white people.
Postmodernist Marxists BTFO
I actually like boyega a lot in tfa but then I found out he was a ungrateful twerp on Twitter, acting like he’s doig Star Wars a favour by acting in it, daisy Ridley even more so
>there are no Jewish targeted movies
Hmmm
>Equality means the minority get everything their way
If the time of the white man is over lets be honest, it goes Chinese>Indians>Arabs>Disease>>>>(Powergap)>>>Then the blacks
I'm not the world's greatest fan of black people and even I can see that this post makes sense.
Perhaps one in the entire history of cinema is enough.
Stan Lee
Fuck, you put gooks before browns, based as fuck.
t. mexican
He's an annoying cunt.
You got Leonard Part 6. Why do you think we stopped that shit in it's tracks?
Now STFU. STFD. Be humble.
Lol, they are too busy fucking white women.
That's exactly what it means.
I'm more white than you are
>t. 56%
The fact that you aren't memeing and you literally can't understand an argument/explanation that simple makes me feel bad for you
>Realistically, as long as there's a market for it, there should be big movies with primarily black casts from time to time. Just as there will always be lots of movies with primarily white casts.
>Just as there will always be lots of movies with primarily white casts.
Yet everyone flips their shit when the latter happens, every time. You won't see any diversity hires in 100% black movies, but they are mandatory in movies which have a white cast. And you wonder why people hate SJWs.
I feel like you're really close to reaching a breakthrough realization here and just haven't quite made the final step yet.
You're absolutely right, movie-making is all about the money, and the money comes from the available market to support the product. You seem to realize and acknowledge that a product targeted primarily at 6% of the country's population isn't feasible but seem to wander away down a blind alley when pondering if market forces would commensurately apply to 12% of the market. Meanwhile, whites who have been 75%+ of the country's population for a long time, who have only recently dropped to "only" 65% of the population, are still two-thirds of the market and are going to be the logical primary targets of mass-market products.
Obviously there is such a thing as niche markets, you'll make a lot of money selling, say, hair products for african-american hair needs. But it is by definition a niche market. Your "blockbuster film" requirement is almost a contradiction, you want a niche focus but you want it to result in mass-market earnings.
Social media makes a lot of noise about anything and everything. Its only been a few weeks since social media was declaring re: ST:Discovery how it was about time there was a black/female lead in a Star Trek series. Racial progress that happened more than a year ago might as well not have occurred at all to these kids.
No, what he means is that diversity is by definition the breaking of the norm. If we take into account that most movies have white lead or white cast, then a movie with a black cast or lead is diverse. Something different if you will. Same goes if you revert the situation. If you see a movie out of Bollywood with a predominantly white cast then by definition that movie is diverse
So in the context of western films, breaking the norm = less white people. Nice job repeating what that user just said
*fewer
Yes but from his reply he seemed to imply that every time a movie was not white lead it was diverse which is not the case and I thought it needed clarification, if not for him, to anyone reading :D
He meant he doesn't really care about diversity he just wants to see blacks on screen, even without whites.
Atlas shrugged.
>implying most of the "white" people you see in tv and film are actual whites
he's racist faggot and """someone""" should take care of him
...
this man is right, the rest of you are wrong
great job
Niggers are going to get awfully rowdy around the movie's release but I think it will be worth it because of all the cell phone videos that will release of them whooping and dancing in the theaters.
Imagine the scene when the movie makes a relatable joke about cocoa butter or some shit and the whole theaters erupts into OOOOOO DAS ME!!!! DAS RITE!!!"
>It's not that films had to correspond to a certain ratio of this or that character to be diverse. A diverse movie is only so when next to other films. An all-black cast is diverse precisely because it diverges from the norm that we usually see in cinema, which is predominantly white with token black characters.
Your father is ashamed of you for wasting his money learning how to do liberal arts mental gymnastics like this. An all-black cast is not "diverse" no matter which way you slice it.
Plus, you are completely missing the point. It is not a real issue in the first place that majority white countries may cast primarily white actors and actresses. Nor is it an issue when Tyler Perry or Eddie Murphy make a blockbuster with an all-black cast. It does not matter. It only becomes an issue when liberals with white guilt such as yourself start with the tokenism and identity politicking.
In fact, the reason why this Black Panther thing sucks is precisely that it is panders to this crude notion of "diversity" you seem to embrace. The studio execs knew exactly what they were doing appealing to the leftist echo chamber, hence the flood of articles and tweets. And they know that the leftist echo chamber will fight tooth and nail to defend the movie even if it sucks, that it will get a high RT score, and all of that stupid shit you people pride yourselves on. And of course Boyega (the guy whose whole shtick is that he's king token) would go and say some stupid shit like "it's about time". He didn't mean "well it's diverse relative to the blah blah blah", he meant, "it's great to see this big studio appealing to our identity politicking".
...
Should've killed her. Now she will make them watch it and teach them to take the bbc
WE
Doesn't care about the fact that hispanics have less roles but make up more of the population. Every movie should be at least 50% black cuz muh diversity
Thanks
I'm looking forward to shitstorm incoming
When it succeeds they gonna go ape and spam
>WE WUUUZ and shit
but when it fails, they gonna rage and call everyone racist.
Either way You are getting ZOO-like experience incoming.
What's wrong with atheism, video games and gay rights?
Desu TBQH. Fedora warriors fight against the Halal terrors.
>Being this willfully ignorant of a simple concept for the sake of wanting to be so right
When does diversity make you uncomfortable, user?
Only Finn is wincing cause he doesnt actually like her, Rose is just some fat chink who had a crush on him and wanted the BBC of a resistance hero. Finn clearly still wants Rey's sweet white pussy but she's already been satisfied by Kylo's BWC after they had telepathic force sex, which was edited out by the Disney jews.
Name ONE movie with an all-white cast, noting of course that Jews are not white.
Not an argument. By the way, you're the one making a simple concept complex. I explained that in my post, which you should re-read.
Kylo isn't white
>Stan Lee[1] (born Stanley Martin Lieber /ˈliːbər/, December 28, 1922)
>Stanley Martin Lieber was born on December 28, 1922 in New York City,[7] in the apartment of his Romanian-born Jewish immigrant parents, Celia (née Solomon) and Jack Lieber, at the corner of West 98th Street and West End Avenue in Manhattan.[8][9]
Hmm... Hmm.
>diversity is by definition the breaking of the norm
That is not the definition of diversity.
>We preach tolerance while we were the minority....
Neither is your "nuh uh because the left!" argument. The cast is diverse relative to Hollywood's casting trends. It isn't hard to grasp, why are you struggling?
What rights do gays not have? Why are all of these fucking organizations obsessed with “rights”? What group in 2017 in the US (the most prosperous nation in human history) is actually oppressed compared to the rest of the world?
You act like gays could always marry who they wanted to marry lol.
2018 now fgt
WUZ