How did they get away with blood on Rugrats?

How did they get away with blood on Rugrats?

Cause it was supposed to teach kids that blood is part of you so don't freak out and that a cut will eventually heal on it's own.

Nobody in 1992 had a mangina

FUCKING MILLENNIALSTOP

different time etc. etc.

I think context is important. Getting a cut on your finger is something every kid deals with, its no big deal. Showing blood in a fight shows how much damage is being done.

Context matters.

Even today, Nick still does blood. See The Loud House or Spongebob. It's CN who are fucking pussies

I remember when they got away with blood on Doug and found it surreal.

How'd they get away with teaching kids how to deal with loss?

Why is blood such a touchy thing in kids shows? Same with the word "kill."

"I will destroy you!" So fucking awkward.

Wait, what?

Wow. Didn't know Rugrats was so grimdark.

CRAWLING IN MY CRIB

>Or maybe he's dead
>That'll surprise Chuckie alright

He had a paper cut. I was like "woah," blood on Doug.

This always bugged me.
Why is showing people getting electrocuted okay, but blood is a big no no?
Kids see blood all the damn time, why is it such a taboo?

This episode use to creep me out when stuffing started exploding out of Tommy's finger and leg.

That was much worse than the blood.

THESE OWIES WILL NEVER HEAL

Because people have blood. Usually it comes out when you have mishaps, like as a kid.

After seeing that "disturbed me as a kid," thread I'm starting to be convinced that many of my similarly-aged compatriots are a bunch of coddled, padded-room products of their environment.

Because this show was jewish propaganda

Agreed.

It's not much to get away with. It's just a kid bleeding.

Who knows. Kids know what fucking blood is and I'm sure they've heard the word kill before and know what it means. Who are these idiots trying to protect?

Moral guardians going overboard.

Remember there was a time in animation where "no conflict" was a rule.

Nice.