Who the fuck is this guy?

Who the fuck is this guy?

Other urls found in this thread:

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Wizard_in_the_Leaky_Cauldron
youtube.com/watch?v=WpICP_naoX8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

cedir c dircgory

I JUST WANNA BE A DOOOOOOOOOOOOOR

HE'S READING A BOOK ABOUT TIME IN A MOVIE ABOUT TIME TRAVEL LMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAO

He's a random guy doing wandless magic in a world where the most powerful wizards in all of history could not do wandless magic.

And hes just there for like 2 seconds and never seen again

You are wrong.

average simian looking northerner

tbqhwya, their self-titled album is the best British album of all time.

Is that Oasis man?

King Monkey

Ian Brown

The strongest wizard in Bongistan. Too redpilled to waste time on academia, fighting noseless 56%ers, or the ministry

all wizards can do wandless magic you retard, remember when harry let the window of the snake enclosure disappear?

it's powerful wandless magic that's hard to do, stirring a spoon is easy

LOOK MATE IM READIN A FOOKIN BOOK INNIT, IM SMART AS FUCK ME MATE

>stirring a spoon is easy

oy lets c u do it then bruv

A wizard reading a book by a scientist.

Making glass vanish from reality isn't difficult? Badass.

someone who sings like a drunk shouting into a bucket

A truly enlightened wizard.

Anyone can do wandless shit, it's just more difficult. Same for doing shit without speaking out the name of the attack like it's naruto.

I remember seeing this in the pictures and thinking the same thing because his face was so familiar. Then I realised it was noel brown of the Arctic roses.

>the most powerful wizards in all of history could not do wandless magic

>Harry sends his aunt flying when he's angry
>Snape and Voldy fucking FLY

>no dullest franchise guy yet

I didn’t even notice.

Just because I'm late to the thread doesn't stop Harry Potter from being one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

@92683805
@92683944
>samefagging this hard

I'm confiscating your (You)'s, if you behave you can collect them at the end of the thread.

Harry didn't do focused wandless magic I suppose. But then again you could bring out the argument that kids are super powerful caues innocence or some shit

Which harry potter was this in?

Seriously kill yourself.

IWAAAAAAAANNAIWANNNNNNNNNAIGOTTABEADORED

>reading science, pop-sci but science nonetheless
So why don't they teach maths, chemistry, and physics at Hogwarts? Why don't they teach how to manipulate individual atoms, etc?

2

Oh fuck I never knew Ian Brown was in HP

Nah the kids just don't know better. Anyone with magic in them can end up doing weird shit if they go out of control, the point is teaching them to properly control it through the medium of a wand and spells so the shit comes out doing what the wizard intends. That's the way it commonly works in fantasy and harry potter is no different.

That's advanced ministry of mysteries shit.

Stifler was in Harry Potter?

>not recognising Bez from the Inspiral Charlatans

I used to think he was singing "I wanna be a dog."
Love the guitar on that track.

not until my powers manifest in the 30th birth year

>advanced
>middle-school muggle knowledge
The world in Harry Potter is so poorly developed, simply contrived.

Et's ard oop norf ferra chaykay moonkah!

>wandless magic in a world where the most powerful wizards in all of history could not do wandless magic.

That isn't Shaun Ryder.

PoA while Harry's staying at the Leaky Cauldron

>The world in Harry Potter is so poorly developed, simply contrived
That's true, but it's not because of your reasons you fucking autust.

Isn't it canon that wizards are dumb as shit about non-magical subjects?

The ring is the wand, nobody said they had to be stick shaped

t. tumblrfag

You see several examples of people doing wandless magic in the films themselves though. The wand isn't necessary for magic to be done, but it does concentrate it and make it easier.

Why would you need math and physics when you know the world is governed by magic bullshit and you can use said magic bullshit to do anything? Only ministry autists would be using magic on photons and shit to see what happens. And yes the world of harry potter is mediocre but that's alright, it's a simple story for teenagers.

harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Wizard_in_the_Leaky_Cauldron
>This wizard was portrayed by Ian Brown in the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban in a celebrity cameo.
>He's reading of a book titled A Brief History of Time is probably foreshadowing for the use of time travel later in the film.
>Notably enough, the copy of said book owned by the Wizard was not yet published in 1993. It has been suggested that he might actually be a time traveller himself, which would explain his interest in that muggle book.

Basically, yes.

Seann William Scott

Yeah. Supposedly after the witch trials and all that wizards didn't want to bother with that shit anymore and decided to hide themselves. They stopped having contact with non magical shit and having no use for it, just forgot about most of it.

fucking hell i bet these fucking pricks are male too

They are also however so in touch with muggle trends even the Malfoys will stock up on things like fleets of Rolls Royces. This worldbuilding is shit.

What? Where did you see malfoy rolls royce

It's on Rowling's stupid Pottermore site. Considering the nonsense she puts up there it's very believable that the books were heavily ghostwritten

Go to bed, Ebaneezer Yidkowski

Really? Well that's just fucking stupid. It makes sense that old pureblood families would be ostentatious as fuck but with muggle cars? That's just silly.
They used to have peacocks ffs

Chances are that she just had a very good editor who wasn't afraid to shoot down the more retarded ideas.
When that editor went, this is the shit that happens. Pun intended.

>>Notably enough, the copy of said book owned by the Wizard was not yet published in 1993. It has been suggested that he might actually be a time traveller himself, which would explain his interest in that muggle book.
Does the fact that the Death Eaters destroy a bridge that didn't exist when the film occurrs also suggest time travel?

Also Elizabeth the First never married because she turned down a Malfoy's offer of marriage and he cursed her in a fit of beta rage.

Mind you, according to Rowling such a couple would result in the Malfoy line losing the use of magic since its recessive.

Stop user
Thank you for wanting to share butI don't want to know any more

As far as I'm concerned, only the books are canon and all the nonsense changes she came up with later are fanfiction, and quite poor ones at that.

based malfoy

>magic is recessive.
So voldemort was right all along

Wow I sure do love dumb Tumblr screencaps.

I ESPECIALLY LOVE THE WAY THEY WRITE HOLY SHIT

HOORAY FOR TUMBLR SCREENCAPS

based

im pretty sure hes an obscure reference only the director knows

A bald assertion isn't an argument. I've already refuted your representation based arguments. Give me something else.

why is this HP world so comfy lads ?

Very nice

who /pulp/ here?

I'm too uncommon desu
They where just live on sky arts aswell speaking of them

decent track as his solo stuff goes

youtube.com/watch?v=WpICP_naoX8

He's a massive attention whore

What he's doing takes the exact same effort as manually stirring the spoon with the additional strain (I assume) of using magic.

It's completely pointless.

Wtf is he even putting in his tea that requires more than three or four stirs to blend in? It's not like he's making a sauce or something.

He's the magical equivalent of some hipster Faggot at Starbucks writing a novel on a MacBook.

Srsly, fuck that guy.

I think he's supposed to be fascinated with the book and lost in thought
Nice reddit spacing

>Nice reddit spacing
Thank you. I'm very proud of it.

Mage hand is a lvl 0 spell ya dingus