*steals sargon’s audience*

*steals sargon’s audience*

Other urls found in this thread:

strangenotions.com/does-conscience-point-towards-the-existence-of-god/
unz.com/pfrost/does-natural-law-exist/
psychologytoday.com/blog/reclaiming-childhood/201106/only-humans-have-morality-not-animals
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Sargon being a overly emotional reactionary is nothing new

*clunks spork*

Is that RageAfterStorm?

what's his gimmick?

>e-celeb drama
unironically kill yourselves

edgy libertarian

...

>Alright, everyone
>*clinks glass*
>That's about all.
>...Peace out.

I fucking hate this stupid fag. He needs to get range banned from Sup Forums so we don't have to deal with his self-advertising.

Forecasting the election results almost perfectly three months out through analysis of polling data and pointing out the flaws the MSM was engaging in to skew their results.

He can debate the alt-right without becoming a total sperg while doing it, which is apparently beyond Sargon.

sargon is a messy fake bitch!

Ok what is his deal. Is he Wiccan or something

is he a "sjw"?

left leaning libertarian

i.e socially left but economically right

An important point in that regard is that he is not in favor of open borders.

This faggot is unironically such a brainlet.

>*steals Jiro's audience*

why?

...

>*gives you 100 year old cigarette*

That'll be... free bro! Just let me get a drag!

what are the vids with him dressed up?

Bottom left isnt him and top left is from an earlier vid of his

Nice!

>neopaganism

good

I can sort of understand the impulse to find a religion to replace Christianity with, even if I don't understand what makes Paganism the go to choice of so many teenage edgelords.

When you actually boil down what Christianity is promoting, it's the religion of weaklings, masochists, and SJWs. It's pretty much a death cult, since Jesus' only teaching for how to behave on Earth are 'give up everything you own to whoever wants to take it, if you look at a woman and want to fuck her it's practically rape, don't fight for a better life and just lay down and die so you can go to heaven and be happy'.

Who the fuck is this?

The lamestream legacy media's worst nightmare

but when you boil it down even more, you see that the jesus death cult stuff is a thin layer painted across ideas of morality, community, virtue, and spirituality that predate christianity by thousands of years
you can convert or whatever, but ultimately whatever you're converting from probably isn't too different from whatever you're converting to.

What are Razor's biggest faults?

fucking look at him dude
it's all faults

...

I want to drive my knee in this faggots face so bad

b-but why desu

>ideas of morality
Actually, I'd say Christianity completely wipes out conventional morality. Judaism has morality. In Judaism, as much as everyone loves to laugh at Leviticus, it lays out clear moral laws that its adherents are expected not to violate, and the line between violating them and not violating them is very clear. In Christianity, you're guilty from the moment you're born. Everyone deserves to burn in hell just for existing. Christianity is the abolition of morality into a grey mess of hippy bullshit.

When I look at Christianity, a religion that rose to prominence in the decay of the Roman empire, I see the exact same messy, masochistic thinking that infects the west today. I think it's a diseased, self-hating thing that seems to come about when people's live are too easy and all tradition and virtue has been rendered meaningless.

>Spoony's angry clone
No ty.

razorfist will always be the top tier leather jacket metal listening white dude tho.

Nigga needs to stop making yt videos and put his talents to use, make that $$$.

His "Politics" videos are some of the most pathetic blanket the_donald tier views I've seen. He should have stuck with video games and music.

>vegan
>ex satanist
>pagan
>cross dresser
>bisexual
>larper
nah all ecelebs are garbage

Gay wizard.

based anorexic edgelord

>Reads Evola once

Look nigger, Christianity ttteaches discipline and self sacrifice, and kept the west strong for centuries. It's no coincidence that the decay of the West began with the subversion of Christianity at the Reformation.

Original sin doesn't defeat the existence of other laws in Christianity, though. Something like the 10 Commandments explicitly lays out what you can and can't do.
In addition to that, Christianity had a culture which was steeped in right and wrong doings.

Shit man, the entire point of Kantian ethics is separating the Christianity from the Christian morality, because the latter was so valuable it had to continue even in an atheistic world.
If you're a Westerner, your morals and value system are derived from Christianity. It's just that we were self aware enough to separate out the religious aspect of it.

>unironicallly liking Sargon when he is wrong on everything
>le forced posh English accent must be smart man

>It's just that we were self aware enough to separate out the religious aspect of it.

Not self-aware, selfish. Morality without a base in religion is pointless and self-defeating. That's why the West has declined.

Some fucking degenerate tranny homo who is liked by the_donald.

...

>Morality without a base in religion is pointless and self-defeating.
Why?

All morality and ethics are essentially religious anyway. They're things we just choose to believe in.

Because God is the only real basis that morality can have. Without religion to support morality, people will end up twisting reason to rationalize their base instincts.

No, Truth is knowable.

>No, Truth is knowable.
Scientific facts are knowable.

Law, justice, politics, corporations, trade, etc. are a result of Homo Sapiens being able to produce a fictive language. Lying to ourselves and believing in myths is how society is made.

>Scientific facts are knowable.

Empiricism cannot be proved empirically.

All knowledge is derived from the senses. Can you provide a reason we should think otherwise?

I've never even heard of Evola, m8. Anyway, I'd say that there is some value in Christianity. The fact that it basically strips all mean down to the same equally sinful base may have done more than any philosophical argument to lead to the abolition of slavery and the rise of republics in place of monarchies. That doesn't erase the criticisms of it, though.

>Original sin doesn't defeat the existence of other laws in Christianity, though.
It does, though. The importance of original sin outweighs everything. The worst thing you can lose for violating the 10 Commandments is your life. The worst thing you can lose for not acknowledging your original sin is your soul to the devils of hell, where it will burn in agony forever.

>If you're a Westerner, your morals and value system are derived from Christianity. It's just that we were self aware enough to separate out the religious aspect of it.
To a point, sure. But it's never pure enough, because Christianity lays out a moral system where it's impossible to be human and not commit some sin against God, even if it's in a glance or a thought. Maybe it's the basis of the enlightenment, but then it's also the basis of letting in swathes of refugees to your nation. Hell, if you wanted to be as Christian as possible, you'd welcome the whole world and let them raze your fields and rape all of your women and never raise a hand against them.

Law and Justice are derrived from "Logos" the perceptable Truth that all men know inately.

*Rapes and burns Hasbro to the ground*

>Christianity lays out a moral system where it's impossible to be human and not commit some sin against God, even if it's in a glance or a thought.

Stray thoughts are not a sin, nor is is it impossible to achieve virtue. You're just lazy and find Christianity too difficult because it demands more of you. It's easy to be a pagan and wallow in the mud, much harder to be a monk and build a cathedral.

>But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Jesus totally wasn't talking about thoughtsin there.

You can also go to Hell for violating the 10 Commandments. It's more than just losing your life.

>Maybe it's the basis of the enlightenment, but then it's also the basis of letting in swathes of refugees to your nation
That's more of a denominational issue. Catholics and Orthodox Christians aren't anywhere near as bad as Protestants in terms of refugees.

>All knowledge is derived from the senses.

The senses help us refine our knowledeg, but there is also an innate knowledge within us in the form of a conscience.

strangenotions.com/does-conscience-point-towards-the-existence-of-god/

>Self-control is too hard!

There's no proof of that.

Earlier Sapiens communities have massive differences in their moral systems. Some engaged in warfare, others were peaceful and took care of their elderly. If all men have an innate sense of law and justice, then they shouldn't evolve into so many different varieties.

>it's also the basis of letting in swathes of refugees to your nation

Not if you read Thomas Aquinas.

The most religious nations in the EU (Poland and Hungary) are the ones most resistant to refugees.

You're going to tell me this when you worship a man who told you to gouge your eye out if it made you fantasize about women? To give up your cloak to anyone who wanted to steal it? To offer up unbruised parts of your body to anyone who has hit you?

A man says 2+2 is 5. Another says it is six. Both are wrong. Does that mean there is no correct answer?

unz.com/pfrost/does-natural-law-exist/

>Thomas Aquinas
This kills the atheist.

>You're going to tell me this when you worship a man who told you to gouge your eye out if it made you fantasize about women?

You're going to tell me you don't know what idioms and rhetoric are?

Conscience is just a biological function to help the formation of communities. It's not an inherent form of knowledge and it's not unique to humans.

This isn't addressing the point.
If law and order exist as an innate truth understood by all human beings, then explain why there are such disparities in cultural interpretations of morality.

This is fundmentally the issue though. There have been plenty of great thinkers who have been Christians and worked out methods for melding a text that advocates for being a person who throws away any concern for his wealth, his life, and even his family for Christ, with being prosperous in the here and now. But how many believers have read Thomas Aquinas? How many will read him in perpetuity? And how many will read the commands of Christ in perpetuity?

You need outside influences to keep the most self-destructive ideas of Christianity at bay. You won't win that fight forever. I'd say there's a good amount of evidence you may have lost that fight in the modern world already.

And yet, only humans make moral judgements.

psychologytoday.com/blog/reclaiming-childhood/201106/only-humans-have-morality-not-animals

Joseph Demaistre already answered this. Man removed from Divine Revelation sees his society and values degenerate.

>Because God is the only real basis that morality can have.
Why?

Then explain how this suicidal altuism never arose when Christianity was at the peak of power in Europe, and now only manifests itself when the West has been secularized and dechristianized?

Aquinas argued based on scripture, not inspite of it.

Christ also told you to buy a sword.

Because he is the Absolute being.

Humans are a product of evolution. If we make more advanced moral judgements, then it's a result of bigger brains and our fictive language.
It doesn't point toward the existence of God, it points toward us being a social animal.

Also, I would ask what the article means by 'humans'. Do you mean Homo sapiens? Well, that's certainly wrong. We have proof of Neanderthals (if you consider them a separate species) with their own morality too.

It's as much about the ideas and ideologies of these people than it is about their personalities. More in fact. If Sargon and Styx weren't proxies for political points of view shared by many tens of thousands of people no one would care who these people are.


>even if I don't understand what makes Paganism the go to choice of so many teenage edgelords.
Modern Christianity is completely denuded of its core morality. Young people who go to any modern Christian Church notice immediately that's it's an empty shell. Young pagans feel that the great cuckening of the Christian churches was a historical inevitability based on its doctrines, and any strength Christians had came from European interpretations of scripture. In Paganism they're looking for a more robust faith in the traditions of their people.

Or what this guy said

Kill all shitskins.
That is the only thing Europeans need to know and do now.

Modern Paganism is all reconstructionsit LARPing, not to mention you're more likely to find a bunch of leftist dykes and faggots at a Pagan gathering than you will "MUH BLOOD N HONOUR" types.

They aren't looking for authenticity, they just want a club.

>Young people who go to any modern Christian Church notice immediately that's it's an empty shell.
I think it's important to make a distinction between Christianity (particularly Protestantism) and Catholicism.
The former is dying, fast, (there are now more Catholics than Anglicans in England) as a result of constantly changing their moral code and system of virtues. Protestants accept gays, allow Islam to run rampant, and don't feel the potential of going to Hell as strongly as others do.

Hopefully Catholics don't cuck themselves.

Wisegy atheists take out of context verses literally, while sneering at Christians whom they imagine to be doing the same thing.

You will not find someone more ignorant of religion than a strident atheist.

Also notice how atheists only really talk smack about Christianity. They never level their arguments at Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, or Hindus.

...

Nah he's a fleshnigger not a vegan. He's made videos stating he's not vegan.

>They never level their arguments at Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, or Hindus.
Richard Dawkins fell out of public favor for doing exactly that.

In so many words, he practically ceded that Christianity is the least shit of all the organized religions, especially when compared to Islam.

He basically admitted he's making up his pagan beliefs as he goes along, like most pagans.

I agree, but I'm just answering user's question as to why people are finding it attractive.

There are nationalist pagans, and they don't communicate with the lefty variety. They also tend to be better educated. Ask any leftist pagan to quote their favorite Edda. You'll get a blank stare.

Dawkins/Hitchens atheisim was just a veiled attack on white people.

No shocker that Hitchens was a neoconservative shill who turned out to be a Jew.

>a veiled attack on white people.
Isn't Dawkins notoriously against all that new wave feminist garbage?
He seems like a no nonsense kind of pragmatist. It's hard to see him as self loathing.

>Also notice how atheists only really talk smack about Christianity. They never level their arguments at Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, or Hindus.
I'm the atheist who that user was responding to. I'm levelling my primary criticism at Christianity because, well, traditionally Christian nations are largely the ones that have seen fit to abolish their own cultures in the name of virtue. Islam, for example, does not promote meekness as a virtue, as archaic and barbaric as it is, it reveres strength and the use of it. Islamic nations would never feel obliged to let in a flood of Christians.

I'm also not levelling my criticisms at The Old Testament, which is the favorite dummy target of every teenage atheist. My problems with Christianity are not whether God is real, but whether Christianity has the proper moral base upon which to build a successful, self-interested civilization. I don't think it does, at least not in the long term, and I think the fruits of its own shortcomings are now glaring.

All non white non christians will be hung once the day of the rope starts.

I doubt he actually realized it. When that came to a head he certainly bowed out. But what was he doing other than shitting on the mythology and morality of his own people. Ultimately his opinions were sanctioned and he was given every encouragement by the anti-white establishment. Every media and academic organ touted his bravery for kicking a dying man.

>I'm levelling my primary criticism at Christianity because, well, traditionally Christian nations are largely the ones that have seen fit to abolish their own cultures in the name of virtue.

That is a legitimate criticism of Christianity and perfectly understandable reason to reject modern incarnations of the faith. I was only talking about the neo-atheism that got popular during the Bush era, when everyone was gaslit into thinking the wars were a low-key crusade.

This dude looks so much like my best friend i lost contact with it's uncanny

master of the public space

What's he wrong about?

Yes, god forbid anyone should question the eternal jew's legitimacy.
Good goy.

How do we get free will otherwise?
And if we don't have free will then why have any kind of punitive criminal system.

Without God how do we stop ourselves from treating humans like any other animal and having them just as replaceable?

>How do we get free will otherwise?
Evolution