The official numbers are in, not estimates. Star Wars made less than predicted over the 4-day weekend, Jumanji made slightly more than predicted.
The age of #LittyKino is upon us.
The official numbers are in, not estimates. Star Wars made less than predicted over the 4-day weekend, Jumanji made slightly more than predicted.
The age of #LittyKino is upon us.
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com.do
twitter.com
Great news! So when is Jumanji going to pass 1 Billion Dollars USD?
How many of these littyposters have actually seen the new Jumanji?
...
hello shill
When is TLJ going to make it's initial prediction of 1.9 billion?
I asked you a question.
When is Jumanji going to pass 1 Billion Dollars USD?
Shortly before you kill yourself.
hey marketer why does that matter?
So you're saying that Jumanji is never going to make 1 Billion Dollars USD? That's sad.
What went wrong?
Jumanji wasn't predicted to do amazing, it already has like 300 million and is doing better than expected. The Last Jedi is underperforming, get over it.
t. Sony shill.
Damage control.
>jumanji no gross 1.9 billion liek stah wahrs
It's sad that Jumanji isn't litty enough to break a billion dollars.
A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.
Someone just answer my question please. When is Jumanji going to gross one billion dollars? Isn't it doing well?
Star Wars was foretasted to break 1.9 billion.
Now that estimate is down to 1.6
No one predicted it. They predicted
1.4 - 1.7 billion.
>Star Wars was foretasted
By whom?
Maybe they will reconsider episode 3 but I doubt it.
You think the Rock feel humiliated after getting beat by a movie starring a teenage girl? That's gotta hurt.
>somewhat conservative estimate of $1.9 billion in box office haul
WHOOPS
1.9 billion was never in the cards. That'd be way too good a follow up to a Stars Wars film that benefited from no Star Wars films for like 15 years.
>somewhat conservative estimate of $1.9 billion in box office haul
I saw that line.
Now tell us who said it. Because it certainly wasn't Disney.
A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.
Literally one source by a literal who.
>i too dumb to lead tings
>no it no cunt it no real
>hat'd be way too good a follow up to a Stars Wars film that benefited from no Star Wars films for like 15 years.
And yet, it made almost as much opening weekend. What a pity that it didn't have the same legs or it would've been 100 percent in the cards, if not better. Even if it had the hold of, oh just putting it out there, Attack of the Clones, percentage wise, it would've still easily made much much more.
I wonder why they chose Jumanji now that the holidays are over... hmmm...
It really doesn't though. People from Forbes to The Hollywood Reporter to Bloomberg predicted 1.4 - 1.7 billion. Just because some dude predicts 1.9 billions, in contradiction with the majority of people, doesn't make it right.
It made fully 30 millions less than TFS. Not a small chunk with numbers of 215 and 245 million ish. Like a week in it was running 26% behind TLJ. Literally nothing wrong with it.
TFA*
>no de predit no high
>see mai no source er day
Source that links to THR and Forbes in the screenshot.
>2017/12/26
So? They reference predictions from when it opened.
Oh I read it. Now let's hear you tell us who actually said it would make 1.9 Billion
Because it wasn't Disney.
Not an argument.
>They reference predictions from when it opened.
>see i jus say shit n it rael
>star wars fags
What about the non quantifiables like brand damage, derision, outright contempt for being bait and switched and sold wholesale feminist marxist propaganda?
How much was that worth?